therealkoho
Him/Leaf/fan
they used to say that about Joffrey Lupul, Carlo Colaiacovo and a bunch of others...but!
Rumor: Dhalliwal- 2 Teams AGRESSIVELY after Tanev ( Vanek, Edler rumor as well)
- Thread starter DownGoesMcDavid
- Start date
- Status
they used to say that about Joffrey Lupul, Carlo Colaiacovo and a bunch of others...but!
This was a few weeks ago blocking a shot.
And if It is the Leafs they dont care if he is injured for 3 more weeks.
He will be ready for playoffs and is signed for 3 more yrs on a ridiculously great contract.
Halla
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2016
- 14,727
- 3,779
sure, a simple request to NUCKS FANS: please don't ask for nylander/marner. there is no point
WilliamNylander
Papi's home
- Jul 26, 2012
- 12,896
- 2,608
Halla
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2016
- 14,727
- 3,779
is it ridiculously great though if he only plays 60-70% of the games?
Baxterman
Registered User
- Aug 27, 2017
- 6,939
- 1,499
Great Vancouver source by what metric?
He was the moron that said Troy Brouwer was getting traded. I will always hate him for getting my hopes up on that one. Researching him after that debacle didn't really turn up anything to indicate he was a great source at all.
BlueBaron
Registered User
He sure would improve our look pairing with Rielly, dropping Hainsey to Gardiner and Zaitsev down to Dermott. It would be improvement on every pairing.
I agree that he has had a lot of bad luck with injuries and I think maybe the move to the East and to our medical staff could end his misfortunes.
Benedict Kovalchuk
Kovalchuk: A spy?
Yep buyouts. That’s what I was thinking.
Although most of the time there is a medical but if both teams know it’s ok
The Duck Knight
Henry, you're our only hope!
I wouldn't be surprised if Murray has some interest in both Hutton and Vanek. Maybe something like Ritchie and a conditional 2nd/3rd.
8816 others
Registered User
Given the recent injuries and the play of JVR, I'm not even sure I'd want to see that swap made.
The Leafs seem to be a healthier team than the Canucks the last couple seasons - be it team philosophy, medical facilities/staff, etc. Perhaps he could stay a little healthier or recover faster in Toronto.
The Leafs seem to be a healthier team than the Canucks the last couple seasons - be it team philosophy, medical facilities/staff, etc. Perhaps he could stay a little healthier or recover faster in Toronto.
Did babcock coach Tanev in worlds for Canada? I knoe Mcdavid raved about Tanev the year they played together for Canada.
If Leafs trade for Tanev without giving up roster players then i would put them ahead of Pitt or Tbay as cup favs. Tanev is that good. Can and will be paired to matchup against opponents top line. He also doesnt take penalties despite being a shutdown dman.
The bonus is that Toronto wouls get multiple playoff runs w. Tanev and not just this year. Contract controlled cheap salary for a team needing to pay its young studs too is important.
If Leafs trade for Tanev without giving up roster players then i would put them ahead of Pitt or Tbay as cup favs. Tanev is that good. Can and will be paired to matchup against opponents top line. He also doesnt take penalties despite being a shutdown dman.
The bonus is that Toronto wouls get multiple playoff runs w. Tanev and not just this year. Contract controlled cheap salary for a team needing to pay its young studs too is important.
mattydamon
Registered User
Really hope this doesn't turn into another bash Tanev thread, we've seen enough of those.
Dhaliwal is legit connected in Van - of course it doesn't mean this is going to happen, but it's not like an E3 or something like that.
I enjoy watching both teams and I really do think Tanev would be amazing in TOR, but for sure the 'value' has been hashed over for a year at least and only ends up devolving into a poo flinging contest.
My guess is the 2nd team is a West team, would also love to see a Hutton hockey trade.
Dhaliwal is legit connected in Van - of course it doesn't mean this is going to happen, but it's not like an E3 or something like that.
I enjoy watching both teams and I really do think Tanev would be amazing in TOR, but for sure the 'value' has been hashed over for a year at least and only ends up devolving into a poo flinging contest.
My guess is the 2nd team is a West team, would also love to see a Hutton hockey trade.
LordNeverLose
Registered User
3rd pairing defensemen are not a need. We have more than enough of those.
I think it's more likely Isles are in on Tanev, depending on price.
No but he watched. He was there to scout Matthews. So he saw rielly and Tanev together
Critical13
Fear is the mind-killer.
I think he's a good fit for the Jets. Bump down Myers playing time. Morrissey and Tanev in the top 2 pairings would be a nice stabilizing force.
That is the huge value in a team trading for Tanev now, is that they get 3 playoff runs out of the deal. I don't think the cost to acquire him will change much between now and the draft, so to me it makes a lot of sense. A fracture is not like a concussion or a ligament/muscle injury in that it is pretty easy to recover from, and has a predictable time table to heal.
firstemperor
Registered User
- May 25, 2011
- 8,755
- 1,445
Dhalliwal is a good Canucks guy, he's usually on point with his scoops.
But if Lou is shopping Dermott the other way, I'm going to seriously question his role in this organization.
Liljegren, by himself, is unacceptable.
I wouldn't even pay Kapanen + 1st or anything thereof with his injury history. We'll see what happens.
I like Tanev but the maximum price I would be ok (i.e. not getting up in arms about) giving up is Kapanen/1st and a prospect not named Liljegren.
The maximum price, I would personally be comfortable giving up, would be a 1st and a prospect not named Korshkov, Liljegren, Johnsson, Grundstrom, or Rasanen (note- I don't consider Kapanen, Dermott prospects).
He's a good player, but he's not getting any softer minutes here (they will be a lot tougher, against good teams, more high-event pace, and in the playoffs), and he's simply injured too much for anything more than a buy-low option from the Leafs side of things.
But if Lou is shopping Dermott the other way, I'm going to seriously question his role in this organization.
Liljegren, by himself, is unacceptable.
I wouldn't even pay Kapanen + 1st or anything thereof with his injury history. We'll see what happens.
I like Tanev but the maximum price I would be ok (i.e. not getting up in arms about) giving up is Kapanen/1st and a prospect not named Liljegren.
The maximum price, I would personally be comfortable giving up, would be a 1st and a prospect not named Korshkov, Liljegren, Johnsson, Grundstrom, or Rasanen (note- I don't consider Kapanen, Dermott prospects).
He's a good player, but he's not getting any softer minutes here (they will be a lot tougher, against good teams, more high-event pace, and in the playoffs), and he's simply injured too much for anything more than a buy-low option from the Leafs side of things.
Last edited:
I just hope that if we do trade Tanev, it's only for a gross overpayment. Otherwise I just don't see a point.
The guy stabilizes our entire team. That's gotta help the development of our guys in some way. I'm fine with keeping him unless we're floored by an offer.
The guy stabilizes our entire team. That's gotta help the development of our guys in some way. I'm fine with keeping him unless we're floored by an offer.
Disappointed EP40
Registered User
- Jan 13, 2015
- 3,222
- 1,720
- Status
