I'm in agreement with this.
Love it
No, they just don't want to be told what to do. They want it even less since they put a vaccine passport, feeling like they're being cornered into it.Well...basically they don't do it because they are afraid of the government?
Same thing for me. They are afraid of something that makes them refuse the vaccine
My Flurona! That could be a hit!
The f*** is this bullshit lol.. Flurona... It's just two infections at once. The title makes it sound like the two viruses recombined (which would be impossible).
Jesus...
No, they just don't want to be told what to do. They want it even less since they put a vaccine passport, feeling like they're being cornered into it.
It's not. Quebec releases data every day. Today's data shows that in the last 28 days, the fully-vax who are 76% of the population represented 78% of cases and 63% of hospitalisations and 50% of intensive care.
View attachment 495904
No, they just don't want to be told what to do. They want it even less since they put a vaccine passport, feeling like they're being cornered into it.
There's a number I don't get. From the chart;
Rate of unvaxxed hospitalized per 100k-28days : 1.90
Rate of vaxxed hospitalized per 100k-28days : 0.92
So unvaxxed are 2.07 times (1.90/0.92) more likely to get hospitalized.
Why does it say Risk of hospitalization for unvaxxed: 7.9 times?
The data right now is just not reliable.
1- We know that there's a ton more cases that are not calculated
2- We know that 30-40% are not there because of covid but for other reason. We don't know which one
I'm not doing that, I'm double vaxxed...getting my booster asap. I'm just explaining to Millhouse, it's not just people who are scared. Some are just rebellious.Rage against the machine amirite?!?? f*** the establishment!!! Sounds like something I would have thought I was cool for doing at 14. People are dying. You’re not proving a point.
Weren't these things true before Omicron too? We always calculated less cases than there really are. And weren't people who were hospitalized for whatever reasons but had Covid counted as Covid hospitalization too? Why would they change the way they calculate hospitalization now?
Like before if you were hospitalized for broken arm and had Covid, they didn't count it as Covid hospitalization? But now they do?
Weren't these things true before Omicron too? We always calculated less cases than there really are. And weren't people who were hospitalized for whatever reasons but had Covid counted as Covid hospitalization too? Why would they change the way they calculate hospitalization now?
Like before if you were hospitalized for broken arm and had Covid, they didn't count it as Covid hospitalization? But now they do?
Wait, unvaxxed are 0.7 times more likely to get an infection.. does it mean they actually are LESS likely to get an infection, since 1 would be equal chances.
Absolutely. How I rate/track what's happening currently....The data right now is just not reliable.
1- We know that there's a ton more cases that are not calculated
2- We know that 30-40% are not there because of covid but for other reason. We don't know which one
The days of having a good picture of the situation are now gone
Omicron just changed the game, we need to change ours especially in trying to track this thing.
Some healthy young men that have recovered from covid have weighed the benefits of the supposed extra protection that comes from vaccination vs their own healthy natural immunity.
They looked at the data, and felt that it's not conclusive long-term evidence.
Unvaccinated people never weighed the benefits or looked at data. The evidence is clear and overwhelming; anti-vaxers simply ignore it. Weighing all the data would force anti-vaxers to change their minds. But of course they can NEVER change their minds, because being anti-vax isn't an informed conclusion, it's a fashion statement.