The thing that confuses me about Hall of Fames is that nobody ever argues that the players inducted into the Hockey Hall of Fame need to be 'famous/popular', first and foremost, rather than good, do they?
I like the idea of it if it's advertised as 'only the greats make it in and that's the criteria', which I initially thought it was, but if it's the 'Hall of Fame' of Rock, as in it's simply a measure of popularity, who gives a flying ****? You have the sales figures already.
At that point, it doesn't even matter to me that it's organized in a farcical way, which it is-- the premise of measuring fame rather than greatness is already kind of stupid to begin with, IMO.