Rumor: Dallas very interested in Seth Jones, John Klingberg in discussions

NYVanfan

Registered User
Mar 27, 2002
6,955
479
Visit site
Jones is a coming UFA, so what are the chances he extends in Van?

i dunno, are they markedly worse vs elsewhere?

next summer the canucks shed $15M in garbage cap in Ericksson, Beagle, Roussel and Luongo (can you believe we're still paying for that guy?) ... so shouldnt be impossible, and they definitely need D help
 

Burke the Legend

Registered User
Feb 22, 2012
8,317
2,850
Klingberg is better.

Seth Jones reputation is mystifying.

He built his reputation during Columbus' big playoff wins against Toronto and Tampa. He hasn't really been a consistent world beater outside of that. I think there's also an element of his original draft hype where there were serious debates of Jones vs McKinnon as #1.
 

NYVanfan

Registered User
Mar 27, 2002
6,955
479
Visit site
If im CBJ, Klingberg doesnt work for me, good as he is. This will be a years-long rebuild, need <25 guys
Kling 29 next summer and a UFA, how does that help them?
If I'm BJs I ask for Harley-Robertson (sounds cool too)
 

Frozen Failure

They got business in my hockey, and I hate it.
Nov 13, 2007
7,003
392
DFW
I take Jones at whatever equivalent dollars over Klingberg. Love Klingberg but I think the whole Jones package makes Dallas better as an actual hockey team.
 

Magic Mittens

Registered User
Nov 2, 2006
6,923
3,224
Calgary
i dunno, are they markedly worse vs elsewhere?

next summer the canucks shed $15M in garbage cap in Ericksson, Beagle, Roussel and Luongo (can you believe we're still paying for that guy?) ... so shouldnt be impossible, and they definitely need D help

Someone on here was saying Jones won’t sign with a Canadian team. Not sure how true that is, just passing it on
 

serp

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
20,715
12,641


Friedman didn't say that. He said that teams asked Dallas if they would move Klingberg in the case he wouldn't sign. He did not say he thinks Stars can't sign Klingberg just that teams asked about that.
 

OgeeOgelthorpe

Baldina
Feb 29, 2020
17,209
18,332
Isn't Klingberg a UFA in a year? How does this possibly make sense for CBJ? Are both Klingberg and Jones signing extensions with their new teams? I have never seen that before in a trade.

There's gotta be more assets moving than Klingberg for Jones.

Klingberg + Gurianov (or something similar?)

for

Jones
 

Rabid Ranger

2 is better than one
Feb 27, 2002
31,139
11,171
Murica
He built his reputation during Columbus' big playoff wins against Toronto and Tampa. He hasn't really been a consistent world beater outside of that. I think there's also an element of his original draft hype where there were serious debates of Jones vs McKinnon as #1.

I wouldn't say that's true. He had an excellent four year stretch until this year. The question is whether this year was an outlier or a sign of things to come. Again, this is a player that has much more value in NHL circles than on HF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OgeeOgelthorpe

serp

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
20,715
12,641
There's gotta be more assets moving than Klingberg for Jones.

Klingberg + Gurianov (or something similar?)

for

Jones

They're pretty close in value imho. The difference is in well re-signabilty. I'd add conditional picks if Jones re-signs but nothing guaranteed until Jones is extended. Other roster players would not be part of the deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FirstRowUpperDeck

MrHeiskanen

Registered User
Nov 12, 2017
12,322
9,823
They're pretty close in value imho. The difference is in well re-signabilty. I'd add conditional picks if Jones re-signs but nothing guaranteed until Jones is extended. Other roster players would not be part of the deal.

Yup. I think based on reading this thread any reasonable person would come to that conclusion. 50% of the people post that Klingberg is better, 50% of the people post that Jones is better.

Pretty much summarizes they are very close in value.
 

cwede

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 1, 2010
9,804
7,683
... I'd add conditional picks if Jones re-signs but nothing guaranteed until Jones is extended. ...
Not sure such condition still allowed, related rules changed recently
 

TSA0402

Registered User
Apr 4, 2011
5,867
535
Ottawa
I'd rather keep Seth as a ufa than klingberg. Even the possibility of extending klingberg gotta come at a high price tag. Not to mention Werenski and him is shades of Karlsson and Burns. Might be the best retool option though...
 

BfantZ

Registered User
Jun 22, 2017
2,636
1,145
Yup. I think based on reading this thread any reasonable person would come to that conclusion. 50% of the people post that Klingberg is better, 50% of the people post that Jones is better.

Pretty much summarizes they are very close in value.
Nobody’s really saying anything bad about klingberg though . A few cbj fans have some serious criticism for Jones though . Worry’s me a bit .
 

Smart Alek

Registered User
Jul 13, 2002
1,014
665
He built his reputation during Columbus' big playoff wins against Toronto and Tampa. He hasn't really been a consistent world beater outside of that. I think there's also an element of his original draft hype where there were serious debates of Jones vs McKinnon as #1.

That's all this is: Draft hype, and the expected potential that comes with it..

I love Seth Jones as a player, but in no world would I rate him above Klingberg, either offensively or defensively.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad