Whawks33
Registered User
AG9NK35DT8 said:Since when is Regehr still a prospect ?
Since its probably Richie not Robyn
AG9NK35DT8 said:Since when is Regehr still a prospect ?
Evilo said:I'm not sure about that.
Orpik is a hitting machine, Whitney has been great in his first pro season, Welch is the best defenseman in college, Goligoski might be second, and Lannon one of the steadiest, Bolf and Bissonnette are both impressive in the OHL, Sersenand Letang in the Q, Fernholm, Lupaschuk and Nemec overseas...
Seems like a very complete, deep, and productive group to me...
Nashville's pretty good, I'm not saying the contrary, but the Pens' group is IMO deeper and with just as good at the top.
moosefan said:I really love the Blackhawks young defense:
Cam Barker
Anton Babchuck
Brent Seabrooke
Michael Barinka
James Wisniewski
Duncan Keith
Thanks for showing me the light.Sykie said:Man, I've always been amazed by your bias with Penguins, but this list may be one of the worst I've ever seen on these boards.
Either you're joking, or you're the worst homer ever. Ever.
Evilo said:Thanks for showing me the light.
I'll work on it.
Promised.
Evilo said:Thanks for showing me the light.
I'll work on it.
Promised.
Sykie said:Okay I was harsh... but come on... please take a serious look again at your list :
1- Suter
2- Whitney
3- Welch
4- Weber
5- Goligoski
6- Fernholm
7- Klein
8- Nemec
9- Parent
10- Bissonnette
Weber at 4th ? Shea Weber is on par with Ryan Whitney. You can make a case either way, I personally would take Weber with no hesitation, and I can live if you prefer Whitney... but there is no way Weber is 4th.
Ryan Parent, Kevin Klein and Noah Welch are more or less of equal value. They should serve as solid top-4 D, and all three have a promissing NHL career ahead. Welch is 3rd, Parent is 9th ? This can't be serious.
You didn't even care to mention Teemu Laakso. This is absolutly brutal when you name Bissonnette or Nemec in the top-ten. Laakso is arguably on par with Fernholm, who is 6th on your list. Actually both have comparable profiles since both had injury troubles and felt in the draft, but both have talent to be a top-4 D one day and I see no serious reason to put Fernholm at 6th while Laakso isn't even here.
And if Bissonnette and Nemec are in the list, you can make a case Kulyash or Sulzer should be here too. Yet you even achieve to put Nemec above Parent...
In short, I hate being so harsh, but your list is just horrible. You seriously have a huge, huge homerism problem...
Evilo said:But he was a freshman.