mercury
Registered User
I was referring to the fact that the original post wanted to compare/contrast "the cream" of both draft years, and I believe that those two would have to be included. I understand the desire to compare the actual top 6 drafted (although 2005's draft obviously has not occurred), but it would seem to make a lot more sense to compare the players who have turned out to be the best picks of 2003 to the projections of who will most likely be the top 6 this year, if you are trying to get an idea of the top end talent in the respective years.Reveille! said:Except it doesn't since neither were drafted in the top 6.