NOTENOUGHRYJOTHINGS
Registered User
- Oct 23, 2022
- 1,619
- 3,273
Below KA Miller level. Even further below Brewer level.So Brewer level?
Below KA Miller level. Even further below Brewer level.So Brewer level?
Bo Byram bump, because my fangirl-ing knows no bounds.
View attachment 737813
View attachment 737814
I saw #25 and thought we were getting better...nope we were #23 last year
It is simply a u23 ranking instead of a pure prospect. IMO it actually makes more sense than random prospect definitions. A 20 year old who has a season or two in the league and might actually be a legit good NHLer means more to an org that a 3rd round pick still in college at 21-22.I don’t understand how their criteria can allow a guy who’s already on his second NHL contract to be included in the pipeline rankings, but oh well.
Different ranking. That one excluded young NHLers.Were they not dead last, last year? Or was that another ranking?
Too bad we only see him 25% of a season.Watching King Bo is just pure delight for me !
Too bad we only see him 25% of a season.
Yah. Might see him 26% next season. Cant wait. Cant wait.That'll improve mate
Jack Hughes is probably still a prospect to this writer. Maybe one day Jack will be an NHL regular?I don’t understand how their criteria can allow a guy whose already on his second NHL contract to be included in the pipeline rankings, but oh well.
K'Andre Miller is having a rather mediocre season so far. Of Byram, Miller and Bouchard (3 guys on the same contract), Miller is the one with the worst analytics behind his so-so play.Below KA Miller level. Even further below Brewer level.
AgreedThank god they extended Toews to a massive contract instead of trading him for a real 2C.
Agreed
If that’s the case, it’s because the Avs didn’t move Bo for a quality 2C.Byram is having a rough go this last month for sure, he'll need to pull himself out of this. I have no doubt that he will.
I still think trading Toews was the smarter decision. But I'll save that rant for June when the Avs get bounced in round 1 or 2 because they still don't have a second line center.
If that’s the case, it’s because the Avs didn’t move Bo for a quality 2C.
We all know that Bo is much more likely to pull in a quality 2C, than a pending UFA looking for a big extension.
It’s an interesting perspective.I've been very clear for a long while now that I don't believe either of Byram [injury concerns] or Girard [not good enough] would return the 2C the Avs need. Only Toews was going to do that.
But shoulda, woulda, coulda at this point. The Avs made their bed and if you're aware of history in the slightest you can see where this ship is going.
Can you imagine for just a minute that Sakic pulled a top pair defenseman for two 2nds, won a cup with him, them flipped him right before he turned 30 for a longer term 2C while letting the kid you drafted 4th OA take his spot next to the best defenseman in the NHL? 4D chess move of the century. Instead we'll get to watch Toews age off into the sunset with the Avs cup contention window.
It’s an interesting perspective.
I believe that Bo has significantly more value in acquiring a 2C than Toews did. Or at least, the type of 2C we could get.
Toews was a 30 year old, pending UFA about to sign a big extension.
Bo is still young, has draft pedigree, has cost control.
There’s a far better chance Bo is able to bring in a younger, higher potential 2C than Toews, imo of course