Ledge And Dairy
Registered User
Hanifin should be priority #2 to extend this summer. Why wpuld trading him help the team in the short run?A Hanifin trade would be a life-saver for this team's small window
Hanifin should be priority #2 to extend this summer. Why wpuld trading him help the team in the short run?A Hanifin trade would be a life-saver for this team's small window
I think there’s a slim chance we can rebound, as long as we don’t get Huberdeau’s worst season since 2013, Markstrom’s worst year of his career, Mangiapane’s worst year of his career, Tanev playing injured all year, Kylington taking the year off for personal reasons, Andersson doesn’t get hit by a car, most one goal losses, worst/second worst OT record, most posts, least comebacks, worst shooting percentage, most…Is there any chance Calgary can rebound with this team next year and this season was just a result of adjusting to the losses of Tkachuk and Gaudreau? Because those were demoralizing even with their new additions, I can see that ruining their hopes for a year.
Taylor Hall is a first line guy playing on the third line and might be available
Agreed. I see Pelletier and Zary as middle 6 guys. Coronato as top 6 with Toffoli being a comparable. There's no top players in our system except maybe Wolf.I think they will be solid NHLers, but the guy was talking about top 6-10 picks
The Flames definitely need some top picks to rebuild soon
Agreed mostly. Depends on the contract ask though. If the number starts with a 7 I'd move on from him. I think he's a better player than people give him credit for, but we need to get value from him either through a value extension or by getting assets back.Hanifin should be priority #2 to extend this summer. Why wpuld trading him help the team in the short run?
I would be perfectly fine giving him the Weegar deal or similar. He's a similar player to Pulock in both style and skill so I would base it around that dealAgreed. I see Pelletier and Zary as middle 6 guys. Coronato as top 6 with Toffoli being a comparable. There's no top players in our system except maybe Wolf.
Agreed mostly. Depends on the contract ask though. If the number starts with a 7 I'd move on from him. I think he's a better player than people give him credit for, but we need to get value from him either through a value extension or by getting assets back.
This............Sutter is a great short term coach but his style wears on players.
It's time for him to go
Only if you tell him not to ride scootersRasmus Andersson to the Red Wings please and thanks.
Rasmus Andersson to the Red Wings please and thanks.
Yup, that would be fine. Anything that starts with a 7 has no value in it. Better to trade him at that point. He's the right age for a LT deal at least. Not 32 like Kadri or 30 like Huberdeau. I hate Norman so much for forcing Treliving into those stupid contracts.I would be perfectly fine giving him the Weegar deal or similar. He's a similar player to Pulock in both style and skill so I would base it around that deal
When did I say they were blue chip? I said they were likely better than what you'd get from a pick 10th or worse. Blue chip prospects typically come in the top 4. Sure you can get lucky and pull one at the 10+ range but that's not the norm. In that range you're typically looking at guys with serious NHL potential who are most likely to be solid depth guys or lower end top line forwards.Since when Phillips is as good as the top 10 pick? Coronato, Zary and Pelt are Ok prospects but they are not blue chips neither
Hockey gods I don’t ask you for much…and god knows I don’t get it…but please get Weegar to Buffalo
Because he's not that good lol. He's an average 2nd pairing dman. If he can bring back a top-6 F or 1st+, you take it and run. He is replaceable.Hanifin should be priority #2 to extend this summer. Why wpuld trading him help the team in the short run?
You'd be comfortable paying Hanifin 6.5? Even 6? That is way too rich for a #3 LD with limited offensive upside. I don't hate Hanifin but that money should be better spent elsewhere. Boston can't afford Grzelcyk at 3.6875 past this year and just signed Hampus Lindholm (who is miles better than Hanifin) to 6.5. Kings just signed Mikey Anderson (a similar 2nd pairing LD) to 8 years at 4.125. Golden Knights just signed Brayden McNabb for 3x2.85. Colorado signed Girard (coming off of a better season than Hanifin has ever had) 2 summers ago 7 yrs 5 mil. Morrissey (who is miles better) at 6.25. Cernak 5.2x8.Agreed. I see Pelletier and Zary as middle 6 guys. Coronato as top 6 with Toffoli being a comparable. There's no top players in our system except maybe Wolf.
Agreed mostly. Depends on the contract ask though. If the number starts with a 7 I'd move on from him. I think he's a better player than people give him credit for, but we need to get value from him either through a value extension or by getting assets back.
That is an absurd overvaluation of Hanifin. Pulock is a 1D who anchored a D core to back to back ECF's, within one game of the Cup Finals. Playing over 22 mins a night, anchoring the PK and playing top-pairing night-in night-out. When Tanev went down in the playoffs last year our whole D crumbled and we added Weegar to shore up the left side. Hanifin is currently probably our 4th best dman, arguably 5th if Kylington were in town. Pulock as a comparable isn't even close. Better comparables are McNabb, Mikey Anderson, and (on the higher-end) Girard. I bet if you ask Isles fans if Hanifin and Pulock are comparable they'd laugh.I would be perfectly fine giving him the Weegar deal or similar. He's a similar player to Pulock in both style and skill so I would base it around that deal
No you said outside of top 6 and you included Phillips, that’s ridiculous.When did I say they were blue chip? I said they were likely better than what you'd get from a pick 10th or worse. Blue chip prospects typically come in the top 4. Sure you can get lucky and pull one at the 10+ range but that's not the norm. In that range you're typically looking at guys with serious NHL potential who are most likely to be solid depth guys or lower end top line forwards.
I made two statements. I did they have some good prospects you'd not see outside of the top six. I then or Phillips on a list outside of the top 10.No you said outside of top 6 and you included Phillips, that’s ridiculous.
None of them have shown anything to move them into the top 10 even in their own draft
Except for Phillips, they are good prospects but you are overrating them big time
Yes. Yes, he would.Why? He would be like your 4th best defenseman -