Blue Jays Discussion: And the off-season begins (list of FA's in Post #1)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
10,834
6,007
He might be worth about that as a starter, but he was worth that as a rookie MLB reliever. I think he can continue to improve upon that as a reliever. We need relievers now, I don't see the logic behind keeping him as a depth option for 2017 with the hopes he can get slightly more than 1.2 fWAR in 2018 when we only have 3 starters lined up as of now.

He was a really solid reliever, you need those on a team, I don't see the reason to forgo that next year in hopes that he can be a meh starter.

I think the assumption that his ceiling is "slightly more than 1.2 fWAR" or "a meh starter" is a big part of the differing opinions here.
 

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
88,343
31,715
Langley, BC
interesting that they chose to give Bautista the QO. I mean, if he can get back to normal, 17m is an alright number. If he repeats last year, then it's no bueno and a big waste of cash.

Bautista won't accept the QO likely just out of ego/principle. He's bound and determined to go to the market and get what he expects is his big payday in spite of the craptacular year he just had. And even in spite of said craptacular year, some dumb GM is likely to throw at least $20m per at him banking on the idea that this was just an aberrant swoon season and ignore that injuries and age have him just about ready to fall off the cliff as a fielder.
 

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
10,834
6,007
interesting that they chose to give Bautista the QO. I mean, if he can get back to normal, 17m is an alright number. If he repeats last year, then it's no bueno and a big waste of cash.

Even with the down season, giving him the QO has always been a no-brainer.
 

Rysto

Registered User
Oct 3, 2009
2,818
292
The badlands
Bautista won't accept the QO likely just out of ego/principle. He's bound and determined to go to the market and get what he expects is his big payday in spite of the craptacular year he just had. And even in spite of said craptacular year, some dumb GM is likely to throw at least $20m per at him banking on the idea that this was just an aberrant swoon season and ignore that injuries and age have him just about ready to fall off the cliff as a fielder.

Honestly, a multiyear deal even at less than $17M per year would probably be a better deal for Bautista than 1 year. If he takes the 1 year, another down year or a major injury could cost him a ton of money.
 

JS19

Legends Never Die
Aug 14, 2009
11,350
310
The Shark Tank
interesting that they chose to give Bautista the QO. I mean, if he can get back to normal, 17m is an alright number. If he repeats last year, then it's no bueno and a big waste of cash.

The QO isn't necessarily for the figure, it's to make sure they get an asset in return.
 

LaCarriere

Registered User
Bautista won't accept the QO likely just out of ego/principle. He's bound and determined to go to the market and get what he expects is his big payday in spite of the craptacular year he just had. And even in spite of said craptacular year, some dumb GM is likely to throw at least $20m per at him banking on the idea that this was just an aberrant swoon season and ignore that injuries and age have him just about ready to fall off the cliff as a fielder.

It's not out of ego/principle. There's a reason the vast majority of players have declined QOs that have been offered them, and it's because if a team is willing to spend 17M (15M last year, 14M the year before), then that player is more than good enough to get a multi-year deal. Top players don't sign 1 year deals.

A very conservative open market deal would be 3/45 for Bautista, and at his age that's a much better deal than 1/17. Also, to think he won't bounce back after this year is a bit much. I guarantee you, even at his age, this was a down year for him.
 

TF97

Registered User
Jul 4, 2010
12,291
478
Halifax, NS
I wouldn't mind Atkins going after John Lamb (Reds). He just underwent another back surgery and is out of options, but a move to the pen could benefit him.
 

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
88,343
31,715
Langley, BC
It's not out of ego/principle. There's a reason the vast majority of players have declined QOs that have been offered them, and it's because if a team is willing to spend 17M (15M last year, 14M the year before), then that player is more than good enough to get a multi-year deal. Top players don't sign 1 year deals.

true. I'm just saying that at the very least he wouldn't accept the QO just out of ego. There's more at work, obviously, but even if there wasn't he likley wouldn't take the QO just out of his own sense of self-worth.

A very conservative open market deal would be 3/45 for Bautista, and at his age that's a much better deal than 1/17. Also, to think he won't bounce back after this year is a bit much. I guarantee you, even at his age, this was a down year for him.

