Henkka
Registered User
See Calgary as only fit for Howard.
But Nyquist could be fit to all Calgary, Boston, Islanders, Jets, Nashville, Pens.
But Nyquist could be fit to all Calgary, Boston, Islanders, Jets, Nashville, Pens.
Technically, we have NYI's 2nd this year, they have Calgary's 2nd.Contenders who have their 1st
1. Tampa - (2019 1st is conditional for NYR of McDonagh trade), 2020+2021 available
2. Calgary - has all 2019, 2020, 2021 1sts (2nd pick 2019 traded)
3. Boston - has all 1-2-3 round picks for 2019,2020,2021.
4. NY Islanders - has all 1+2 round picks for 2019,2020,2021.
5. San Jose - has sold 2019+2020 1st picks, has Florida 2nd rounder only for 2019 and own 1st for 2021.
6. Toronto - has sold 2019 1st for Muzzin. Has the rest of 1-2-3 round picks for 2019,2020,2021.
7. Winnipeg - has all 1-2 round picks for 2019,2020,2021.
8. Washington - has all 1st round picks for 2019,2020,2021, but has no cap space.
9. Nashville - has all 1st round picks for 2019,2020,2021.
10. Columbus - has sold 2019+2020 1st picks + all 2nd rounders from next 3 years.
11. Pittsburgh - has all 1sts for 2019,2020,2021, has sold 2nd rounders for 2019+2020.
See Calgary as only fit for Howard.
But Nyquist could be fit to all Calgary, Boston, Islanders, Jets, Nashville, Pens.
What about something like
Nyquist + Howard + CBJ 5th 2019
to Calgary for
Smith + Mangiapane(?) + CGY 1st 2019 + CGY 3rd 2020
Howard and/ or Nyquist retained on as much as necessary to complete the deal
If I'm the Sharks, I wouldn't be in love with the possibility of renting Howard for a 1st-round pick. As a Red Wings fan, I love the idea though.
I would be even less in love with the idea of giving up a 1st-round pick to rent Howard if I was Calgary than I would be if I was the Sharks. Vegas less so still.For Howard, I think that Calgary is the most logical place. A team like Vegas, who have some room, could be a dark horse pick. Fleury is great but some insurance would be good and they do have a lot of picks and prospects. Would Subban be good enough to start a playoff game?
Why do you think we'd sign him 4-6 years if we think he can only help for 1-2 years? If we only get a 2nd or 3rd in return, chances are extremely good that we never get anywhere near the same return on that pick as we get from re-signing Nyquist. The idea that "futures" is always preferable is how you end up in a rebuild that takes forever. It's one thing when we're talking about players that are way too old to be relevant in 2-3 years, or depth players that we have plenty of replacements for (Jensen). Nyquist is in a category of player that you sell if you get a good price (see Tatar deal), but don't dump just for the sake of any futures at all.Well they wouldn't be, they would be doing it for whatever futures they can get, whether you think it's worth it or not. Re-signing a guy for 4-6 years because he might help a bit for another year or two is exactly how you end up with contracts you regret. These are the kind of signings you make when your an actual competitive team, not bottom of the league.
Why do you think we'd sign him 4-6 years if we think he can only help for 1-2 years? If we only get a 2nd or 3rd in return, chances are extremely good that we never get anywhere near the same return on that pick as we get from re-signing Nyquist. The idea that "futures" is always preferable is how you end up in a rebuild that takes forever. It's one thing when we're talking about players that are way too old to be relevant in 2-3 years, or depth players that we have plenty of replacements for (Jensen). Nyquist is in a category of player that you sell if you get a good price (see Tatar deal), but don't dump just for the sake of any futures at all.
The other thing about Gus and his NTC is that a lot of players hate the travel in the Western conference. Gus would know that issue first hand.
Well word is the Wings camp don't want to pay Nyquist's ask of 5.5mX5yrs so IF we re-sign him it's unlikely the contract is massive. More than he makes now? Probably, but not by a huge amount. Maybe even a lower % of the cap compared to when he signed his last contract.If nyquist cant bring in a decent(2nd plus decent prospect) of good(1st) return then why is he worth resigning and paying very very likely more than he is currently being paid?
If you think he would sign his most important contract of his career for less than his current, you're out to lunch.
A lot of players also hate losing, which would be the case at Detroit for rest of the season.
And if he didn’t waive I’d be of the opinion that re-signing shouldn’t happen.I have a gut feeling Nyquist didn't waive his NTC. People seem to be forgetting he can just block all trades. That list he was asked to submit could be zero teams long.
If that's true, which I doubt IMO, I've lost bunch of respect for him lolI have a gut feeling Nyquist didn't waive his NTC. People seem to be forgetting he can just block all trades. That list he was asked to submit could be zero teams long.
I agree. Unless its a 2 year deal or less, which Nyquist obviously isn't interested in at this point in his career.And if he didn’t waive I’d be of the opinion that re-signing shouldn’t happen.