Caper Bruins fan
Registered User
I would like to see what Carl could do playing with a real speed demon,he is such a good passer I think he could spring a guy loose and we would be off to the races .Kelly and Cunningham is not a good fit.
Just when doubt was creeping in he turns in a great game like this.
When Keejci plays .83 PPG and without him .55. That is amazing but tells us our third line center projects as a 65 point player with 37 & 46 in lineup
Just when doubt was creeping in he turns in a great game like this.
When Keejci plays .83 PPG and without him .55. That is amazing but tells us our third line center projects as a 65 point player with 37 & 46 in lineup
While I do see the hard numbers that support the claim that he does better on the 3rd....and of course he would....he is, on the average, much better than what most teams have on their 3rd lines.
I will say this however, during the time that DK was out, Yeti was playing with an assortment of wingers. Also players do go through slumps...so who knows...he may have been in a slump....or he may just not be top 6 material yet.
There's an argument to be made that when the team is firing on all cylinders we actually have a pair of "first lines" in Krejci's and Bergeron's lines (1A & 1B) and that Soderberg's line is functionally equivalent to a solid second line. I do think he gets exposed a bit when one of the other two top centers goes missing. So there's that. Is he a bonafide 2nd line Center? I think that remains to be seen.While I do see the hard numbers that support the claim that he does better on the 3rd....and of course he would....he is, on the average, much better than what most teams have on their 3rd lines.
There's an argument to be made that when the team is firing on all cylinders we actually have a pair of "first lines" in Krejci's and Bergeron's lines (1A & 1B) and that Soderberg's line is functionally equivalent to a solid second line. I do think he gets exposed a bit when one of the other two top centers goes missing. So there's that. Is he a bonafide 2nd line Center? I think that remains to be seen.
Yeah, I think so. I think we saw that during Krejci's hiatus. I think having Bergy and Krejci centering those top two lines protects Soderberg, keeps him from being exposed to other team's top lines, regardless of how he compares to the example centers you provided.Does it?
Hanzal, Dubinsky, Coyle, Plek's, Nelson, Zibanejad, Scheifele, Bonino, Zajac, Fisher, Stepan etc....
I don't have too much trouble measuring Soderberg up to that caliber of player, do you? Those are pretty typical #2C's...
There's an argument to be made that when the team is firing on all cylinders we actually have a pair of "first lines" in Krejci's and Bergeron's lines (1A & 1B) and that Soderberg's line is functionally equivalent to a solid second line. I do think he gets exposed a bit when one of the other two top centers goes missing. So there's that. Is he a bonafide 2nd line Center? I think that remains to be seen.
Perhaps. It's not like I completely dismissed it. But he definitely had a chance to show it in Krejci's absence and I don't think he did. He and Looch struggled with similar line mates to what Krejci and Looch had/have. I certainly wouldn't NOT give him another chance. I just think the jury's still out on it is all.I have no doubt Soderberg could succeed as a #2 with two Top 6 wings.
Perhaps. It's not like I completely dismissed it. But he definitely had a chance to show it in Krejci's absence and I don't think he did. He and Looch struggled with similar line mates to what Krejci and Looch had/have. I certainly wouldn't NOT give him another chance. I just think the jury's still out on it is all.
Perhaps. It's not like I completely dismissed it. But he definitely had a chance to show it in Krejci's absence and I don't think he did. He and Looch struggled with similar line mates to what Krejci and Looch had/have. I certainly wouldn't NOT give him another chance. I just think the jury's still out on it is all.
There has to be an ultimatum for Yeti to sign his extension. If he's not signed at the deadline, Chiarelli has to trade him. He would most likely be target #1 on the market with his skills and low Cap hit so we could get quite the assets in return.
Priority #1 is still to sign him but if that can't be done, they have to trade him. Then either give his 3rd line spot to Koko/Spooner or get someone else in a separate trade.
If he's signed, then trade at least 1 of Koko/Spooner for a comparable W or D prospect.
He has the best production on the team and the second highest +/-. Say what you want about those stats, but he simply produces opportunities and is decent defensively.
Give him first line minutes, first line talent with him (for example: Marchand and Smith. Obviously breaking up the Bergeron line would be silly, but let's face it, he plays with Kelly. God love him, he's a decent player, but a true 3rd liner), and put him up against better competition and I wouldn't be surprised--in the least--if he kept the same edge in both categories or only fell to the level of Krejci and Bergeron.
The guy simply shows up game after game, which is much more than can be said for some of the Bruins (ahem, you all know who).
Pay the man
Serious question, what is it going to take to keep the Yeti? Money, not resigning someone what?
He's been one player for me this year that tries to give it every night he's out there. Really seems to me like they could find a way to retain him.
I go three years about $9-10 and the one guy I would actually give a NMC to
That seems more then reasonable to me. I don't see him taking that though.
You can't pay your third line center to me $4-5 M especially when you have offensive type cheap high draft picks ready
I want Soda but 3 years limit and under $4 m
If he leaves I plan/hope that I can add Koko & Pasta to that third line and top 9 and now the Bruins just got younger with a bleep load of skill - add a few young defenseman to the system via draft and this thing can reload quick and give us something to look forward to