JaegerDice
The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
- Dec 26, 2014
- 25,342
- 9,698
Seattle is in the Pacific Northwest
He has a no move, gets to pick from the 3 teams he wants to go to. We arent getting much.He’s my favorite Hawks but at this point it might not be the worst thing if he brings back decent value (which he has). I’ll be pissed as hell if it’s just a 3rd or something.
I could probably live with that. It would create room for Hamilton and the kids.We could trade them Keith with retention to mentor their young team, and all we ask in return is for them to draft CdH! Voila....more money....to sign Hamilton or something.
So, no rush on trading him I guess? I’m all for trying if he wants out, but it has to make sense for the team as well.He has a no move, gets to pick from the 3 teams he wants to go to. We arent getting much.
He’s my favorite Hawks but at this point it might not be the worst thing if he brings back decent value (which he has). I’ll be pissed as hell if it’s just a 3rd or something.
He has little value even if he didnt have a NMC. He probably wants out, he didnt look like he was enjoying hockey last year, which is why I started a thread about his future.So, no rush on trading him I guess? I’m all for trying if he wants out, but it has to make sense for the team as well.
Well, f***.I mean it’s probably going to be that and the Hawks are going to retain salary
I have a hard time wrapping my head about him having little value. He’s still a second pairing D, on a fair contract that expires in two years, and with a ton of experience and leadership. We would have killed for such an acquisition during the contending years.He has little value even if he didnt have a NMC. He probably wants out, he didnt look like he was enjoying hockey last year, which is why I started a thread about his future.
He wants to go makes it seem like he wants out. He's more than earned that right.
His advanced stats are shit because he's being overexposed on the Hawks.I have a hard time wrapping my head about him having little value. He’s still a second pairing D, on a fair contract that expires in two years, and with a ton of experience and leadership. We would have killed for such an acquisition during the contending years.
I have a hard time wrapping my head about him having little value. He’s still a second pairing D, on a fair contract that expires in two years, and with a ton of experience and leadership. We would have killed for such an acquisition during the contending years.
Just my opinion of course. I’m probably very bias.
Vancouver has zero cap space. Maybe we get value if we eat one of their bad contracts.Winnipeg maybe? Only team in western Canada or the PNW that isn’t bad that I can see him actually wanting to go to if it’s about winning. Otherwise it’s all about getting out of Chicago with all this shit going on.
Unless he maybe thinks Vancouver can be decent. I don’t but can see the argument at least.
I think it's going to be Eriksson or Neal+ for Keith.He was really, really bad last year after the first 5-10 games.
GMs are dumb though and love guys with hardware. I honestly have no idea what to expect.
As someone who watched him struggle last year like he did, I wouldn’t give up more than a second or third for him. On the other hand a bad GM might look at what he’s accomplished and still give up a first for him if we retain a little bit.
Vancouver has zero cap space. Maybe we get value if we eat one of their bad contracts.