ulvvf
Registered User
- May 9, 2014
- 2,744
- 150
Birth year is objectively the correct way to compare prospects.
Two kids are born - one on September 14 and one on September 15 of 1999. Since they were both born in the same year, they go to school in the same grade and they play on a hockey team with other kids born in the same year, and will graduate high school in the same year.
The kid born on September 14 will be drafted in 2017
The kid born on September 15 will be drafted in 2018
The argument you seem to be making is that the kid born on September 15, 1999 should be compared to 2000-born players, since he's drafted in 2018 because of an arbitrary cut-off, while the kid born on September 14, 1999 should be compared to 1999-born players, since he's drafted in 2017.
Compare players by their birth year and you compare them with their peers. Compare players by draft year and you risk comparing apples to oranges - or more accurately, a redder and riper apple to a sour and undeveloped apple.
Good players tend to player with older players, Pettersson has played this season against 30+ players, so no it is not at all like all 98 born always plays with other 98 born players and 99s players only with other 99 born players. It do not matter if they are born 14 sep, 15 sep, 31dec, 1jan, they play the level their current skills allow them to play at. So what team they will play for will most likely be deterimed by how good they are not what day they are born at.
Remember the season do not start at 1 jan. It may not start or end at 15 sep either, but is alot closer than 1 jan is, that is in the middle of the season, and while any date is a arbitrary cut-off no matter where you draw it (now they have made it the 14 sep, it would have been arbitrary cut-off, if they would have draw it at 31 dec also), but I would argue that the real hockey year and therefore the real development year starts when the season or pre season starts, not a random day in the middle of the season.