Chris Hansen
THESE LEGS ARE FRESH
- Aug 17, 2007
- 10,535
- 0
Don't get how you can say losing a third liner didn't make a big difference when he played on the second line with Kane and Hoss every game before his injury and the team took an immediate spiral downward following his injury.
The team spiraled because the defense was bleeding scoring chances and Crawford/Emery couldn't stop anything. Plus the team as a whole played with a rather general lack of heart. The blame for that falls on the players themselves, the coaching staff, and, of course, the team leaders. Again, if losing Dan Carcillo has such a tremendous impact on a team, then I'm very surprised as to why there weren't a slew of firings following last season. A team should not collapse just because a third/fourth line tweener who can play top-6 minutes if necessary got hurt. Fortunately that's not why the Hawks struggled. Carcillo? Seriously?
The Hawks fell in the standings because the roster was that of an average playoff team (as opposed to a #1 seed in the conference, as they were at the time) and because the coaching was absolutely brutal. In conjunction with the former, the team's defensive woes and bad goaltending manifested themselves after being masked for the first chunk of the season. It just so happened that Carcillo got hurt at the same time. He was not a player who potentially would have mitigated the team's flaws (such as, say, a Henrik Lundqvist), nor was he a player responsible for the team's strengths (offense).
Carcillo is a bottom-six player who was thrown with Kane and Hossa because the Hawks lacked top-six talent outside the big four. He played adequately. The line functioned because it had two elite players, not because Carcillo was some wonder being.