Am I missing something? He said we need help on the wing in our prospect pool... when wing is the strongest position in our prospect pool. Where we need a little bit of help on wing is in our NHL lineup for the coming season, not our prospect pool.
But anyway, it doesn't mean we couldn't draft another winger anyway. If that's the best player. It just sounds weird to justify doing so by claiming that's something we're particularly lacking.
Yeah I think you're missing the specific thing I quoted which was a misquote (but seemingly a joke) of the article. D is probably our weakest link in the prospect pool but I don't think any of us are lining up to take one of those. It will be either an F or a C. And like you I hope we go with BPA at F or C at 15 (and 24).
Why am I even debating this? I just had issue with the way the article was quoted and really couldn't care less which position we take at 15 as long as it's not a G and preferably not a D.