Every time I saw him (all games vs the Sharks) the kid looked like an AHL-er.
Impossible, he wasn't one of the guys wearing teal and black.
Every time I saw him (all games vs the Sharks) the kid looked like an AHL-er.
I would take Horvat over Stone, Hoffman and Lee. Ekblad, Gaudreau and Forsberg are clearly a class above.
If I judge based on projection and talent, I think Bo is top five in this year's rookie Corps.
Forsberg
Ekblad
Klingberg
Gaudreau
Horvat
Stone
Drouin
Hoffman
Rakell
Lee
In that Order. I may even put Horvat over Gaudreau because Horvat is more multi-dimensional in Bergeron's mold. (I'm so onboard his hype-train, I even changed my profile pic) I think there is only the top three that is in a class of its own.
Every time I saw him (all games vs the Sharks) the kid looked like an AHL-er.
Horvat is a quality young player, but he's not close to JG in the Calder race. JG has around 30 more points, along with being a plus player.
Horvat has succeeded in a role that Rookies almost always fail at.
Thats whats exciting about him as a canucks fan. As of now you can't compare him to the rookies like Forsberg, and Gaudreau as they have outproduced him massively offensively and are both worthy of being finalists for the calder. But they were both handed a top 6 spot and plenty of PP time as well. Im sure if you played Horvat with the Sedin's at ES and on the PP his point total would look quite different.
A quick look at my thread history will show that I wanted to trade up for Horvat before the draft... I was hoping 22 + 28 would potentially get us in the range... (Obviously, that wouldn't have worked with him going 9th).
I see a Jarret Stole like player with slightly better speed.. (Prime Stoll, not declining Stoll.) Great at faceoffs, great defensive game, good offensive instincts. You have a keeper, nuck fans!
I'd be happy with that. Career year around 60-65 points, while every other year he is consistently getting 40-50 points.
Horvat has succeeded in a role that Rookies almost always fail at.
Thats whats exciting about him as a canucks fan. As of now you can't compare him to the rookies like Forsberg, and Gaudreau as they have outproduced him massively offensively and are both worthy of being finalists for the calder. But they were both handed a top 6 spot and plenty of PP time as well. Im sure if you played Horvat with the Sedin's at ES and on the PP his point total would look quite different.
Klingberg... seriously?
They are in the top 6 because they are scoring like top 6 forwards (or rather top line forwards). Let's not get carried away with the Horvat hype, as I doubt he'd be producing like a first line player right now if given all those minutes.
Horvat has succeeded in a role that Rookies almost always fail at.
Thats whats exciting about him as a canucks fan. As of now you can't compare him to the rookies like Forsberg, and Gaudreau as they have outproduced him massively offensively and are both worthy of being finalists for the calder. But they were both handed a top 6 spot and plenty of PP time as well. Im sure if you played Horvat with the Sedin's at ES and on the PP his point total would look quite different.
Gaudreau and Horvat have the exact same even strength goals.
I'd say Horvat in my eyes has been just as impressive as Gaudreau
Gaudreau has the exact same number of even strength goals as Marian Hossa and Henrik Sedin
Gaudreau and Horvat have the exact same even strength goals.
I'd say Horvat in my eyes has been just as impressive as Gaudreau
Which means that even strength goals isn't a good way to decide who has been more impressive.He has 34 ESP
1 more point than Hossa and 5 less than Hank
Plus Hank has only scored 20 goals twice in his career of 14 seasons.
Gaudreau has the exact same number of even strength goals as Marian Hossa and Henrik Sedin
Which means that even strength goals isn't a good way to decide who has been more impressive.
Gaudreau and Horvat have the exact same even strength goals.
I'd say Horvat in my eyes has been just as impressive as Gaudreau