I agree that rebuilds of this magnitude take a long time.
Which is exactly why trying to accelerate the rebuild was so incredibly stupid. We wasted a ton of assets and now our timeline is out of whack.
There's no agenda - a lot of people here were big Murray fans. But we are literally witnessing the consequences of his bad moves.
Not to mention the fact that Nylander is not looking good at all when we all thought we were getting Sergachev, who's tearing it up.
Let's say June 26th Murray came away from the Draft with just Eichel, the Myers/Stafford/Bogo/Kane, the ROR and Lehner deals never happened(though there would be a Stafford move since he was a UFA to be). Bylsma is our head coach. Who is in our lineup for Buffalo that could take the pressure off of Eichel as being the go to center? If we're stripping Buffalo of the accelerated rebuild pieces, we still have the 1st round picks we received, who is ready to be in the league 2 years after being drafted in 2015? What players do we have that are allowing these young guys to come in and become secondary scoring pieces?
As for the rebuild portion of this team; there were always 4 key points in rebuilding this franchise:
1. Get High quality players through the draft to become your core pieces. Done with drafting Grigorenko, Girgensons, Risto, Zadorov, Reinhart and Eichel.
2. Rebuild this roster so that we can become competitive and these young guys can ride the coat tails of the vets so they can learn to win. To do so, you need high character and/or quality vets on this team to teach them to be professionals(See: Legwand, ROR, Bogo, Gionta, Gorges, Moulson, Kane). IMO, I didn't see any sort of plan from Darcy to do this part or any evidence he was thinking about this part. Tim had this in mind and made moves to make this so. Botts followed this rule as well with the roster moves of getting Scandella, Pominville, Pouilet. You could do this by being patient and hoping guys become available via free agency and overpay (and screw yourself in the future with horrible contracts) for them to entice them to come here, or over pay in assets(like draft picks or prospects). IMO, I think Tim, focused a lot of his energy and time on this part before he was going to focus on the next key point.
3. Rebuild the Prospect pool. This team had nothing in the pipeline after years of being stripped of resources(Thanks Golisano) for drafting purposes. This prospect pool needed to be rebuilt itself. Tim tried to do that with his picks that he had. Botts seems to follow the same idea. Tim focused on more LONGER term projects in his drafting style(longer to develop, leads to rounded out professionals who can then learn the professional habits in the AHL, and then could then be brought up, Botts, remains to be seen how his drafting style is but seeing as he wants guys to learn in the AHL seems to have a similar idea. The difference between the two guys seem to be the level of focus they have on Rochester. Tim seemed to want to focus on having guys develop their skills AWAY from Rochester so HIS guys were not ready yet to be in the AHL. He didn't make it seem like Rochester was a priority yet(I believe we all can fault him on that judgement). Botts cares about Rochester and shows it.
4. Have ALL facets of the Organization follow a set of standards from the very bottom to the big club. This entails that there was a chain of communication from Buffalo to Rochester and lower levels. Players would be taught the same system so it would be as seamless as possible. The quicker the players catch on, the more likely they would play faster and would be more confident in each other, as it would become 2nd nature to them. Standards would be set, and the expectations throughout the franchise would be well known by future players. What's important in this aspect is the coaching hires, and their ability to communicate, teach, and hold the players accountable on and off the ice. This part is very important to have, and one would think THIS would mean that a veteran coach would need to be hired to help the young players gain knowledge and experience in the league. Then if Buffalo needed to change their coach, they would have mature and well-taught players that would have standards from the higher ups of what is expected professionally from them. The only thing that would change is the system of the game itself, but the basic understanding and skills would be there to be used in that new system. The effort, because of the accountability would be there as well.
I believe these are very important, and key points to any team rebuilding. What ruins these rebuilds is impatience, poor coaching, poor quality of players, and ownership not setting standards for a team. I think we have a decent collection of talent. Not world beaters or superstars, but guys who can, when working together, create a competitive team. We have seen it in the past, when these guys work together, they are a decent team. Vegas is doing pretty good for a group of guys who are just good enough to play in the league. With that said, there are a few players Buffalo has acquired that have not worked out, but that comes with every team in the league and at the end of the day is the easiest part of fixing a "broken rebuild". However, I believe Buffalo has failed in the patience department(firing 2 GMs and 3 coaches in just under 5 years), the coaching department(Rolston - Horrible, Nolan - decent effort, building a system lacked, Bylsma - lack of communication on his end, poor system utilization, no accountability), and the standards for this organization(Terry holds responsibility for this).
Sorry for the Wall of text.