I've asked before, but I'm still curious if anyone voting for Farabee can explain why it's not a serious concern that he's scored at the same rate as Rocco Grimaldi, Peter Mueller, Patrick Eaves, Colin Wilson, Jack Roslovic, and Jeremy Morin while playing in about as favorable of a situation as you can imagine on a line with Hughes and Wahlstrom. He seems like a very unappealing choice to me and I'd be interested in understanding what the other side of the argument is.
I voted for Kotkaniemi. He outproduced Teravainen, Aho, Kapanen, and Rantanen in their pre-draft years and he still doesn't turn 18 for 2 more months. He's not only really good right now, but I think his young age means he is one of the players with the most upside from here too.
I would be ok with Dobson, but I'm seriously conflicted about not voting for Kravstov. I know he's not projected to go this high, but his KHL production is comparable to Panarin, Kaprizov, and Kuznetsov and better than Kucherov or Buchnevich, and that's before he went nuts in the playoffs. He obviously has tons of skill. On hockey talent & production alone, it seems to me like he could arguably be in the conversation with Svechnikov and Zadina for the 2nd or 3rd pick. Why shouldn't he be getting more consideration here?