Line Combos: 2017-18 Lineup

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
25,533
19,978
Maine
Based on who is on the current roster, this is my guess as to what they will role out tomorrow night, at least to start off the game. Cassidy isn't afraid to tweak lines as the game goes on.


Marchand -- Bergeron -- Bjork

DeBrusk -- Krejci -- Pasta

Agostino -- Backes -- Senyshyn

Schaller -- Nash -- Kuraly


Chara -- McAvoy

Krug -- Carlo

Postma -- Miller
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,519
22,226
Based on who is on the current roster, this is my guess as to what they will role out tomorrow night, at least to start off the game. Cassidy isn't afraid to tweak lines as the game goes on.


Marchand -- Bergeron -- Bjork

DeBrusk -- Krejci -- Pasta

Agostino -- Backes -- Senyshyn

Schaller -- Nash -- Kuraly


Chara -- McAvoy

Krug -- Carlo

Postma -- Miller

Was Senyshyn recalled?
 

gumgum

Registered User
Oct 15, 2017
772
510
Was Senyshyn recalled?

divver and a few others seem to believe it’s purely a paper transaction relating to adam going on ltir. couple that with senyshyn’s occasionally exciting but mostly non-factor level of play with the p-bruins, and i’d wager it is just that.
 

PlayMakers

Moderator
Aug 9, 2004
25,221
25,085
Medfield, MA
www.medpuck.com
divver and a few others seem to believe it’s purely a paper transaction relating to adam going on ltir. couple that with senyshyn’s occasionally exciting but mostly non-factor level of play with the p-bruins, and i’d wager it is just that.

Your profile pic reminds me of Ladiesman217.

300px-Movie_Sam%27s_eBay_profile.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: gumgum

neelynugs

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
35,470
10,012
so wait, david backes was playing center at practice? surprised there's no discussion on this, or maybe i just missed it.
 

PlayMakers

Moderator
Aug 9, 2004
25,221
25,085
Medfield, MA
www.medpuck.com


Finally!!! Backes in the middle. REALLY looking forward to seeing him there, and I like him with DeBrusk too. I'm hoping they have such good chemistry that when Cehlarik is 100% they can try him again with Krejci and Pastrnak and will feel good about building a 3rd SCORING line around DeBrusk and Backes.

Please be good, please be good, please be good. :crossfing
 
  • Like
Reactions: HustleB

Mr. Make-Believe

The happy genius of my household
Lines I'd like to see when Krejci is back...

Marchand - Bergeron - Bjork
Cehlarik - Krejci - Pastrnak
DeBrusk - Backes - Heinen
Vatrano - Nash/Kuraly - Czarnik

Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
3rd pair still a mess. Need a puck mover to play with 86/54.

Talk about a lineup I can get behind... Flawless. Love it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayMakers

Mainehockey33

Powerplay Specialist
Jul 15, 2011
10,225
7,764
Maine
Lines I'd like to see when Krejci is back...

Marchand - Bergeron - Bjork
Cehlarik - Krejci - Pastrnak
DeBrusk - Backes - Heinen
Vatrano - Nash/Kuraly - Czarnik

Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
3rd pair still a mess. Need a puck mover to play with 86/54.

I was going to say maybe no to Czarnik on the fourth but maybe Czarnik helps Vatrano since they’ve had chemistry before.

You’re right about the redundance of 86/54 on the third pair, but Mcquaid is out so it’s time to look for someone else anyway. Postma has a good shot and O’Gara is solid, but no puck mover. Not sure I want Grizz on the Bruins full time though.
 

pemulis

Registered User
Sponsor
Jun 15, 2008
914
387
postdocing in Sydney
Lines I'd like to see when Krejci is back...

Marchand - Bergeron - Bjork
Cehlarik - Krejci - Pastrnak
DeBrusk - Backes - Heinen
Vatrano - Nash/Kuraly - Czarnik

Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
3rd pair still a mess. Need a puck mover to play with 86/54.

I like it. But all those young guys on the wing make me nervous, only Marchand and Pastrnak (oh wait Vatrano has played 89) have played over a season's worth of games. It could be dynamite though or a failure. If you integrate the defensive deficiencies to that group, then I think there is no way that lineup could work. But what do I know?!
 

bob27

Grzelcyk is a top pairing defenceman
Apr 2, 2015
3,332
1,426
I don't think that Krejci and Pastrnak work well together. Both like handling the puck too much. Personally I would put Pastrnak back with Bergeron and Marchand, but if isn't an option maybe having him on the 3rd line with Backes as a center could be an option.
 

