Ah, the classic responses. I admit Rakell isn’t a good target cause of the contract situation u guys are right we’d need an RW w more term. But what I think is the most funny is that I have advocated for a full rebuild for over a season, to which you both specifically have said ‘we just signed Tanev and Markstrom to compete, we can’t do that! Now I’m making a proposal to re-tool, and you guys say I’m shuffling deck chairs. Lol. It’s literally gotta be one or the other. I admit we’d need more value than Rakell and if I was brad I wouldn’t pull trig on deal 2. Having said that deal 1 (Monahan for picks+prospects) and 3 (Backlund+pick for Dumba) and signing Danault will 100% make us a better team in the future without a masssive sacrifice right now. Isn’t that exactly what we all want? I honestly still think we should sell even more and fully rebuild cause we’re absolutely awful, but I understand management might not want that/ might not be feasible with some of our vet guys. So I’m proposing a re-tool/ shuffling of the deck chairs, which you guys specifically have told me is the only way for us to make changes. So before I go on justifying why I’d make these deals cause it’s some of the best value we can get for Monahan and Backlund, please let me know what you guys would do if you were brad. I see you guys shoot down 95% of proposals (which is totally fine I get you guys are very risk averse), but it’s at the point where we all know we have to do something. So again, what would you guys actually do if you were brad?