Injury Report: Deangelo and Pesce (COVID-19)

[UncMike]

When these guys return, 2of the 3 (Smith, lejoie,Chatfield) will be sent down.....do you think each of onr of these guys will clear waivers or is there 1 you feel would be claimed?

 

[Tryamw]

Chatfield

 

[sheriff bart]

Chatfield

He has impressed me

 

[AhosDatsyukian]

When these guys return, 2of the 3 (Smith, lejoie,Chatfield) will be sent down.....do you think each of onr of these guys will clear waivers or is there 1 you feel would be claimed?

Do they have to clear waivers if they were call ups do to COVID? That seems like bullshit if you ask me...

 

[Nikishin Go Boom]

Do they have to clear waivers if they were call ups do to COVID? That seems like bullshit if you ask me...

Cap friendly doesn’t have them as emergency call ups

 

[Cardiac Jerks]

Do they have to clear waivers if they were call ups do to COVID? That seems like bullshit if you ask me...

 

[cptjeff]

Do they have to clear waivers if they were call ups do to COVID? That seems like bullshit if you ask me...

Waddell should just tell other GMs that Brind'Amour has promised to pull out the old folding chair thing again if any of them submit a claim.

 

[Boom Boom Apathy]

When these guys return, 2of the 3 (Smith, lejoie,Chatfield) will be sent down.....do you think each of onr of these guys will clear waivers or is there 1 you feel would be claimed?

I think if they don’t play 10 games or aren’t on the roster for 30 days, the Canes can send them down without waivers. Smith would probably be he only guy that would need to be waived and I suspect the Canes will not be sending him down anyway.

 

[UncMike]

I think if they don’t play 10 games or aren’t on the roster for 30 days, the Canes can send them down without waivers. Smith would probably be he only guy that would need to be waived and I suspect the Canes will not be sending him down anyway.

The 30 day rule is…….if they have already cleared waivers within the last 30 days, then they are exempt……..Lajoie and Chatfield last cleared waivers in mid October

 

[Boom Boom Apathy]

The 30 day rule is…….if they have already cleared waivers within the last 30 days, then they are exempt……..Lajoie and Chatfield last cleared waivers in mid October

I don't believe that is correct (unless the 2020 addendum changed it). The CBA rule states:

13.2 The "Playing Season Waiver Period" shall begin on the twelfth (12th) day prior to the start of the Regular Season and end on the day following the last day of a Club's Playing Season. Subject to the provisions of this Article, the rights to the services of a Player may be Loaned to a club of another league, upon fulfillment of the following conditions, except when elsewhere expressly prohibited:
(a) Regular Waivers were requested and cleared during the Playing Season Waiver Period; and
(b) the Player has not played in ten (10) or more NHL Games cumulative since Regular Waivers on him were last cleared, and more than thirty (30) days cumulative on an NHL roster have not passed since Regular Waivers on him were last cleared.


It says nothing about about them clearing waivers 30 days ago. The 30 days references time on an NHL roster.

Also, Capfriendly states:
Exemptions

1. A player does not need to pass through waivers if the player has not been on the NHL active roster for a cumulative 30 days since last clearing waivers, and has not played in 10 or more NHL games. CBA Reference 13.2(b)
2. A player whom consented to a Conditioning Loan can be Loaned to a minor league club for a maximum of 14 days without passing through waivers. CBA Reference 13.8
3. A player whom was previously on long-term injured reserve (LTIR), may be loaned to a minor league club for a maximum of 6 days or 3 games for the purpose of determining if the player is fit to play. This player does not need to pass through waivers. CBA Reference 13.9

 

[geehaad]

The 30 day rule is…….if they have already cleared waivers within the last 30 days, then they are exempt……..Lajoie and Chatfield last cleared waivers in mid October

For future reference, this is the "I'm not being serious" emoji:

 

[AhosDatsyukian]

For future reference, this is the "I'm not being serious" emoji:

I thought that was the "I'm posting this to stir shit up" emoji

 

[Anton Dubinchuk]

For future reference, this is the "I'm not being serious" emoji:

I thought that was the "I'm posting this to stir shit up" emoji

I thought it was the "I'm picking my nose" emoji.

 

[UncMike]

I don't believe that is correct (unless the 2020 addendum changed it). The CBA rule states:

13.2 The "Playing Season Waiver Period" shall begin on the twelfth (12th) day prior to the start of the Regular Season and end on the day following the last day of a Club's Playing Season. Subject to the provisions of this Article, the rights to the services of a Player may be Loaned to a club of another league, upon fulfillment of the following conditions, except when elsewhere expressly prohibited:
(a) Regular Waivers were requested and cleared during the Playing Season Waiver Period; and
(b) the Player has not played in ten (10) or more NHL Games cumulative since Regular Waivers on him were last cleared, and more than thirty (30) days cumulative on an NHL roster have not passed since Regular Waivers on him were last cleared.


It says nothing about about them clearing waivers 30 days ago. The 30 days references time on an NHL roster.

Also, Capfriendly states:
Exemptions

1. A player does not need to pass through waivers if the player has not been on the NHL active roster for a cumulative 30 days since last clearing waivers, and has not played in 10 or more NHL games. CBA Reference 13.2(b)
2. A player whom consented to a Conditioning Loan can be Loaned to a minor league club for a maximum of 14 days without passing through waivers. CBA Reference 13.8
3. A player whom was previously on long-term injured reserve (LTIR), may be loaned to a minor league club for a maximum of 6 days or 3 games for the purpose of determining if the player is fit to play. This player does not need to pass through waivers. CBA Reference 13.9

thanks…….the lawyer speak always trips me up

 

[LakeLivin]

For future reference, this is the "I'm not being serious" emoji:

I thought that was the "I'm posting this to stir shit up" emoji

I thought it was the "I'm picking my nose" emoji.

I thought it was the "I've already picked my nose and now I'm eating it" emoji.

 

[hockeynjune]

ewe

 

[LostInaLostWorld]

ewe

 

[LakeLivin]

I thought it was the "I've already picked my nose and now I'm eating it" emoji.

ewe

I'm doing substitute teaching these days. I had a pre-school class today, so . . . lol.

 

[LostInaLostWorld]

I'm doing substitute teaching these days. I had a pre-school class today, so . . . lol.

So you are saying you are a masochist, eh

 

[MisterEd89]

As expected, missing all of the Canada trip. Hopefully, they'll be in for the Minnesota game.

 

[cptjeff]

As expected, missing all of the Canada trip. Hopefully, they'll be in for the Minnesota game.

Goddamn it. I was hoping we'd at least have them for the Edmonton McDavids.

 

[A Star is Burns]

I'm not sure if Brindy will want to put them in for Minny but at least if they are needed they should have plenty of time to ramp things up this week.

 

[Joe McGrath]

I'm not sure if Brindy will want to put them in for Minny but at least if they are needed they should have plenty of time to ramp things up this week.

He said they didn’t have any symptoms so I don’t see why he wouldn’t play them as soon as they are available (the border nonsense notwithstanding)

 

[Unsustainable]

Canadian government colluding to hinder the Canes domination of their teams

 

[A Star is Burns]

He said they didn’t have any symptoms so I don’t see why he wouldn’t play them as soon as they are available (the border nonsense notwithstanding)

I just wasn't sure if he would want them to get in a practice and if they'll have that chance before then. I personally would throw them in, but didn't they wait a game with Bear? I can't remember for sure.