GloryDaze4877

Barely Irrelevant
Jun 27, 2006
44,395
13,873
The Sticks (West MA)
Lines I'd like to see when Krejci is back...

Marchand - Bergeron - Bjork
Cehlarik - Krejci - Pastrnak
DeBrusk - Backes - Heinen
Vatrano - Nash/Kuraly - Czarnik

Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
3rd pair still a mess. Need a puck mover to play with 86/54.


Like it a lot.

Would prefer some beef over Czarnik in Acciari/White.

O’Gara - Miller 3rd pair.

While ROG isn’t a traditional PMD, his puck retrieval is good and so is his transition/first pass.
 

Tampbear

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
1,662
389
Tampa
I like it. But all those young guys on the wing make me nervous, only Marchand and Pastrnak (oh wait Vatrano has played 89) have played over a season's worth of games. It could be dynamite though or a failure. If you integrate the defensive deficiencies to that group, then I think there is no way that lineup could work. But what do I know?!
Man I've stared at this post for too long trying to come up with a good calculus joke but it's too early.
 

PlayMakers

Moderator
Aug 9, 2004
25,221
25,085
Medfield, MA
www.medpuck.com
Would prefer some beef over Czarnik in Acciari/White.

I was going to say maybe no to Czarnik on the fourth but maybe Czarnik helps Vatrano since they’ve had chemistry before.

Bingo. I think if you replace Czarnik with "beef" you lose Vatrano's goal scoring potential. He needs a passer. Nash and White aren't going to set him up.
 

PlayMakers

Moderator
Aug 9, 2004
25,221
25,085
Medfield, MA
www.medpuck.com
O’Gara - Miller 3rd pair.

While ROG isn’t a traditional PMD, his puck retrieval is good and so is his transition/first pass.

O'Gara is definitely the most deserving of the spot. And both he and Kevan Miller are better 'first passers' than McQuaid so maybe they do okay together.

I didn't hate Grzelcyk's game, although I don't love the idea of both he and Krug in the same lineup... Zboril or Lauzon are the guys I'd really like to see in that spot but I understand not wanting to rush them.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,519
22,226
O'Gara is definitely the most deserving of the spot. And both he and Kevan Miller are better 'first passers' than McQuaid so maybe they do okay together.

I didn't hate Grzelcyk's game, although I don't love the idea of both he and Krug in the same lineup... Zboril or Lauzon are the guys I'd really like to see in that spot but I understand not wanting to rush them.

I think it's challenging to insert Gryz into a line-up with both Krug and McAvoy given the special teams roles. Assuming they wouldn't want Gryz killing penalties, they would have to insert Krug or McAvoy (likely McAvoy) onto one of the two PK pairings.

And if they did that, would they have to then remove McAvoy from PP unit 2 and put Gryz there, or else they have a D-man in Gryz who has no special teams role whatsoever, putting more pressure and minutes onto the rest of the group.
 

Tampbear

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
1,662
389
Tampa
I like it. But all those young guys on the wing make me nervous, only Marchand and Pastrnak (oh wait Vatrano has played 89) have played over a season's worth of games. It could be dynamite though or a failure. If you integrate the defensive deficiencies to that group, then I think there is no way that lineup could work. But what do I know?!
All right I think I've got it.
If we could find the derivative of the rookies we could find the rate of change of improvement to see if their improvement will come early enough in the season to compensate for current defensive deficiencies.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,519
22,226
I missed the lines, never mind the discussion:



I missed this yesterday. Wow, Backes as a center. I'm floored.

Like PM said, please be good. If this team can get it's center-ice position on lock-down, I believe slowly but surely the pieces on the wing will fall in place. Putting Backes there is one step closer to that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mainehockey33

Fenian24

Registered User
Jun 14, 2010
10,406
13,575
Lines I'd like to see when Krejci is back...

Marchand - Bergeron - Bjork
Cehlarik - Krejci - Pastrnak
DeBrusk - Backes - Heinen
Vatrano - Nash/Kuraly - Czarnik

Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
3rd pair still a mess. Need a puck mover to play with 86/54.

