BobRouse
Registered User
- Mar 18, 2009
- 10,144
- 374
Anisimov and Dubinsky don't belong in the same sentence as Prust in that context. Prust is infinitely more replaceable than either of them.
Maybe we're both tip-toeing around the real problem, a loss of depth.
And if Hendricks would get closer to $2.5M than $900K, the Caps should let him walk.
I think Prust was every bit as valuable as those two guys. I guess Rangers fans would know better but for me I really liked Prust.
I thought he was their best player in the playoff series vs us in 10-11 as well.
I don't believe Hendricks to be depth. I believe him to be core.
What about a team who shows a lack of unity and chemistry as the Caps have pretty much for a long time? They rarely have each other's backs on the ice.
Mad or not, as a paying fan, I expect the team to always try and improve. If you're saying the roster is fine and doesn't need to be adjusted at all, we'll agree to disagree (cough double nickel cough).
I'm saying Hendricks is part of the solution to what has plagued the Caps.
Erskine getting a jersey nightly and bringing aboard Oleksy and Volpatti is taking a step in the right direction. Letting go of Hendricks is a step backwards.