The players that they may be interested in would probably be Zibanejad or Hoffman.
Rumor: 2015-2016 Season Trade Rumours & Proposals | Part V
- Thread starter Caeldan
- Start date
- Status
The players that they may be interested in would probably be Zibanejad or Hoffman.
Our LW depth is instantly atrocious.
Not that I don't want Shattenkirk, trust me I really do.
Ryan can play LW too.
I guess it depends on what happens with Puempel, Prince, and even Paul.
Not to mention MacArthur.
Meh ryan moves over. Puempel rides shotgun with RNH.
I would be happy with just one of those two d men.
Do Make Say Think
& Yet & Yet
- Jun 26, 2007
- 51,169
- 9,909
Vesa Awesaka
#KeepTheSenate
- Jul 4, 2013
- 18,236
- 25
2 of his 3 30 goal seasons were as a LW. In his one game as a LW as a senator he scored a goal(although it was on the pp from the right side
)
Real Smart Sens Fan
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2014
- 4,760
- 4
This is a pretty off the wall trade suggestion, but one that I think could actually work out
Curtis Lazar + Chris Neil + Chiasson/Prince/2nd
for
Kevin Hayes + Keith Yandle
with picks conditional on Yandle and Neil resigning
Rangers get some fwd depth, get Chris Neil (a guy who they've been supposedly interested in for years)
Lazar and Hayes are basically opposites: Hayes produces pretty well but is criticized for a total lack of effort at times, whereas Lazar has struggled to produce but is always giving a great effort. This trade is pretty dependent on Lazar being the most valuable piece, which I think he is. Sens are probably the team adding.
Curtis Lazar + Chris Neil + Chiasson/Prince/2nd
for
Kevin Hayes + Keith Yandle
with picks conditional on Yandle and Neil resigning
Rangers get some fwd depth, get Chris Neil (a guy who they've been supposedly interested in for years)
Lazar and Hayes are basically opposites: Hayes produces pretty well but is criticized for a total lack of effort at times, whereas Lazar has struggled to produce but is always giving a great effort. This trade is pretty dependent on Lazar being the most valuable piece, which I think he is. Sens are probably the team adding.
That's a really bad deal that wouldn't work. Rangers would block Murray's #.
Also, Chiasson, a 2nd, Prince and Puempel, have very different values.
If we made a move like your suggested RNH trade, then ya I could see trading Zibby for a guy like Brodin.
Unfortunately we'll probably see a much smaller move once we are closer to the trade deadline.
Real Smart Sens Fan
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2014
- 4,760
- 4
Why not? Give me some suggestions. Its a baseline for a deal, Yandle and Hayes are definitely available and I think NYR would definitely have interest in Neil and/or Lazar as pieces to acquire.
I don't see Yandle getting a player like Lazar on his own. Neil + 2nd/Prince is probably a fair price for Hayes.
Sensinitis
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2012
- 15,934
- 5,526
2 of his 3 30 goal seasons were as a LW. In his one game as a LW as a senator he scored a goal(although it was on the pp from the right side
Playing with prime Perry and Getzlaf. That helps.
FolignoQuantumLeap
Don't Hold The Door
2 of his 3 30 goal seasons were as a LW. In his one game as a LW as a senator he scored a goal(although it was on the pp from the right side
He just played like 8 games on LW with Stone snd Turris. IMO Ryan doesn't have the wheels to be an off wing forward. Guys can close on him too quick and it's too hard to protect the puck on zone entries and in the neutral zone.
Caeldan
Whippet Whisperer
- Jun 21, 2008
- 15,459
- 1,046
Someone else who we really haven't talked about but supposedly is available is Byfuglien.
That could be a very interesting option too I think, though he is right-handed as well. I'd contemplate moving Ceci even for him though, if we'd be willing to give him the 6.5-7M he's reportedly looking for.
That could be a very interesting option too I think, though he is right-handed as well. I'd contemplate moving Ceci even for him though, if we'd be willing to give him the 6.5-7M he's reportedly looking for.
Neil is a rental for them, he'd be acquired purely as a rental player for the playoffs and for depth purposes. I don't think the Rangers would give much to acquire him and I doubt they'd resign him also. Probably a 4rth rounder? definitely not a player they would give up valuable assets to acquire and let's not forget that the Rangers are going to make the playoffs (most probably) and they'll want to have player that will help them now to reach their goal.
Therefore, if they trade Hayes they'll likely want to get a player that can play in their top 6 right now. If they trade Yandle, they'll want a player that can help them now also. Lazar and Neil aren't those players. Neil could be a guy that attracts contending teams but that would be at a low price.
History has shown that rental top 4 defensemen are high priced. Sekera, Coburn and etc have landed 1rst +, Yandle could land Lazar on his own as a rental.
Vesa Awesaka
#KeepTheSenate
- Jul 4, 2013
- 18,236
- 25
Really? I guess its must have been awhile since i watched a sens game. I think it helps once we get set up in the offensive. Better angles to use his shot after getting the puck off the boards
BonkTastic
ಠ_ಠ
This is the stumbling block, IMO.
We're not going to pay that much to a guy who is going to sit behind Karlsson on the depth chart.
Sensinitis
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2012
- 15,934
- 5,526
I really hope we trade Neil at the deadline.
If he's re-signed, I'll go nuts.
If he isn't re-signed and we get no value for him, that's bad asset management.
If he's re-signed, I'll go nuts.
If he isn't re-signed and we get no value for him, that's bad asset management.
That depends on what Neil wants, he's a well respected player and gave his all for this organization. I doubt the team would trade him if he has the desire to stay.
The return we would get would be minimal, and only to give a chance to Neil to win a cup. If he wants to stay I wouldn't care. I don't think he'll get another contract here, he's likely to retire after this season IMO.
Neil's value is so low, and he's been such a good player/person for this community that I really don't get how it would be bad asset management to keep him if that's what he wants. It really is a non-factor for this team going forward.
Neil will get us a 3rd. At most a 2nd round pick from a contending team. I won't lose sleep if we decide to keep him, he's earned it..
An rfa for a ufa that may not resign with us ..........Yeah enough with the Shattenkirk nonsense ,he is a nice player but he isnt a need .We need LHD ,not RHD
Sensinitis
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2012
- 15,934
- 5,526
If he's set on retiring this season, I respect that and keep him.
If he wants to play past this season, that's a different story.
If he wants to play past this season, that's a different story.
BonkTastic
ಠ_ಠ
BK201
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 10,815
- 308
- Status
Ad
Upcoming events
-
-
-
-
2024 NHL Draft Lottery Team that wins #1 pick - PICK ONLY ONE TEAMWagers: 10Staked: $12,250.00Event closes- Updated:
