Ambassador Of Fun
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2010
- 2,780
- 11
Dunno who this guy is or if he's credible or not but apparently Kesler has also asked for a trade. https://twitter.com/LouisJean_TVA/status/438851798338502658
Dunno who this guy is or if he's credible or not but apparently Kesler has also asked for a trade. https://twitter.com/LouisJean_TVA/status/438851798338502658
Dunno who this guy is or if he's credible or not but apparently Kesler has also asked for a trade. https://twitter.com/LouisJean_TVA/status/438851798338502658
Louis Jean @LouisJean_TVA
It should be noted, Kesler's trade request goes back to the start of the season. #Canucks #NHL
I agree with Worley that Kesler fits what Dallas needs ... almost perfectly honestly ... but I'd be extremely concerned about his long term sustainability.
Just for fun though ....
Seguin-Benn
Kesler-Nichushkin
OK ... out of my system. Don't trade for him. The cost should be ridiculous.
I agree it would be amazing, and it would cost too much.
What would everyone give up though? I'm not as high on him as some others around here I don't think. But hypothetically I'd give a 1st + b prospect + 3rd.
Bob McKenzie: Well it's by no means guaranteed but it is a possibility. The buzz on Kesler is increasing by the day. Now, we should get the disclaimers out of the way. The Vancouver Canucks are not aggressively shopping and trying to trade Ryan Kesler, but I do believe that they're aggressively listening. Keep in mind though that Kesler has got a no-move, no-trade clause, so he's not going anywhere he doesn't want to go. Keep in mind also that he's technically injured right now, he's got a finger injury that might be broken, we're only guessing. The Canucks say he's day-to-day so hopefully that won't come into play. But the question then becomes what would the Canucks have to get back in order to consider trading Kesler? It would obviously be a lot. What they're going to be looking for is to pick up a young centre between the ages of 20-25 who can grow into the role that Kesler is in right now. Somebody that gives you a fighting chance at a reload if not necessarily a rebuild.
Little doubt in my mind Dallas is of the conversation unless Cody Eakin is part of the package.
Scroll up, PHX will only trade money for money. Whitney for a draft pick is dead.
That would not be worth it. I'd rather give up Faksa, Dickinson, or Shore +++ for Kesler than Eakin. And if that isn't enough, then I pass.
What about for a pick and Klesla? Depth d men are always valuable in a stretch run
What's our version of B Schenn, Simmonds, and a 2nd?
Chiasson, Roussel and a 1st?
That's honestly not good IMO.
Schenn/Simmonds is better than Chiasson
Simmonds/Schenn is miles better than a first
2nd is maybe, maybe equal to Roussel, but in reality it's probably better. I like Rous, but you can get Top 9 players pretty easily. He lacks a special quality.
What's our version of B Schenn, Simmonds, and a 2nd?
Chiasson, Roussel and a 1st?
I think it would be pretty funny if Tampa just put MSL on waivers and made him play out his contract in Edmonton or Buffalo.