C Jack Hughes - USNTDP (2019, 1st, NJD) Part 6

TrufleShufle

Registered User
Aug 31, 2012
7,818
12,202
Umm, a bunch of posters said this, and I caught flack for suggesting it wasn't true. I mean, I said to a bunch he wasn't on the same tier as Matthews, Eichel and Dahlin, and I can remember the push back.

The thing is though, I repeatedly said no scout was saying these things all of last year and got significant push back. I remember Devil's fans getting pissy when I said hope to expect a Marner or Barzal type player after the lottery. Being told to expect a Patrick Kane like player, who was a 70 point player in year one. So, now that he's shown in year one he wasn't near generational like some people in this thread were trying to throw around all of last year, outside opinions don't matter? Fine. I'm not saying you did this, but to not act like people did is mis-representing my original point.
Again, my only point was, “nobody who mattered, said that.” That’s it.

I won’t argue or try to refute anything else you said.
 

Hockey Man

Registered User
Jun 21, 2019
162
73
i personally believed that hughes shouldve been given a year in college hockey prior to coming into the NHL. i personally felt that his size, lack of strength, and junior hockey habits would limit his effectiveness in year one to an extent that he wouldve seen better progression while playing a year in the NCAA. he could’ve continued to post very good offensive numbers whilst having to focus on the defensive side of the game more, and adjust to playing bigger, faster, stronger, smarter players, and of course an opportunity to compete with a winning team for a championship. i also held the belief that if hughes had to play this year in the NHL, he shouldve played it on the wings, not at center.

of course this wouldn’t happen because the optics of having a first overall pick not come directly into the league wouldve been awful. i was attacked for voicing these opinions in the devils boards prior to the start of the season. many people absolutely believed, especially devils fans, that jack hughes would be able to post 50+ points this season. i still believe jack hughes has the potential to be an elite player in the NHL, but obviously he will need some time to get there.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
33,789
30,152
Except your argument was easy if it was average. Which it wouldn't be. 8.5% is above average and even that only pushes it about to 40. You are expecting another 10 points to materialize out of optimism. Look, he is statistically under-achieving given what he is generating, you are just oign to far in the opposite direction.

Average puck luck for skilled players implies a greater than average oish.

But maybe you're right. Eye test tells me he should have ~10 more points. That would put him right around 47 point pace. Perhaps I should have said "if the bounces were going the other way" he'd easily have 50 points. But honestly, if he was having good luck he could be closer to 55-60 point pace.

ES oish of 5.25% is pretty brutal.
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
33,991
21,082
Toronto
Again, my only point was, “nobody who mattered, said that.” That’s it.

I won’t argue or try to refute anything else you said.
You also said this was the season people were expecting, I can't find a bunch of experts saying that. Which it isn't. I pointed that out through the people who I quoted. Do you seriously think people were expecting him to play at a 35 point pace? Have the worst actual production for a 1st overall forward since 2005? I've acknowledged there were underlying reasons and he's not getting bounces, but, saying this was expected is going too far the other way to downplay this season's production.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deflowd and Garyboy

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
33,991
21,082
Toronto
Average puck luck for skilled players implies a greater than average oish.

But maybe you're right. Eye test tells me he should have ~10 more points. That would put him right around 47 point pace. Perhaps I should have said "if the bounces were going the other way" he'd easily have 50 points. But honestly, if he was having good luck he could be closer to 55-60 point pace.

ES oish of 5.25% is pretty brutal.
The thing is, 8.5% isn't completely out of line with elite players on average. Even if you bump it to 9%, that is essentially one point at 5v5 with the chances he is generating. I get he doesn't have a solid trigger-man at 5v5 and Devil's aren't a team that is good at finishing at 5v5 or on the PP.
 

TrufleShufle

Registered User
Aug 31, 2012
7,818
12,202
You also said this was the season people were expecting, I can't find a bunch of experts saying that. Which it isn't. I pointed that out through the people who I quoted. Do you seriously think people were expecting him to play at a 35 point pace? Have the worst actual production for a 1st overall forward since 2005? I've acknowledged there were underlying reasons and he's not getting bounces, but, saying this was expected is going too far the other way to downplay this season's production.
How about we say we were both wrong and move on? The truth of what people said is somewhere in the middle. Deal?
 

Albatros

Registered User
Aug 19, 2017
12,581
8,004
Ostsee
If he gets really lucky he could reach 30 points this season, talking about 50 or 60 is delusional and has no connection to reality.
 

TimeZone

Make the pick
Sep 15, 2008
19,895
8,426
Lost
Definitely the most underwhelmed I've been by watching a first overall pick in recent memory.

Dude gets pushed around more than any other player I've ever seen and has an absolute muffin of a shot.

The potential is definitely there but he's got a long way to go. Gonna need a big offseason in the gym.
 

Scooooooooooooot

Registered User
Jul 31, 2018
2,333
1,628
Definitely the most underwhelmed I've been by watching a first overall pick in recent memory.

Dude gets pushed around more than any other player I've ever seen and has an absolute muffin of a shot.

The potential is definitely there but he's got a long way to go. Gonna need a big offseason in the gym.

Clearly you dont watch much, shot really isnt bad, actually been impressed at its speed compared to what i expected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deflowd

Jerzey Devil

Jerzey-Duz-It
Jun 11, 2010
5,893
4,750
St. Augustine, FL
I hope Jack is disappointed with his numbers this year and uses it to become a better player next year. I’d be lying if I said I didn’t expect a little more from him this year. He’s got a lot of talent and I’m not too worried about it but he’s got some work to do.
 

NYSPORTS

back afta dis. . .
Jun 17, 2019
7,993
4,459
Clearly you dont watch much, shot really isnt bad, actually been impressed at its speed compared to what i expected.

he himself said he had to work on his shot whereas the Gretzky, Crosby’s type had a laser shot before Day 1. That was concerning (for me) prior to the draft.

His skating, COD, vision and passing is as good as it gets. Phenomenal actually
 

Scooooooooooooot

Registered User
Jul 31, 2018
2,333
1,628
he himself said he had to work on his shot whereas the Gretzky, Crosby’s type had a laser shot before Day 1. That was concerning (for me) prior to the draft.

His skating, COD, vision and passing is as good as it gets. Phenomenal actually

Im not saying he has a laser but i expected a true muffin and even guys on the Devils said his shot was surprisingly better than they expected. Feel like his shot is decent and theres obviously room for it to improve.
 

Favin

Registered User
Jun 24, 2015
2,465
2,033
Toronto
Being told to expect a Patrick Kane like player, who was a 70 point player in year one.

Patrick Kane was older at the start of the season than Jack Hughes will be at the end of the season. He also had an extra year in junior to transition to NHL.

Hughes is the youngest player in NHL. He is also the lightest. He plays on a crap team, has seen his coach fired, his GM fired, his mentor traded, and his billet dad/goalie demoted to AHL.

He will be fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vtdevils2k

KirkAlbuquerque

#WeNeverGetAGoodCoach
Mar 12, 2014
33,134
38,416
New York
Definitely the most underwhelmed I've been by watching a first overall pick in recent memory.

Dude gets pushed around more than any other player I've ever seen and has an absolute muffin of a shot.

The potential is definitely there but he's got a long way to go. Gonna need a big offseason in the gym.

he needs to study Johnny Gaudreau. Of course Gaudreau didn't join the league until he was already 21. Probably makes a difference
 

TimeZone

Make the pick
Sep 15, 2008
19,895
8,426
Lost
Clearly you dont watch much, shot really isnt bad, actually been impressed at its speed compared to what i expected.

I watch A LOT of Devils games as my best friend is a Devils fan.

His shot is very, very weak and needs to be worked on, as he's admitted himself.
 

Scooooooooooooot

Registered User
Jul 31, 2018
2,333
1,628
I watch A LOT of Devils games as my best friend is a Devils fan.

His shot is very, very weak and needs to be worked on, as he's admitted himself.

I can also put things in ALL CAPS, doesn't validate your opinion. Obviously needs to be worked on but you are exaggerating for effect clearly.
 

Bankers Box

Registered User
Aug 26, 2009
594
685
I haven’t been too impressed by his shot, not a muffin but it’s below average.

If he had a better shot people wouldn’t be ragging on his point total bc when he able to play his game he produces a lot of scoring opportunities, just can’t finish for the life of him.

Nico and Jack both are rage inducing when you see the skill and the scoring chances they produce only to shoot it directly into the goalie’s chest.
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
33,991
21,082
Toronto
Patrick Kane was older at the start of the season than Jack Hughes will be at the end of the season. He also had an extra year in junior to transition to NHL.

Hughes is the youngest player in NHL. He is also the lightest. He plays on a crap team, has seen his coach fired, his GM fired, his mentor traded, and his billet dad/goalie demoted to AHL.

He will be fine.
Kane was also smaller than Hughes. And, the age difference among top picks of the draft tends to be quite small. The only player younger was Sam Gagner in Kane's rookie year. Hughes also isn't the lightest player in the league. Atleast if you believe weight listings. Yamamoto, Farabee, Byron, Gusev, and Gaudreau are all listed as lighter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grentthealien

KirkAlbuquerque

#WeNeverGetAGoodCoach
Mar 12, 2014
33,134
38,416
New York
Kane was also smaller than Hughes. And, the age difference among top picks of the draft tends to be quite small. The only player younger was Sam Gagner in Kane's rookie year. Hughes also isn't the lightest player in the league. Atleast if you believe weight listings. Yamamoto, Farabee, Byron, Gusev, and Gaudreau are all listed as lighter.

height and weight listings are fake news
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad