- Dec 10, 2012
- 39,675
- 18,075
I think Bruno wins coach of the year this year but does Dean finish runner up??
Sutter should win that award by a very wide margin.
I think Bruno wins coach of the year this year but does Dean finish runner up??
Props to the coaching staff, the team looked completely different tonight on both the pp and pk.
The blocked shots tonight, the clearing out of the rebounds, all made the team look so much better.
The offense had fewer shots, but they were much more dangerous shots tonight. Husso had to move tonight and just like Flower in game 1, he couldn't move enough to make the difference.
Kulikov didn't play. You mean Goligoski.G1 it was Kulikov/Merrill with the heaviest d-man usage and 9 FWDs. (some of this might have been score related?)
G2 they stuck with the top-4 d-men and 7 FWDs for the PK.
The PP had luck on their side tonight. It was aggressive at times, but still tries to be too pretty/perfect. I still think Spurgeon needs to be the halfwall and not running the point.
Weirdly enough, I thought Goligoski was a nice stabilizing presence tonight.Kulikov didn't play. You mean Goligoski.
He was mostly invisible, which isn't bad for a 3rd pair d-man. He did get that 2 minutes for being Goligoski penalty though, but he's Goligoski... only way he doesn't get that call is if the ref forgets he's on the ice.Weirdly enough, I thought Goligoski was a nice stabilizing presence tonight.
Kulikov didn't play. You mean Goligoski.
Totally agree. A welcome change after Kulikov's Wild Adventure in game 1.Weirdly enough, I thought Goligoski was a nice stabilizing presence tonight.
Kind of agree. Bruno would be a nice story, but Florida was just as good under Quenneville, which puts the doubt in my mind saying that "maybe it's the players making the coaches look good".Sutter should win that award by a very wide margin.
I hate this guy as coach so much...
Deano annoys me with his decisions too, but he just coached this team to a 113 point season. I assume he knows what he’s doing more than I.
Maybe he was telling on himself all those times he said the team takes over during intermission and they figure out what they have to do themselves.
Sort of this. No head coach is ever without their warts, sometimes glaringly obvious ones that, for whatever reason, they can't fix themselves. Lemaire tinkered with the lines too much and didn't let chemistry bloom, Boudreau didn't do line matchups at all (and seemingly lost the room), and Evason doesn't make adjustments quickly enough (if at all).Deano annoys me with his decisions too, but he just coached this team to a 113 point season. I assume he knows what he’s doing more than I.
They're also probably both playing with somewhat significant injuries.Lemaire got us to the WC finals with a pitiful lineup of talent, was a legendary player, and near legendary coach. Putting him and Evason is the same breath is absurd.
You know, i don't think that Lemaire worried about offending his player. He put in who he thought would give him the best chance of winning.
Dumba and Foligno are probably great, friendly guys, and make everything happy in "the room". I really don't give a shit, at this point, because their play on the ice when it counts is ordinary at best. They are anything but leaders, except possibly when it comes to organizing parties and tee times.
Always the same story- you think we are the only team with injuries? Dumba has been a major disappointment since his pec injury, and his present shoulder injury is a result of him taking a needless run at an AHL player.They're also probably both playing with somewhat significant injuries.
No, but the two guys you point to as "not stepping up in the playoffs" are injured. I agree with the rest of your comment.Always the same story- you think we are the only team with injuries? Dumba has been a major disappointment since his pec injury, and his present shoulder injury is a result of him taking a needless run at an AHL player.
Not sure what Dumba and Foligno have to do with the coach. Evason gets into the same breath as Lemaire because they've both been head coaches of the Wild with winning records, and not a reason other. Still, people found something to complain about with Lemaire. That's the point.Lemaire got us to the WC finals with a pitiful lineup of talent, was a legendary player, and near legendary coach. Putting him and Evason is the same breath is absurd.
You know, i don't think that Lemaire worried about offending his player. He put in who he thought would give him the best chance of winning.
Dumba and Foligno are probably great, friendly guys, and make everything happy in "the room". I really don't give a shit, at this point, because their play on the ice when it counts is ordinary at best. They are anything but leaders, except possibly when it comes to organizing parties and tee times.
the one in game adjustment they did make was dumping it in higher to prevent Binnington from playing it. seemed to work a bit but i agree he is not making much if any adjustments and his lineup is questionable along with its deployment. i am all for having 4 quality lines rolling but in a 2-2 game you dont trot the 4th line out there often if at all. kap should be on the ice every other 30-45 seconds when he is your only electric player and clearly was going last night.He’s been outclassed by Berube so far. For as excellent as Evason is at motivating the troops and getting the most out of players, he seems equally bad at the Xs & Os. We never make in game adjustments.
Case in point - why do we continue to dump the Puck in when Binnington is handling it like a boss? Why do our special teams continue to be brutal? Why does our 4th line contribute zero offense when Bjugstad & Dewar are there on the bench and capable of much more than DLo or Duhaime?