Why didn’t he, or couldn’t he, apply his god given skills to produce more in Liiga?
Once again you never answer this: your effusive praise of the player in all facets and aspects belies the empirical evidence we have before us. There were thirty some odd games where he did not produce a single point. Why is that?
Either he isn’t as complete (mentally, physically, etc) as you and others keep insisting he is or it is truly irrelevant that a 1OA, who will be an NHLer in a few months, couldn’t produce against Liiga opposition.
I’m willing to be more open minded about Slaf if someone can convince that his very low Liiga production is truly irrelevant.
It’s not that Slaf sucks, it’s more simple: if he’s so complete and perfect why weren’t his stats better? How can he have high IQ, superior stick, perfect physique, terrific skating, and lots of nifty tools (I am paraphrasing that scout from the devil’s blog video) and not produce more than c. 0.35 PPG?
I second these questions. If Slav is such a great player -- a legitimate 1st overall draft pick -- then why is it that he could not produce in LIIGA, which may be the 5th best league in the world at best behind the NHL, KHL, AHL, and SEL?
Comparison of D-1 years in Finland
Kotkaniemi, 29 points in 57 games
Sebastien Aho, 13 points in 30 games
Aleksander Barkov, 48 points in 53 games
Arturri Lehkonen, 30 points in 45 games
Rantanen 28 points in 56 games
Patrick Laine 33 points in 46 games
Teuvo Terevainen 18 points in 40 games
If Slafkovsky was on par with those players, he'd probably be the 4th or 5th best player in the draft, but his 10 points in 31 games is the worst performance of the above -- by a comfortable margin.