I wouldn't put two rookies with Backes, I haven't got another answer right now and I like DeBrusk on the third line until he becomes more consistent. Heinen has been proving me wrong, I think they have too many players like him but he has been ok in the games he has played. Not sure if he was good or the fact the team was a dumpster fire.

Austin Czarnik is everything I hate about the NHL today, a AHL/NHL tweener with no size, grit, guts, hitting skill or intimidation factor. It's nice that he is fast but he brings nothing else to the table at the NHL level. He will become the next koklachev, many of the small, speed and skill over size and toughness crowd will love him but the game has not changed that much that he brings anything of value to a fourth line, or a third line, if he had the aforementioned skill he would be a top 6 player, he isn't and I doubt at his age and size ever will be.

If they go with Cehlarik on the second line he needs to produce, some may have felt he "fit" with Krecji and Pastrnak last year but 2 assists in 11 games is not production you can have from a top six player and expect to win. If you are looking for that level of production Ryan White can contribute it.

Vatrano has been ok and I like Kuraly but would really like a traditional fourth line RW with them.

The third D pair just needs to be solid, for all the grief McQuaid takes the silence regarding Brandon Carlos play since the halfway point of last year has been stunning. I said at the time I move him for Landeskog, Carlo may never reach the potential he showed in the first 40 games last year, Landeskog is a legitimate top 6 forward who could slot in on the right of Bergeron or left of Krecji.

I still say, from what I have seen so far this year, they overvalued their prospects and are going to be paying for it for years to come, turning down trades and making bad free agent signings isn't going to make them contenders again anytime soon. Welcome to the mid 90's again, Ted Donato and Steve Hienze will lead us to glory.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,519
22,226
I still say, from what I have seen so far this year, they overvalued their prospects and are going to be paying for it for years to come, turning down trades and making bad free agent signings isn't going to make them contenders again anytime soon.

What trades did they turn down?

Refusing to trade a 20-year old Top 4 right-shot D-man (where they don't have a lot of long-term depth in the system at RD) for a UFA-in-two year's Duchene or another left-shot winger in Landeskog? Not to mention we don't know what else Colorado asked for on top of Carlo.

Did you happen to notice that they just had not one, but two, left-shot rookie wingers break camp with the team?

Or that Bjork's production thus far in Boston is equal what Landeskog's is in Colorado, in less games no less.

Not trading for a couple Colorado forwards is going to make this team pay for year's to come? Give me a break.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DKH

GloryDaze4877

Barely Irrelevant
Jun 27, 2006
44,395
13,873
The Sticks (West MA)
I wouldn't put two rookies with Backes, I haven't got another answer right now and I like DeBrusk on the third line until he becomes more consistent. Heinen has been proving me wrong, I think they have too many players like him but he has been ok in the games he has played. Not sure if he was good or the fact the team was a dumpster fire.

Austin Czarnik is everything I hate about the NHL today, a AHL/NHL tweener with no size, grit, guts, hitting skill or intimidation factor. It's nice that he is fast but he brings nothing else to the table at the NHL level. He will become the next koklachev, many of the small, speed and skill over size and toughness crowd will love him but the game has not changed that much that he brings anything of value to a fourth line, or a third line, if he had the aforementioned skill he would be a top 6 player, he isn't and I doubt at his age and size ever will be.

If they go with Cehlarik on the second line he needs to produce, some may have felt he "fit" with Krecji and Pastrnak last year but 2 assists in 11 games is not production you can have from a top six player and expect to win. If you are looking for that level of production Ryan White can contribute it.

Vatrano has been ok and I like Kuraly but would really like a traditional fourth line RW with them.

The third D pair just needs to be solid, for all the grief McQuaid takes the silence regarding Brandon Carlos play since the halfway point of last year has been stunning. I said at the time I move him for Landeskog, Carlo may never reach the potential he showed in the first 40 games last year, Landeskog is a legitimate top 6 forward who could slot in on the right of Bergeron or left of Krecji.

I still say, from what I have seen so far this year, they overvalued their prospects and are going to be paying for it for years to come, turning down trades and making bad free agent signings isn't going to make them contenders again anytime soon. Welcome to the mid 90's again, Ted Donato and Steve Hienze will lead us to glory.

You keep saying that Heinen is too similar to a bunch of other players the B’s have.

Serious question, who are all these guys he is similar to? I don’t see it.

The guy I think he’s most similar to is probably Krejci (pass first guy who is defensively/postionally sound).
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad