Proposal: 3 way, NSH Karlsson TOR Subban OTT Futures

[BigFatCat999]

I have been running this rumor in my mind and I believe this is how the deal goes:

Nashville: Karlsson

Toronto: Subban

Ottawa: Marner plus other assorted futures

What is causing me pause is what Ottawa wants for futures considering their financial and owner considerations.

Click to read more...

 

[Sweetpotato]

No way TOR fans are going to agree to anything around Marner. You'd have to swap that to Nylander to get any positive reaction.

 

[Bringer of Jollity]

Toronto fans are not going to be happy.

I'm still not sure why the Preds trade an elite d-man with 4 years left on his deal for a pending UFA that will make more.

 

[firstemperor]

Leafs say no, we are not in any type of desperation to be blowing up the young core.

 

[93gilmour93]

Marner is a Leafs cornerstone for years to come. Not a chance.....

 

[Skin Tape Session]

Matthews, Nylander,Marner are not available. Try again next year.Hint- answer will be the same

thread/

 

[Gemel11]

Nashville would have to send something to Ottawa

 

[780il]

Switch Marner to Nylander then value is fair despite leafs fans telling you that its terrible and bracco + carrick + 3rd rounder is more reasonable.

 

[ChaoticOrange]

Matthews, Nylander,Marner are not available. Try again next year.Hint- answer will be the same

thread/

That means there’s an absolute zero chance you get a guy like Subban, right?

Gotta give to get and assorted lesser bits don’t get the job done. I get liking Marner a lot but it’s not like you’re not getting an elite player back.

 

[JetsHomer]

Subban > Karlsson > Marner

 

[3074326]

Leafs say no, we are not in any type of desperation to be blowing up the young core.

You're not blowing anything up. You're trading from an area of strength for a #1D.

But that's just my take.

 

[Brobust]

I'm trying to think back to the last time a team traded 20 year old budding superstar for a 30 year old superstar and had the trade work out for them.

 

[Brobust]

You're not blowing anything up. You're trading from an area of strength for a #1D.

But that's just my take.

That's Chiarelli logic. Searching for that elusive balance by killing your strength is just not a good idea.

 

[MoreMogilny]

Subban > Karlsson > Marner

In terms of on ice impact as of right now, sure. But when it comes to value to the teams, specifically Toronto, I wouldn’t move Marner for either of those two.

 

[Bjornar Moxnes]

Subban > Karlsson > Marner

Um no, Karlsson is still the best no matter how much people try to spin it.

 

[Kelly]

Marner is not available.

 

[thunder16]

Subban > Karlsson > Marner

Subban>Karlsson>Laine .... Subban for laine +

 

[3074326]

That's Chiarelli logic. Searching for that elusive balance by killing your strength is just not a good idea.

The Leafs would still be loaded at center. What are you talking about.

It's a horrible comparison. Chiarelli traded the team's best player, and it was not an area of strength. The current Leafs roster has tons of depth... Except on D. Which that trade addresses in spades.

 

[Brobust]

The Leafs would still be loaded at center. What are you talking about.

It's a horrible comparison. Chiarelli traded the team's best player, and it was not an area of strength. The current Leafs roster has tons of depth... Except on D. Which that trade addresses in spades.

Who is even talking about centres? Marner is a winger. Trading him would definitely hurt the offensive depth of the team.

Also, Chiarelli traded Hall. He didn't trade McDavid. Not yet anyway.

Even Seguin wasn't the best player on the Bruins team.

 

[MR4]

Lol at Ottawa fans thinking they aren't going to get f***ed on a Karlsson deal.

Asking for Marner +? Hahahaha if that's what you guys are expecting, I can't wait to see the outrage over the trade. If it even gets done, maybe he goes to UFA for free

 

[Spirit of 67]

OMG. Not a friggin' chance.

And people need to stop trying to trade elite d men to us. We aren't interested.

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

Subban > Karlsson > Marner

you got it backwards somehow

 

[Liferleafer]

I have been running this rumor in my mind and I believe this is how the deal goes:

Nashville: Karlsson

Toronto: Subban

Ottawa: Marner plus other assorted futures

What is causing me pause is what Ottawa wants for futures considering their financial and owner considerations.

A. Why does Nashville trade Subban with 4 years left for Karlsson...a purely iffensive D with one year left before making more than Subban?

B. No thank you to moving Marner.

 

[ConnorMcNugesaitl]

That's Chiarelli logic. Searching for that elusive balance by killing your strength is just not a good idea.

Not really, the logic is sound but the execution is horrendous because Chiarelli sucks at his job.

I don't really get why Leafs fans would be 100% against moving a Nylander when they're getting a player like Subban back but then this place tends to heavily over rate prospects.

LOL just above me there's a Leafs fan claiming Marner>Subban and Karlsson.

Now that is Chiarelli level.

 

[Liferleafer]

Subban > Karlsson > Marner

Sure...so leave Toronto out of it.