dingbatz
Registered User
- Apr 20, 2013
- 3,113
- 29
Stuck at work - couldn't watch. Made my night seeing that - thanks for the link, ding
Not a problem.
Stuck at work - couldn't watch. Made my night seeing that - thanks for the link, ding
You know...sometimes I feel like HF Sens is a bit too negative. Then I take a look at the Canucks board after Wideman scored. Jeeez.
Top pair looked great, but we still can't seem to get any sustained pressure without Karlsson on the ice.
We looked ok in our end though with less running around aside from a shift or two, but we need to start winning the battles in their end and get them tired instead of having to defend so much,
much better effort, but we got lucky too. One post, one shot that boro saved were the difference. I liked all 4 offensive lines. Wasn't able to concentrate too much though cause gf kept talking to me. :d
Anyone else think we might have won last game as well with Wideman instead of Wiercioch?
Was very excited to see the win after my own hockey.
Glad Wideman got another goal (thanks for the vid). And what i saw of Karlsson tonight was so refreshing.
Team looked like they at least were fighting for the win. And didn't just flop with the lead too much.
Thank goodness!
Anyone else think we might have won last game as well with Wideman instead of Wiercioch?
Probably not. Other than Boro (who is worse than the rest of them), the bottom 5 D on this team are equally bad, and shuffling them around has basically no effect.
Before anyone says the team played better this game, they still got outpossessed, outshot, outmuscled, outhustled, and just plain outplayed. Goaltending carried them through, just like it has in basically every other win this season. The team is bad, and Wiercioch isn't the reason. It's a team-wide thing, and I find it weird that everyone's singling him out when Cowen, Wier, and Ceci have all been terrible as well. Of the bunch, Boro is probably the worst, but there's definitely not a large gap.
Isn't that our tactic ? Didn't people analyze this last year, and basically attributed the entire Hammond run on the fact that he gives up rebounds right into the slot, and since we always collapse, we get possession a lot of the time.For what its worth, at one point during the game, the announcers said that Ottawa was doing a good job of boxing out the Canucks so that most of there shots came from the perimeter. In other words, the Sens didn't really give up many dangerous chances.
Can anyone post a graph of where the shots came from?
Still need to fix the shots against though.
For what its worth, at one point during the game, the announcers said that Ottawa was doing a good job of boxing out the Canucks so that most of there shots came from the perimeter. In other words, the Sens didn't really give up many dangerous chances.
Can anyone post a graph of where the shots came from?
Still need to fix the shots against though.
We have a perfect record in games where Wiercioch is scratched, heh.
He'll probably slot back in next game lol.
Ryan is on a rollll!
Yeah.....they really don't seem to care for Elder...or Hamhuis all that much. Remember that, folks, on the trade boards!
One step forward: Wiercioch scratched.Also, Prince should be back in. Puempel didn't do much on that line. He just doesn't fit with Zib and Ryan.
Isn't that our tactic ? Didn't people analyze this last year, and basically attributed the entire Hammond run on the fact that he gives up rebounds right into the slot, and since we always collapse, we get possession a lot of the time.
While Andy, who is a much better goalie technically, kicks his rebounds (when realistically possible) to the corners, where our guys never go, so we end up chasing everyone in our own zone?
I distinctly remember that being a thing and then telling a coworker about it.
It also explained why Hammond sucks in all other leagues but is somehow a god on the Sens (who are too lazy to move out of the slot)