PiggySmalls
Oink Oink MF
- Mar 7, 2015
- 6,107
- 3,516
As much as Babcock loves him some Edmundson, Lou would not even let Armstrong finish a statement. Doesn't matter how many cookies DA is willing to give up.
What options are there though?
Sure, if Tavares is unsigned at the end of the season then Armstrong should be aggressive in trying to get him before UFA. Pick and prospect is better than losing him for nothing, signing an 8 year deal and traded is better than 7 year deal in UFA for Tavares and we can afford to move a decent prospect & pick. That's all rather hopeful.
Or going after someone like Reinhart and hoping for the best? Or just wait for Thomas?
I mostly brought it up as a conversation piece. IDK if they are credible though.Anyone else think that Marner rumor is totally bogus? Is that even a legit source? Sounds like some Eklund cow dung...
I wonder if they would actually be open to moving him. When I look at what Drouin returned, I suspect that Buffalo's ask would be significant based on his decent production in the past couple of seasons and draft pedigree.I think Reinhart would actually be a good target with BUFF being an absolute mess. Worst case scenario he can play RW a position in which we have a need. Problem will be his next contract and what that entails.
Ahhh gotcha. Well as long as folks aren't taking it too seriously, don't let me rain on the parade.I mostly brought it up as a conversation piece. IDK if they are credible though.
51% face off this year....on like 50 face off chances lol. I think he should be a RW but he could fill in C better than Steen (not saying much i know) .he is only 20 so he could still have C ability, but i would 100% be okay going after him as a RW onlyAhhh gotcha. Well as long as folks aren't taking it too seriously, don't let me rain on the parade.
I thought Marner was pretty much a pure RW but you mentioned he can play C...do you that like how Schwartz technically CAN play C, but should 100% be on the wing?
What options are there though?
Sure, if Tavares is unsigned at the end of the season then Armstrong should be aggressive in trying to get him before UFA. Pick and prospect is better than losing him for nothing, signing an 8 year deal and traded is better than 7 year deal in UFA for Tavares and we can afford to move a decent prospect & pick. That's all rather hopeful.
Or going after someone like Reinhart and hoping for the best? Or just wait for Thomas?
The only appealing player from the Sabres is ROR for me (Eichel is obviously off limits). He would be a good Stastny replacement if we're not looking to re-sign him. Okposo has health issues and is overpaid while on the decline of his career. Kane is a head case and while he can score goals, he doesn't provide any other benefit to the team. Reinhart is just a meh player.
Okposo had some major health issue, and i don't think it was concusion related. Im not even remotely interested in him. That's another candidate for an anchor contract.I know I'm in the minority, but if Buffalo retained salary, I'd absolutely be interested in Okposo. 2RW solved for the next 4 years. The injury was a concussion that he's come back from. The Sabres are a tire fire. If you can buy low on this guy, I think he's easily a bounce back 50-55 point player. At $5M/year? Absolutely.
Okposo had some major health issue, and i don't think it was concusion related. Im not even remotely interested in him. That's another candidate for an anchor contract.
Blues should look to just add a cheap whateer guy like Vrbata. For the lack of RW available...id rather just wait on the prospects as most of them should be ready for looks next year. If the Blues could add a guy like Marner(just for example) without pulling from the main roster core, then go for it. Other wise its a case of robbing peter to pay paul. I am not at all comfortable with removing Eddy or Dunn to add to the forward group.
Kapanen is a player that I like, but I don't think he is a very good target at this point.I know we have been over this multiple times, but Kapanen out of Toronto seems more do-able than Marner. Fast, RHS RW. I've been iffy about him in the past, as he can't seem to crack the Leads lineup, and he also seems to limit his play to the perimeter. He would be a lot cheaper than Marner. Perhaps a deal around Schmaltz when we are healthy?
'
I think everyone shares that sentiment....but he kinda fills a hole and should be dirt cheap.Am I the only one who doesn’t think much of Vrbata?
I guess I just feel like he would be another Miller. He is a player that is a theoretically better player than is on our roster, but once he gets on the team he actually doesn’t help.I think everyone shares that sentiment....but he kinda fills a hole and should be dirt cheap.
I dont disagree, but he's a right hand shot that's good at sitting in the soft area's and rifling 1 timers. I think he could be good on Stastny's wing. If he's not, no big deal as the cost shouldn't be high to get him. I just dont want to see DA try for a grand slam(Miller) and fail again. Vrbata would be a bunt....doesn't look impressive but could eventually result in a RBI(i hate baseball btw...just seemed like a good analogyI guess I just feel like he would be another Miller. He is a player that is a theoretically better player than is on our roster, but once he gets on the team he actually doesn’t help.
I guess I just feel like he would be another Miller. He is a player that is a theoretically better player than is on our roster, but once he gets on the team he actually doesn’t help.
If we're going to trade for Vrbata, why not just give one of the kids a chance in that role?
I don't see what difference a slow, aging, rather ineffective player will do for us.
That's 34 points over 82 games. What use is it to waste assets on a third line scoring winger who isn't anything special defensively and will literally be here for what's left of this season?Maybe because Vrbata is currently better than those guys? Vrbata had 55 pts last season. And 11 in 26 games so far this season. That’s not great but better than I think could reasonably be expected from Jaskin, Paajarvi, TT, Blais, Kostin etc.
I see where you’re going but Vrbata, or a similar caliber of player, won’t cost near as much as Miller did so I don’t think it’s a great anology.
Sure, a “hockey trade” where the Blues get a RW that fits the team that will be here a few years would be ideal but that guy might not be available...or might cost way more than we can afford if he is available.
Someone like Vrbata isn’t as exciting of a splash but that type of move seems more reasonable to actually pull off.
i was only referencing Miller when it came to his performance before and during his time on our team.I see where you’re going but Vrbata, or a similar caliber of player, won’t cost near as much as Miller did so I don’t think it’s a great anology.
Sure, a “hockey trade” where the Blues get a RW that fits the team that will be here a few years would be ideal but that guy might not be available...or might cost way more than we can afford if he is available.
Someone like Vrbata isn’t as exciting of a splash but that type of move seems more reasonable to actually pull off.