NFL: 2018 NFL draft prospects thread

RedRenegade

Registered User
Sep 16, 2008
873
13
I don't really have a top pick but I'll be happy with any of these at #1 - Mayfield, Rosen, and Darnold. If I had to pick one I might say Mayfield. Lamar Jackson would have my full support but I feel like he would be a bit more roll of the dice. Don't want Allen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: What the Faulk

member 157595

Guest
I've not seen much of Allen but I sure didn't like what I saw. I know I'm oversimplifying this, but what good are Allen's physical attributes if he seemingly cannot throw accurately? I'd take Jackson over him easily.
 

HoseEmDown

Registered User
Mar 25, 2012
17,471
3,691
I've not seen much of Allen but I sure didn't like what I saw. I know I'm oversimplifying this, but what good are Allen's physical attributes if he seemingly cannot throw accurately? I'd take Jackson over him easily.

The thing with accuracy numbers in college is that they can be skewed by the type of offense you run. You run a spread with heavy amounts of bubble screens and you're going to have a higher completion % than a pro style that goes down the field more often. I remember seeing something showing Jalen Hurts of Alabama threw 40% of his passes behind the line of scrimmage and he never threw inside the hash marks, everything was to the sidelines. I don't know the tendencies for all the teams throwing patterns but I know Mayfield and Jackson were in more quick throw spreads while Darnold, Rosen and Allen pro style deep throws. That's why I think Rosen and Allen could be the most successful going forward.
 

member 157595

Guest
The thing with accuracy numbers in college is that they can be skewed by the type of offense you run. You run a spread with heavy amounts of bubble screens and you're going to have a higher completion % than a pro style that goes down the field more often. I remember seeing something showing Jalen Hurts of Alabama threw 40% of his passes behind the line of scrimmage and he never threw inside the hash marks, everything was to the sidelines. I don't know the tendencies for all the teams throwing patterns but I know Mayfield and Jackson were in more quick throw spreads while Darnold, Rosen and Allen pro style deep throws. That's why I think Rosen and Allen could be the most successful going forward.

I totally agree that completion percentage is a highly flawed stat, and I have Rosen as my top QB this year. That said, Allen has great size and a great arm, but I haven't seen much evidence he can put the appropriate touch on a football consistently. Lamar Jackson also has a great arm and is more accurate than Allen even when making NFL throws IMO, and since neither is ready to start in the NFL yet I'm taking the one that not only throws the football better but who is a lightning-in-a-bottle athlete and a matchup nightmare. I'm no pro scout though.
 

Dominator13

Registered User
Feb 20, 2003
19,484
1,057
hockey city
Dominator13
Everyone talks about the Colts trading down again, but with Myles Garrett and Carlos Hyde already in town, I think the Browns would be crazy not trading that 4th overall to get more picks. They already get their franchise QB at #1.

If the Bills end up as a trade partner, they could get both McGlinchey and Hernandez to smooth the loss of Joe Thomas.
 

Avs_19

Registered User
Jun 28, 2007
84,936
33,160


I don't like seeing people speculating about the run on OL that may come in the mid-late first round. I thought the Vikings might be able to choose from a couple of guys at 30 but there's a chance Wynn, Hernandez, Daniels, and Ragnow could all be gone by then.
 

What the Faulk

You'll know when you go
May 30, 2005
42,121
3,851
North Carolina


I don't like seeing people speculating about the run on OL that may come in the mid-late first round. I thought the Vikings might be able to choose from a couple of guys at 30 but there's a chance Wynn, Hernandez, Daniels, and Ragnow could all be gone by then.


That seems to be the likely position pick of the Panthers from what I understand
 
Jul 29, 2003
31,643
5,347
Saskatoon
Visit site
Everyone talks about the Colts trading down again, but with Myles Garrett and Carlos Hyde already in town, I think the Browns would be crazy not trading that 4th overall to get more picks. They already get their franchise QB at #1.

If the Bills end up as a trade partner, they could get both McGlinchey and Hernandez to smooth the loss of Joe Thomas.

Depending on the Giants and Broncos both trade downs could reasonably happen, but I get the sense Cleveland just wants to stay put. Not sure who their guy is there, have a feeling it's Chubb.

The Colts are also interesting because I think they've zeroed in on one of the LBs. I think there's a good chance one or both will be there at 11 or 12 but that's a hell of a risk, one that really didnt pan out for me in the mock draft.
 

Troy McClure

Suter will never be scratched
Mar 12, 2002
47,952
15,854
South of Heaven
The Browns would be stupid to trade down. They don't need more picks. They need players. A dude like Chubb would be an awesome addition. He would do a lot more for them than getting an extra pick next season.
 

Beerfish

Registered User
Apr 14, 2007
19,513
5,665
The Browns would be stupid to trade down. They don't need more picks. They need players. A dude like Chubb would be an awesome addition. He would do a lot more for them than getting an extra pick next season.

Agreed, they already have a boat load of picks this year and they can get prime building blocks at 1 and 4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYRFANMANI

member 157595

Guest
The Browns would be stupid to trade down. They don't need more picks. They need players. A dude like Chubb would be an awesome addition. He would do a lot more for them than getting an extra pick next season.
If the Giants keep their pick I don't know if Chubb makes it to #4. If he does, the Browns would be stupid (insert joke here) to pass him up. Garrett and Chubb together could cause OT nightmares.
 

InjuredChoker

Registered User
Dec 25, 2011
31,402
345
LTIR or golf course
The thing with accuracy numbers in college is that they can be skewed by the type of offense you run. You run a spread with heavy amounts of bubble screens and you're going to have a higher completion % than a pro style that goes down the field more often. I remember seeing something showing Jalen Hurts of Alabama threw 40% of his passes behind the line of scrimmage and he never threw inside the hash marks, everything was to the sidelines. I don't know the tendencies for all the teams throwing patterns but I know Mayfield and Jackson were in more quick throw spreads while Darnold, Rosen and Allen pro style deep throws. That's why I think Rosen and Allen could be the most successful going forward.

comp. % is a flawed stat, especially in college. but with allen's comp % and YPA combo is so bad that like within the past 20 years no college QB with numbers like that has ever been successful. he also threw higher % of his passes (30%) 0-5 yards beyond the LOS than mayfield, rosen and darnold. allen certainly isn't accurate on tape either.

louisville under gutless mother f***er bobby petrino runs a pro style offense, it just has quite a bit of spread/option concepts mixed in. which applies for many NFL teams as well.
 

Troy McClure

Suter will never be scratched
Mar 12, 2002
47,952
15,854
South of Heaven
comp. % is a flawed stat, especially in college. but with allen's comp % and YPA combo is so bad that like within the past 20 years no college QB with numbers like that has ever been successful. he also threw higher % of his passes (30%) 0-5 yards beyond the LOS than mayfield, rosen and darnold. allen certainly isn't accurate on tape either.

louisville under gutless mother ****er bobby petrino runs a pro style offense, it just has quite a bit of spread/option concepts mixed in. which applies for many NFL teams as well.
There are ways to dig into these numbers to better understand what a guy brings. I remember Colt McCoy had super impressive completion percentages, but then one guy said if you look at passes that go only five yards beyond the line of scrimmage, McCoy's numbers became some of the worst when compared to his peers in college football. That certainly translated into him falling to the third round and struggling to do much as a pro.

I think with Allen the problem is no one can find any way to evaluate him without bringing up accuracy problems, whether you're looking at flawed completion percentage stats, situational/fancy stats, or watching tape.
 

Boris Le Tigre

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Jan 9, 2007
6,079
611
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Cleveland is in a pretty plumb spot right now. They might be able to get out of the draft with 2 of these 3 players: Barkley, Chubb, and Fitzpatrick.

Browns should avoid taking a QB first. This year’s draft is deep at QB and most reports are split in who they favour to be the best.

I’d take Barkley and (if Chubb /Fitzpatrick are not available at 4; trade down to a spot where they can get an OT/DB/DT and an extra pick.
 

member 157595

Guest
I saw a blurb on Rotoworld that someone thinks the Browns will take two QBs in the top five. I think that’s an awful idea.
That's...a Carolina Reaper of a hot take. The Browns need playmakers everywhere, pick your top QB at #1 and develop him properly.
 

spintheblackcircle

incoming!!!
Mar 1, 2002
66,375
12,311
Yes, I'm the guy that thought Paxton Lynch would be great and Wentz would be a stiff. Guilty.

.....but I just don't see Allen.
 

Avs_19

Registered User
Jun 28, 2007
84,936
33,160


I don't know how many of the draft analysts are factoring in a potential health concern with Hurst but his range is all over the place. I've seen him as a top 15 player in the entire draft and others don't even have him as a 1st round pick.
 

spintheblackcircle

incoming!!!
Mar 1, 2002
66,375
12,311


I don't know how many of the draft analysts are factoring in a potential health concern with Hurst but his range is all over the place. I've seen him as a top 15 player in the entire draft and others don't even have him as a 1st round pick.


Fanspeak's On the Clock NFL Mock Draft Simulator

This draft simulator has a large range for him, I've seen some with him as late as the top of the third round and some as high as #15.
 

Troy McClure

Suter will never be scratched
Mar 12, 2002
47,952
15,854
South of Heaven
Yes, I'm the guy that thought Paxton Lynch would be great and Wentz would be a stiff. Guilty.

.....but I just don't see Allen.
He’s the one of these top four I would be disappointed to see the Browns take. They just went through trying to think their could coach Kizer into an accurate passer. Allen is certainly a better prospect than Kizer, but let some other team take Allen with the thought they can teach him to pass.
 

edguy

Registered User
Feb 5, 2014
8,915
1,455
Charlottetown, PEI
Josh Allen is such a polarizing guy.. The more I watch videos of his off season work the more I like him, but man why did he not dominate in college with an arm like that?

I still think the safe pick is Darnold, but Allen has an arm to be one of the best.

Hard to be disappointed with either, but one is wayy more raw of a prospect then the other.
 

Gene Parmesan

Dedicated to babies who came feet first
Jul 23, 2009
84,758
2,406
California
Josh Allen is such a polarizing guy.. The more I watch videos of his off season work the more I like him, but man why did he not dominate in college with an arm like that?

I still think the safe pick is Darnold, but Allen has an arm to be one of the best.

Hard to be disappointed with either, but one is wayy more raw of a prospect then the other.

Because there is more to being a quarterback than arm strength. He has poor instincts and vision. Doesn't feel pressure. Darnold doesn't have his arm but he's a much better passer and has plus instincts and awareness.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad