Ace
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2015
- 23,562
- 28,482
If he wants to come home as a UFA next year that’s a different conversation…but they have zero reason to give up assets for him now.
Rumor: Blackhawks engaging with teams in trade talks for Patrick Kane, Stars among the interested
- Thread starter Marc the Habs Fan
- Start date
Lou’s sucksCompher is one of you. Rejecting Compher is like rejecting your neighbor. He probably has Lou Malnati's flown in once a week.
John Mandalorian
2022 Avs: The First Dance
- Nov 29, 2018
- 10,963
- 6,770
GhostfaceWu
Shi Shaw
- Feb 11, 2015
- 10,038
- 10,295
In what world does that get out a 90 plus point player? Nobody wants your overpaid junk for their star player.
Unspecified
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Apr 29, 2015
- 6,115
- 2,987
Not saying there wouldn't be picks involved but don't count on getting 2023's 1st from Dallas.
TheGoldenJet
Registered User
Cubs2024WSChamps
Tate MacRae follows me on Tiktok
- Apr 29, 2015
- 7,907
- 2,464
I seem to recall DeBrincat returning the second overall, Holtz, Mercer, and next years first.
Kane should easily fetch a teams top five prospects and minimum five first round picks.
E3
Kane should easily fetch a teams top five prospects and minimum five first round picks.
E3
Kaners PPGs
Registered User
I understand they were dumps but they would have taken a better deal if there was a market for them. When was the last true blue-chip prospect moved? Suzuki? Brannstrom? It just doesn't happen. I will be very surprised if the principal piece returned for Kane is much more than a 1st and from a playoff team you are talking #20 or higher. So I'll stick with my 1st and a B-level prospect for Kane at the deadline. Maybe a midround pick gets added. If significant salary comes back it will increase the haul but you are talking about number of pieces not level of prospect.
Toews for a 1st round pick only happens if his game improves greatly from last year. His game last year was at the level of a #3C.
Kaners PPGs
Registered User
lol- I'm not questioning that. We keep seeing over and over about players and what people think they'll return and the actual return ALWAYS underwhelms. If Debrincat with 2 years of control brings pack pick #7, what do you think Kane for half a season brings back? A playoff-team level first and a B-level prospect. Maybe another small piece but they're not getting a blue chip prospect or multiple 1st round picks. Let's not forget that Kane has a NMC so the number of teams bidding on him will be small. We see how soft the market is for wingers. What do you think Kane returns?
Last edited:
dj Mahoney
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2021
- 1,185
- 522
For a top 10 scorer , 3 time cup winner . You are wrong , just so wrong ,Kane will command a lot.
Newhook and a 1st for one year of Kane? Seems really steep
Kaners PPGs
Registered User
We'll see. He's a pure rental playing the least valuable position with a limited number of teams that he would accept a trade to. This isn't a question of what should he return.
Hawks would accept that in a second. Doubt Colorado pays that price.
What do you think he'll return? Now find a team that meets Kane's criteria, has that package, and is willing to pay it.
Kaners PPGs
Registered User
Dr Pepper
Registered User
StateOfHockey101
Registered User
- May 19, 2015
- 272
- 31
I wish the wild could get him to take Fiala spot. They have enough cap room if he's 50% retained.
TheNumber4
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2011
- 37,071
- 42,486
Of course there’s no active talks about Kane. Kane and McD have already decided he’s joining the Oilers. Kane will let the Blackhawks know when it’s time to fire up the trade talks. Oilers need to get some ducks in a row first with Yamo still needing to be signed and a trade or two to make.
Bunch of Jurcos
The poster formally known as Hedley
- Feb 24, 2016
- 3,661
- 15,457
I wish we could get him in Carolina. It would really make us a dangerous team in the playoffs in a way we haven't been.
Actually your comparisons now including cat don't match statistics. Sure kane has a say in which teams albeit Davidson also has a say . In the end he doesn't have to trade kane . The return in which I'm not into speculations however we don't know exactly what chicago wants more i.e forward, center, goalie, defenseman blue chip prospects. Also would a deal with said team include signing kane for a extension? No matter what happens the return will include at minimum a 2023 1st round pick plus a high level prospect or blue chip player .
Kanes production and his 3 stanley cups makes him well worth giving up to get him...
Dallas would most likely need to get a 3rd team involved and move out salary to acquire kane. Plus when kane hits free agency the market has been set by malkin 6.1 million 4 years , which if your trying to compare what kane can easily get as a free agent...
Kcb12345
Registered User
- Jun 6, 2017
- 29,487
- 22,849
Why wouldn't Chicago be willing to take on a little salary? Can't see why they wouldn't and maximize their return
Shouldn't have this trade been completed before free agency started? Seems that the idiot Blackhawks have limited their suitors.
Kcb12345
Registered User
- Jun 6, 2017
- 29,487
- 22,849
And why is Dallas giving away a 23 year old starting goalie for a rental?
It's not that chicago can't or wouldn't do it, dallas as of right now has around 10 million in cap space with trying to finish rounding out its roster , even if Chicago retained 50% max dallas would need to shed enough salary and still field a legit cup contender.
So a 3rd team might be more beneficial eating cap space as well.
