- Jan 29, 2003
- 25,480
- 20,912
The title of that article should have read:
NHL Will Not Take Advantage Of Call By Inept Referee To Suspend Bruins Backes
I’ll believe Joey Mac over Haggs any day
100% agree.They should have minutes after it was issued and allowed Backes to return!
Why do I feel the NHL is just waiting and sticking their finger in the wind to see how to decide.
Or is it Seguin?Kessel is still the best 40 goal scorer never to have scored 40 goals.
WAHOOOOO!
Backes really needs to start improving on his 28 goals in 123 Bruins games. I love the intangibles he brings, the physical game..., but he's fallen off a cliff goal scoring wise.
I'm curious what kind of goal production you'd like to see from him at this point
His 18 goal pace is a little below his career average but his shooting percentage is down a couple of ticks and he's playing almost 3 fewer minutes than he played in St. Louis
Backes really needs to start improving on his 28 goals in 123 Bruins games. I love the intangibles he brings, the physical game..., but he's fallen off a cliff goal scoring wise.
For $6 million per year, it's fair to expect more offence from Backes.
with all due respect that was not a penalty in any way shape or form.Most the experts I saw said penalty was fine but they thought he wouldn't be suspended . I obviously don't always agree with experts but in this case I think it could've been a 2 or a 5 . By giving the guy an instigator it made it a three minute no biggie .
How does todays decision go with all the conspiracy against us people ? Marchand also didn't get a call and although I 100 percent believe that was an accident and the right call for one million percent sure I am pretty sure they could've suspended him since there was a lot of silly Nhl talk it was on purpose .