lmao, can he play any defense?Makar is a -10 already?
We live in a sound bite world. Get the narrative out there and it becomes reality.lmao, can he play any defense?
Meanwhile, Fox is basically flawless on defense and produces just as much as Makar and people think Makar is overwhelmingly better? Oh cause he's "flashy". Never change HF.
lmao, can he play any defense?
Meanwhile, Fox is basically flawless on defense and produces just as much as Makar and people think Makar is overwhelmingly better? Oh cause he's "flashy". Never change HF.
He can play defense but not nearly as well as Fox for example.Since when can Makar not play defence?
Granted he started slow and had a terrible game against Washington (-6), but it’s not his fault he has an on-ice save percentage of 82.
I love the certainty in which Rangers fans believe Fox is better than Makar. As if it’s not even a question that Fox is the superior player.
Come on man, like Avs fans don't do the same thing. That said, Fox is the superior player. He's much better in how own zone and puts up comparable numbers.
Probably a little too early to be comparing him to the second-best defenceman of all time (or third if you put Doug Harvey ahead).In 20 years, Adam Fox will be regarded the same way Nicklas Lidstrom is today.
Not that Makar and Heiskanen won't have great, potentially even Hall of Fame careers. Just Fox is a true generational talent.
9 games into the season :Imagine being so insecure that your Norris winning defenseman didn't get enough votes to satisfy your wants that you write paragraphs about how wrong people are when you could literally just post a photo of the Norris Trophy.
Work smarter, not harder, kids.
Put Miro with MacKinnon and Rantanen or with Panarin and Zibanejad and he would very likely produce the same points as Makar and Fox while still dominating defensively.