Felonious Python
Minor League Degenerate
- Aug 20, 2004
- 30,825
- 8,928
Alpharetta isn't downtown Atlanta...
STH's aren't the issue. It's about infrastructure, and to an extent, a place free agents want to go.You’re right, it’s not. But if I remember right with the Thrashers fan base, a large chunk of them (and STH’s) were in north Fulton County. My previous employer - our Southeast headquarters was in Alpharetta. MARTA access and a good chunk of money is in and around that area (Norcross, etc)
They got a long way to go though. I say it’s a longshot, but at least they’ll have one thing going for them this go-around. An ownership that actually wants them.
Seems odd then why people end up in Alpharetta, Norcross, and Duluth when they move to the Metro Atlanta area and yet identify themselves as AtlantansPeople move to Atlanta area, and orient themselves to how close they want to be to Atlanta. They don't orient themselves to Alpharetta.
The Hawks have existed for years. Maybe squabble about revenue and dates, but downtown seems to work fine for them.
Ownership isn't the question. There can be otherwise good ownerships that botched the arena location, and bad ownership isn't going to be better in the suburbs.Seems odd then why people end up in Alpharetta, Norcross, and Duluth when they move to the Metro Atlanta area and yet identify themselves as Atlantans
Yeah, the Hawks have existed for years. But it was clear from day one when A$G took over the Thrashers from Turner, there was already an exit plan to divest themselves of the club. Downtown would’ve worked just fine. It did work fine, for a small bit of time. Had they had a committed ownership group to not only hold on to them, but actually invest in the product, it would’ve be a far different outcome.
But they didn’t and that’s why they are now in YWG. The idiots that made up the first run of Atlanta Spirit Group are a classic, textbook example of an ownership group that couldn’t get out of each others way and a perfect storm of dysfunction. And when you have that environment, that also had zero interest in investing in the product, well there you have it.
I’m curious to see what lack of infrastructure there would be in that area?
Both cities also apparently have arena issues, so this would all be years down the line.The NHL is considering ANOTHER 2 expansion teams....Houston and Atlanta (again). Blehhgh
Yea, I've read several people, and heard people the radio and a podcast all say they would like to see 4 come in at once.Both cities also apparently have arena issues, so this would all be years down the line.
The Coyotes need to figure out what they're doing, as well. If Tempe says no to an arena, then they may not have much of an option but to relocate.
If they do expand, then I'd have to figure that they'd come in one at a time. Two teams at once would stretch the expansion draft, probably too far.
It wouldn't be good for the expansion teams, either. The 2000 expansion draft had two teams. Minnesota and Columbus. Instead of building one bad team, they had to split the player pool between themselves.Yea, I've read several people, and heard people the radio and a podcast all say they would like to see 4 come in at once.
Yea, 4 players off each team....riiiight. Even one is bad, two would be terrible, anymore would be catastrophic, especially to a team like us with a small prospect pool and no draft capital.
True. But a city council that is "Nope. We're good. We're in the black. No need to go in reverse". Lamar Hunt Jr sounded like he was interested years ago till he was told $500M was the price tag.It wouldn't be good for the expansion teams, either. The 2000 expansion draft had two teams. Minnesota and Columbus. Instead of building one bad team, they had to split the player pool between themselves.
Kansas City already has an arena.
AZ could theoretically move to Kansas City, possibly keeping the same owners.True. But a city council that is "Nope. We're good. We're in the black. No need to go in reverse". Lamar Hunt Jr sounded like he was interested years ago till he was told $500M was the price tag.
"Nope".
Kansas City Council is good with their lease agreement with AEG Worldwide. It would take alot of deep pockets to get that one done.
Coincidentally, Quebec City also has an arena. But it'll take a whole fleet of deep pockets for that one. So the League will continue to dangle "ready-to-receive" cities like KC and QC over the heads of many. City government or otherwise.
The problem is especially concerning for teams that have depended on RSNs’ media rights fees to help fund everything from player salaries to marketing efforts. Local media rights can make up to 50% of an MLB team’s total revenue, sources said. Times will be tough if that dries up.
Yeah this. Also, I don’t see a lot of young Russian talent coming to NA and the NHL anytime soon.Yeah at some point you have to start thinking about how large hockey's talent pool is. Adding multiple teams at once when we're at 32 already weakens the product team quite a bit. But I mean, we'd get to see McDavid hit 180 points or whatever.
Theoretically if I walked into the League offices in NY with (liquidity) $1.5B and announced I'd like a franchise in Orlando, would they tell me no?AZ could theoretically move to Kansas City, possibly keeping the same owners.
I wonder about the timing a little bit. RSNs collapse and then Atlanta and Houston rumors surface.
As revenue for RSNs plummets, sports execs search for new local rights models with focus on streaming
Sports business executives are so concerned about the cratering RSN business that executives from leagues, teams, distributors and the networks have met regularly over the past several weeks to look into new business models for local media rights, according to several sources.www.sportsbusinessjournal.com
The AHL would also expand if the NHL approved another team.