BigG44
Registered User
- Jul 12, 2007
- 24,127
- 1,579
I just hope we don't overpay on the backend if we give to much term. However, Nil seems to be cautious giving out large sums of money over long periods of time so I can't see this being anything other than good news. Not to mention, Spezza seems like the ultimate professional and a class act so he may very well be looking to stay at a place he likes for a fair deal, as opposed to trying to scratch out every last penny and year he could get if he tested free agency.
My guess is 4 years 7m or 5 years by 6.5m
The new rules make it difficult to not overpay on the backend. If we knew the total number of year, I bet you we could all nail the deal within a few hundred thousand.
In his prime which he is now he's worth at least as much as Stastny. That means several years at $7 million or slightly more. That restricts the last years of the contract from being lower than $3.5 million.
I think it's safe to assume he'll get $7 .. and then just go down based on extra years. If you used Gaborik as somewhat of a template with a slightly higher initial salary ....
3 years at $7
4 years at $6.75
5 years at $6.3
7 years at $5.5
You can manipulate those numbers up and down a bit but not a ton. That's based on paying him at a premium for 4 years and then either using the 5th or 5th-7th as years to reduce the overall hit.