He also talked up vats before the expansion draft. Regardless it's all pretty similar to his comments when Nonis was in TO and it was a given then that he was a Nonis Shill. Like, half the comments in a trade thread that referenced Dreger were just "yeah but he's just upping the value for Nonis" or "just Nonis trying to feel out the market through the media". Now it's ducks players and the over the top trade requirements are just illustrating a totally different and reasonable point outside of trade value. Nonis being in Anaheim is a totally unrelated and completely coincidental fact. Shocking...
Again, I'm not denying that teams try to use the media to their advantage at times. But this particular supposed example makes no sense.
At the end of the season Murray spoke at length about Montour being a huge part of team's future, and talked about him taking on a larger role moving forward. Dreger and Lebrun both stated that the Ducks have no desire to move Montour, and wouldn't even listen barring an tremendous offer such as Nylander.
What sounds more reasonable, that the Ducks have no interest in moving this player and that Dreger was merely applying common sense to the situation, or that it's all a big conspiracy theory to raise Montour's trade value around the league?
Keep in mind Nonis is not the GM, Murray is - and much like the new regime in Toronto he has always run a very tight lipped ship.
The notion that the Ducks are using the media to try and pimp Montour's trade value is completely ridiculous. That's reading way too much into a talking head simply making a very reasonable statement about the availability of one of Anaheim's key young players.