He'll be the right shot Roman Josi is my prediction
He’ll be the right shot David Reinbacher is my prediction…He'll be the right shot Roman Josi is my prediction
He'll be the right shot Roman Josi is my prediction
Thats a tall order for Reinbacher. I've only watched him in the AHL and I don't see that offensive upside yet but he needs to adjust to a new environment. I hope you are right!Dobson or Josi works for me. I hope Reinbacher has the chance to develop in piece though.
Look at numbers in Swiss league. I hope you like sauce on your hatNorris trophy winning Roman Josi? 96 point season Roman Josi?
If he becomes that good of a player, I'll eat my f***ing hat.
Your player evaluation is second to none after all.Look at numbers in Swiss league. I hope you like sauce on your hat
One of the worst talent evaluators / trade value discussers on the entire site , no disrespect intendedYour player evaluation is second to none after all.
The habs coaches and fans have overrated effort vs skill. Most of these guys were victims of incompetence, though:Poor man's Nathan Beaulieu
Jokes aside, the last time we properly developed a good D we low balled him and ran him out of the city.
This organisation does not know how to develop Defencemen.
Chelios - Ran him out of town, won a Norris, was a good D for us... i always forget he was a hab once
Malakhov - Ran him out of town
Markov - Exception, din't speak english
Hainsey - He came, he left
Komisarek - After the Lucic fight... donzo.
McDonagh - We din't develop him
Tinordi - Chased him out
Beaulieu - Nate the Great
Which one of these players had a long lasting succesful career in montreal?
Markov, thats it
Reinbach OrrDobby Orr
Yup spot on. So many similarities it's crazy. And people think that's setting the bar too high lmao like get real this kids a studbobby orr
Meaner than HeiskanenI stay with Heiskanen comparable.
They utilize their long stick in defensive zone very similar.
They rush the attack very similar.
They think the game very similar aswell.
I don't see why some people don't think they are very very similar players.
For Heiskanen last year with 70 pts... his last 3-4 seasons, he don't put that type of number. (30-40 points).
He will not be surprised if Reinbacher put that type of numbers after 3-4 NHL seasons. Habs will become a better team and he have elite transition game aswell.
Reinbacher have better rookie year in Europ than Heiskanen, I don't said that he is going to reach his level, but the potential is there and they play very similar game to me.
Poor man's Nathan Beaulieu
Jokes aside, the last time we properly developed a good D we low balled him and ran him out of the city.
This organisation does not know how to develop Defencemen.
Chelios - Ran him out of town, won a Norris, was a good D for us... i always forget he was a hab once
Malakhov - Ran him out of town
Markov - Exception, din't speak english
Hainsey - He came, he left
Komisarek - After the Lucic fight... donzo.
McDonagh - We din't develop him
Tinordi - Chased him out
Beaulieu - Nate the Great
Which one of these players had a long lasting succesful career in montreal?
Markov, thats it
This one is the winner for me.Reinbach Orr
Chelios « bad knees » is just a cover up for his off ice wild behaviour in MTL…...The habs coaches and fans have overrated effort vs skill. Most of these guys were victims of incompetence, though:
Chelios - the GM was told his knees wouldn't last and he should trade him while he had value.
Malakhov - great skill, effort was questioned and he got dumped
Markov - the team actually worked through his weak defense his first few years and developed him.
Hainsey - skill, effort questioned early in his career, habs couldn't evaluate D by the late '90s.
Komisarek - great effort, low skill, vastly overrated, done after Lucic fight.
McDonagh - badly evaluated and dumped
Tinordi - overrated prior to draft, damaged by Lefebvre, league sped up and he didnt.
Bealieu - Low effort, low intelligence... He was fast, he'd fight, he needed development, he got Sly.
Habs management was mediocre or worse from the last cup, or even before that, until, possibly, the last couple of years. The habs made a litany of mistakes with most of the list other than Markov, though some would be debatable. It's possible, for example, that Hainsey would not have developed without being dumped by the habs and realizing he needed to change his attitude, but who knows? There were definitely mistakes.
It's too early in the Hughes/Gorton years to know for sure if they have botched evaluations or development yet, but so far the indications are good. Most of their prospects have done well. Reinbacher looks good, in spite of his last year with Kloten, and there is no reason to think that they will destroy him or dump him. Next year will be tough, there isn't space for everyone they would like to keep so there will be a lot of opportunities for errors, trading the wrong guy, losing the wrong guy on waivers, but there is a chance that they have broken with the incompetence that has defined habs management for 3 decades. There have been dramatic organizational changes, especially on the development side, and Reinbacher should benefit.
So he’s a good pick so far after reading you the lasts pages …..
As of right now, what do you think his floor/ceiling could be?too early to say but he was always a safe bet to make the NHL, just a question of how good will he be.
Except non of the people who dealt or developed with these are still hab.Poor man's Nathan Beaulieu
Jokes aside, the last time we properly developed a good D we low balled him and ran him out of the city.
This organisation does not know how to develop Defencemen.
Chelios - Ran him out of town, won a Norris, was a good D for us... i always forget he was a hab once
Malakhov - Ran him out of town
Markov - Exception, din't speak english
Hainsey - He came, he left
Komisarek - After the Lucic fight... donzo.
McDonagh - We din't develop him
Tinordi - Chased him out
Beaulieu - Nate the Great
Which one of these players had a long lasting succesful career in montreal?
Markov, thats it