Empoleon8771
Registered User
Cole is a nice player and we certainly need help on both sides of the blueline. But Botts and Rutherford are cut from the same cloth, so for the same reasons that PIT may be trying to move him - i.e., contract demand, style of play, expected regression on next contract due to age, etc. - I could see Buffalo steering clear of Cole. I imagine Cole wants to cash in on this next contract, especially after two Cup runs. I would be surprised if, with the holes Buffalo has all over its roster, Botts throws Cole a four- or five-year deal at $4m+ AAV. I think there's a decent chance that Cole looks a lot like Josh Gorges at the end of his next contract.
I think this is very possible and it's a very reasonable take. I think there's a very real chance that Cole's value here and Cole's value in the real hockey world are very different, because there are a lot of dumb GMs out there who value the **** out of leadership and experience. Cole by himself is a more physical Ron Hainsey to keep it as simple as possible, that's about it. He's a physical #5 DFD that played at a legitimate top-4 level on a cup winning team. Granted, it was probably only because Schultz was having a phenomenal season and Cole and Schultz were stapled together, but Cole was legitimately great last season. However, he's just not that player. He's not a 25 point, +25 DFD capable of playing 20 minutes a night like he was last year (he had 26 points in 81 games and was a +26 with 19:49 TOI/game). However, I could definitely see a team thinking he is (or at least he can sustain something close to that), because there are dumb GMs out there. Combine that with some intangibles, 2 cup wins and GRIT!!!! and I could definitely see Cole having some ridiculous value and get a ridiculous paycheck.
I'd like to think Botterill isn't a dumb GM, but I don't think we have enough of a track record to say that. Could you imagine if Cole would have been a free agent last year? Dear god, I could see some teams offering him contracts in the $5 millions. Alzner is at $4.625 and he only had 13 points last year.
Given Sprong's unavailability, I think a Kane deal with Pittsburgh would have to be more futures oriented (e.g., 2018 1st, 2019 2nd). Because I believe Botts wants a good, near NHL-ready prospect back in any deal, I think the Pens' offer would be trumped by another club.
I think Rutherford would be completely down to offer picks because he treats picks like trade assets more than draft picks. I could also see the Penguins including Simon in a potential Kane deal to be honest. Simon isn't knock off your socks good, but he's NHL ready and he has put up 2+ solid seasons in the AHL. He's doing well with the Penguins right now. Simon would be an intriguing piece in this deal because I actually think Rutherford wouldn't shy away from including him.
I like Simon, but for a team that already has Sheary and Guentzel, the need for another undersized playmaker doesn't seem all that high.