I expect his bat will come back some. But he's quickly becoming unplayable in the field.
 

hockeywiz542

Registered User
May 26, 2008
15,921
4,992
Rogers Sportsnet’s Shi Davidi joined Bob McCown and Damien Cox to discuss his takeaways from Toronto Blue Jays GM Ross Atkins’ season-ending press conference. Davidi was interested by Atkins comments that the organization wants to win now, and that they’re making Jose and Edwin a priority. He discussed the progression of Blue Jays’ prospects, and what a new Rogers CEO means for the club.

http://pmd.fan590.com/audio_on_dema...n-and-Damien-Cox-BM,DC-20161024-Interview.mp3
 

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
88,343
31,715
Langley, BC
Rogers Sportsnet’s Shi Davidi joined Bob McCown and Damien Cox to discuss his takeaways from Toronto Blue Jays GM Ross Atkins’ season-ending press conference. Davidi was interested by Atkins comments that the organization wants to win now, and that they’re making Jose and Edwin a priority. He discussed the progression of Blue Jays’ prospects, and what a new Rogers CEO means for the club.

http://pmd.fan590.com/audio_on_dema...n-and-Damien-Cox-BM,DC-20161024-Interview.mp3

Oh dear god. All they need now is Steve Simmons to complete the unholy trinity.
 

613Leafer

Registered User
May 26, 2008
12,846
3,678
I'd want Bautista to agree to play 1b as part of the deal.

Why bother when we could probably more easily get EE signed to do that? He's younger, has less ego, sounds more interested in staying here, has a history of playing 1B, and was a much better hitter this past year.

Even if Bautista bounces back, he's not a noticeably better hitter than EE. Their 2015 seasons were pretty comparable to each other.
 

frost king

Registered User
Dec 11, 2013
458
1
Have been following this team from day one at Exhibition Staduim, why can't for once, a major Blue Jay Star, for once gracefully retire with the team? Why is it, that every major star we have had it Toronto, whether baseball or hockey, for whatever reason, through management or money demands have we chased them away? Every Blue Jay great never finished his career here. The Yankees and Red Sox seem to take care of their own, but here in Toronto we chew them up and spit them out. For once I would like to see it happen here.
 

theaub

34-38-61-10-13-15
Nov 21, 2008
18,885
1,977
Toronto
Bautista/Edwin splitting duties at 1B/DH is the dream but I think someone will make the mistake of giving Jose $$ to play OF.

Have been following this team from day one at Exhibition Staduim, why can't for once, a major Blue Jay Star, for once gracefully retire with the team? Why is it, that every major star we have had it Toronto, whether baseball or hockey, for whatever reason, through management or money demands have we chased them away? Every Blue Jay great never finished his career here. The Yankees and Red Sox seem to take care of their own, but here in Toronto we chew them up and spit them out. For once I would like to see it happen here.

Ortiz/Rivera never made more than $16M per season - Jeter topped out at $17M after his age 36 season.

If our FA's are willing to take those AAV's then sure.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
I'll say this - maybe i'm naive but it does sound as if negotiations with EE and Jose are genuine, and not for show.
 

TheTotalPackage

Registered User
Sep 14, 2006
7,409
5,604
Regarding Bautista and his pending free agency, is he looking to cash in on his last deal or will he ring chase? Would he rather take a 4 year/$90 million deal from the White Sox (hypothetical) or a 3 year/$60 million deal from the Red Sox?

I don't think I've read or heard much on this angle. Obviously he wants both. But the top teams are less likely going to give him what he wants than some weaker teams willing to overpay in free agency to make a splash.
 

SpezDispenser

Registered User
Aug 15, 2007
26,769
6,291
I maintain we need a culture change - and that can be done by moving on from Bautista. He gets on a lot - something I think the Jays lacked last year, but he's a distraction that isn't needed (IMO) for what he now brings and he tends to have selfish atbats. Focus on EE and depending on what the Reds will eat salary wise, look at Votto or another player who fits the mold of a table setter for EE and Donaldson and Tulo etc.

That's my opinion - and I don't know what I'm talking about really, so do the opposite.
 

sabresEH

Registered User
May 17, 2009
3,428
1,409
Kelowna, BC
I know he had a terrible second half but any chance we qualify saunders? My thinking is if he accepts you have your DH at 17mill(expensive but we're willing to give that to JB to DH) who can also fill in in the OF. If he rejects and gets a multi year deal from someone we get the pick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad