Prospect Info: #70 Danil Misyul D

Blackjack

Registered User
Feb 13, 2003
18,164
14,975
keyjhboardd +bro]ke
Visit site
It is called "KHL contract expiry date" aka the 1st of May. :)

Draft+4 years is pretty usual waiting time, not sure why it got you that desperate.

NJ has Hughes, Siegenthaler, Bahl, Vilen down the left side. I’m surprised we signed Misyul rather than trade him.

I liked him when we drafted him, I’m happy we signed him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

Captain3rdLine

Registered User
Sep 24, 2020
6,765
7,979
You can never have too many assets. Misyul is clearly a good player, so let's get him over here and see what we have. Worst case, he can be packaged in a trade to upgrade third line. Doesn't hurt to make Utica better either.
I mean I have no issue whatsoever but that’s probably more a long the lines of best case. Not sure he would be worth anyone trading for right now. Likely best case is he does well enough to have a shot at being an NHL player and/or be worth a team trading some depth for. Worst case he isn’t that good in the AHL and goes back to the KHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: forceten

forceten

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2004
4,914
5,348
Raleigh, NC
I feel like we were expecting him to play well in the AHL. And I'm glad to see he's exceeding those expectations with some offensive contributions on top of his solid defense.

Some good defenders in Utica - Nemec, Misyul, Vilen, Hatakka. And we have more to come in Europe and juniors/college. Insane.
 

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
7,076
18,516
St Petersburg
I feel like we were expecting him to play well in the AHL. And I'm glad to see he's exceeding those expectations with some offensive contributions on top of his solid defense.

Some good defenders in Utica - Nemec, Misyul, Vilen, Hatakka. And we have more to come in Europe and juniors/college. Insane.
Casey isn't bad in NCAA too.
I don't see any real problem with defense as a system, I think Devils have enough with Jack, Nico, Jesper, Timo, Dawson, Sasha Holtzev, and may be Lenny and Gritsyuk. The real issue is goalie now, and 3C candidate who can play center role in top 6 if we want. But with goalies you never know until they are playing in NHL on the starter level. So next draft Devils should draft 4 centers and 2 goalies.

From yesterday game Misyul feeling well in AHL, its not surprise, but its still a good thing. May be call up, may be part of the trade, he us 23yo only with respectable numbers in ahl now and big experience in KHL. I believe Devils can cement some holes in the roster for one two years with him as a trade part. Or may be they will finally give him some opportunity, he can play PK, he is mobile and physical and it looks like his game with the puck at least better than what it was year or two ago. Miller could be a good partner at least for try.
Tactics to draft mobile big defensive defensemen us good. When they are having some puck skills(it was a main issue with Daniil), it works well.

BTW Okhotyuk is playing 19-20 min per game in sj. His numbers are not good, but he isn't the worst and full team is working disaster. 19+ min for young defenseman in SJ is a tough job. Hope his career will go one. I like him as a player and he and his brother are good people.
 

RNCDevil

Registered User
Jun 21, 2008
7,347
3,206
Philadelphia, PA
Any chance Misyul will cheap shot the best players on the other team? Hitting is nice but it’s the cheap shots that put guys on LTIR rhat make a difference in thr NHL. Worst case scenario he’s suspended for two games.

@My3Sons reading your posts, I think we're feeling similarly. This Devils team may have some electric players but if the gameplan is out - just beat the living day lights out several players - how does a team counter it?

It did seem like the Devils were initiating more in the latter part of the Caps game. I LOVED seeing Smith annhilate that dirtbag Oshie. Do you just give more of license to Bahl, Smith, and Bastian to take some runs? You cannot appeal to referees. That much is clear.

Even if you have a spate of lopsides losses, penalty plagued games, even some 1-2 game suspension, do you have to just stand up and run some players? I don't like it, but if it's them or us and the league refuses to protect players, I think you have to, no?
 
Last edited:

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
@My3Sons reading your posts, I think we're feeling similarly. This Devils team may have some electric players but if the gameplan is out - just beat the living day lights out several players - how does a team counter it?

It did seem like the Devils were initiating more in the latter part of the Caps game. I LOVED seeing Smith annhilate that dirtbag Oshie. Do you just give more of license to Bahl, Smith, and Bastian to take some runs? You cannot appeal to referees. That much is clear.

Even if you have a spate of lopsides losses, penalty plagued games, even some 1-2 game suspension, do you have to just stand up and run some players? I don't like it, but if it's them or us and the league refuses to protect players, I think you have to, no?
That's my thinking. The league is so selective in its rules enforcement and its game management that by and large they will only call two or three penalties per side per game. if a play is borderline they may penalize it but the perpetrator gets a fine or a short suspension and the victim of an illegal hit may miss a substantial amount of time. There's very little downside to cheap shotting the best players on the other team. There is no comeuppance for the perpetrators and nobody really seems to care. Florida desperately tried to rally after Nico's hit on Barkov's leg last year and ultimately it didn't make any difference to anything. Tkachuk dragged Nico on the ice a bit but nobody cared and it didn't impact the outcome of anything and Nico never got beaten up over it. I have no doubt in that instance it was a genuine accident. But there are numerous instances where guys just push it too far and it's dangerous. Trouba's elbow, Wilson's head hunting, Marchand's stick work. These guys are never called to account and any league discipline is so minor in comparison to how dangerous what they have done that I'm surprised other teams don't go the same route. I don't advocate anyone being injured but I do advocate calling out the NHL for its BS on player safety and reffing.
 

MakoSlade

Registered User
Nov 17, 2005
828
416
New York City
It's a shame we have all these young defenseman not quite ready yet while we have a glaring hole in our defense. I do suspect we will see one or more of these guys (Nemec, Misyul, Vilen) before the season ends, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
32,898
32,079
NJ
It's a shame we have all these young defenseman not quite ready yet while we have a glaring hole in our defense. I do suspect we will see one or more of these guys (Nemec, Misyul, Vilen) before the season ends, though.

I mean Nemec is ready they're just not playing him. I also don't think the hole is a real issue personnel wise. Sure Smith sucks like a ton but the 6D is not making or breaking the team and he's not going to see the ice when games really matter.
 

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
7,076
18,516
St Petersburg
I mean Nemec is ready they're just not playing him. I also don't think the hole is a real issue personnel wise. Sure Smith sucks like a ton but the 6D is not making or breaking the team and he's not going to see the ice when games really matter.
I was with you on the same thinking line, but now I changed my thoughts a little. Smith creating a lot on the net, I mean GA, SA, HDSA etc. His GA/60 and xGf are bad and he doesnt do any help, everybody are better without him, and may be by his own he is making ~1GA per game, and he is taking a lot of penalties too. Again without any positive compensation he is trully net negative and he is making it against not the strongest opposition often.
So for a team without good goaltending and two first line centers(with different roles) he is making that huge damage that what outweighs the scales. Of course he isn’t the only issue, but I’m starting to think that it is a huge issue, that could bring us much more stable results and game, if Devils will replace him for some average. Of course I think the same about goaltending.
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
32,898
32,079
NJ
I was with you on the same thinking line, but now I changed my thoughts a little. Smith creating a lot on the net, I mean GA, SA, HDSA etc. His GA/60 and xGf are bad and he doesnt do any help, everybody are better without him, and may be by his own he is making ~1GA per game, and he is taking a lot of penalties too. Again without any positive compensation he is trully net negative and he is making it against not the strongest opposition often.
So for a team without good goaltending and two first line centers(with different roles) he is making that huge damage that what outweighs the scales. Of course he isn’t the only issue, but I’m starting to think that it is a huge issue, that could bring us much more stable results and game, if Devils will replace him for some average. Of course I think the same about goaltending.

He's obviously really bad at 5v5 and it is a hole but I just don't really think a 6D is a HUGE issue. As annoying as his penalties are he also draws a lot of calls. His penalty differential is even. He also has by far the best PK numbers on the team and hasn't given up a goal on the PK. Now part of that is likely due to him facing easier units but he's still playing 2 minutes on the PK a game and the numbers are elite elite. Min 25 PK minutes he has the 3rd best xGA/60 out of 121 guys and he is only one of 7 guys who hasn't been scored on

He sucks for sure and I've been saying I don't even really think he's NHL caliber anymore but I also don't think like if he was swapped out for some average 6D that it'd make a monumental difference. It'd be better for sure and I'm patiently awaiting the day Miller takes his spot but in the grand scheme of things but I don't think it's a transformative difference.

There is the question of who replaces him on the PK when he's gone. Now I do think if Miller is just treading water at 5v5 as an adequate 6D that's probably a bigger positive impact than the negative impact you'd lose from the PK. It just isn't going to be the massive change people might think it is. If we were going to replace him with a guy that could replace his PK value and be a huge 5v5 positive then I'd feel much more confident that it would actually be a pretty transformative change. I don't think going 11/7 and using Smith primarily as a PK specialist would be a bad idea (just please don't let it be at the expense of Holtz)

Now Nemec I think is a huge wildcard here. He has the ability to be a lot better than just an adequate 6D at 5v5. If he can come in close to the level some of the other highly touted D have immediately hitting the ground running as a legit top 4 caliber D then that's a huge boost at 5v5. That's a HUGE swing from Smith and even could be a pretty big swing from Miller. I'm not going to expect him to be nearly the PKer Smith is but if he can be a meh PKer and the rest of the PK can figure out their shit and get back to last years level that can help alleviate the Smith loss and 5v5 upgrade would be a big boon
 
Last edited:

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
7,076
18,516
St Petersburg
He's obviously really bad at 5v5 and it is a hole but I just don't really think a 6D is a HUGE issue. As annoying as his penalties are he also draws a lot of calls. His penalty differential is even. He also has by far the best PK numbers on the team and hasn't given up a goal on the PK. Now part of that is likely due to him facing easier units but he's still playing 2 minutes on the PK a game and the numbers are elite elite. Min 25 PK minutes he has the 3rd best xGA/60 out of 121 guys and he is only one of 7 guys who hasn't been scored on

He sucks for sure and I've been saying I don't even really think he's NHL caliber anymore but I also don't think like if he was swapped out for some average 6D that it'd make a monumental difference. It'd be better for sure and I'm patiently awaiting the day Miller takes his spot but in the grand scheme of things but I don't think it's a transformative difference.

There is the question of who replaces him on the PK when he's gone. Now I do think if Miller is just treading water at 5v5 as an adequate 6D that's probably a bigger positive impact than the negative impact you'd lose from the PK. It just isn't going to be the massive change people might think it is. If we were going to replace him with a guy that could replace his PK value and be a huge 5v5 positive then I'd feel much more confident that it would actually be a pretty transformative change. I don't think going 11/7 and using Smith primarily as a PK specialist would be a bad idea (just please don't let it be at the expense of Holtz)

Now Nemec I think is a huge wildcard here. He has the ability to be a lot better than just an adequate 6D at 5v5. If he can come in close to the level some of the other highly touted D have immediately hitting the ground running as a legit top 4 caliber D then that's a huge boost at 5v5. That's a HUGE swing from Smith and even could be a pretty big swing from Miller. I'm not going to expect him to be nearly the PKer Smith is but if he can be a meh PKer and the rest of the PK can figure out their shit and get back to last years level that can help alleviate the Smith loss and 5v5 upgrade would be a big boon
He is 1GA per game bad. I want to see Miller, I want to see Nemec over him. If we need in him in PK - use him as 12th forward. But we should stop using him as 5vs5 defenseman. At least we should try to watch what we have in other players.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad