Still too early to evaluate, though if Holland knew Cholo was gonna be a flop, he probably would have picked a D.I don't think Zadina drops much in a redraft but part of that is due to it being a bad draft year. Not a lot of players having impact at the next level, at least so far.
Call me crazy, but I really like Zadina and think he has shown a lot of growth this year. Let’s start with skating, while it certainly isn’t “elite” my layman conclusion sees noticeable improvement in acceleration and speed. While his top speed is not great, his first few strides are better than the past and getting him there quicker. I’m not going to comment much on his shot, it is his best attribute. If the PP didn’t telegraph a pass to his circle everytime and could threaten something else he would be a major contributor.
My favorite thing I have seen from Zadina this year is his doggedness on the puck. This term gets thrown around a bunch, but he is a serious puck hound which I didn’t notice before this year. It’s kind of funny, but it seems like he works harder on the back check than the fore check. That could be part coaching, maybe part taking up the slack on less talented line mates. Would love to see him turned loose in the offensive zone.
I am excited to see what Zadina can do with a real playmaking center. I’m not going to go thru the game logs, but I feel like most of his time with Larkin was after his COVID bout. And while I love Larkin, he’s not really a playmaking center neither.
Zadina has a drive/work ethic to be great, could tell that from his comments at the draft. I think he is going to be a big part of the future.
I'm sure Fabbri would disagree especially after the last 2 games.I am excited to see what Zadina can do with a real playmaking center. I’m not going to go thru the game logs, but I feel like most of his time with Larkin was after his COVID bout. And while I love Larkin, he’s not really a playmaking center neither.
Zadina has been disappointing, offensively, so far. But I'm not worried, don't think yet that he was a bad pick, and don't have big worries about him moving forward. I would love for him to have been the type to jump in the league and immediately be a top scorer on the team, but there's context with Zadina that matters....
- He hasn't had a good supporting cast so far. He doesn't have a lot of other talent to work with. In addition to being on a shit roster overall, his two most common linemates this season have been Namestnikov and Gagner. 4th most common... Brome. Mostly 2nd PP time. Not a lot of help there. Hopefully he gets more time with Larkin moving forward.
- He's just 21. Still very young. Still a lot of time for further offensive development, especially if the team continues to add talent around him.
- His game includes a pretty good foundation. He's got an underrated two-way game to build off of. Isn't super fast, but he's a good skater. He doesn't have big warts that are going to make it more difficult for him to focus on that offensive development moving forward.
We just need to get center for both of themHis development is happening in the right order.
People are hoping for high production, but Zadina is on his way to think defence-first, and offense will come later. When Raymond comes and he is already the same kind of prototype, thanks to maturing at Frölunda, these guys will set a good standard for our kid core.
Can't say same about Mantha.
Conor mcdavid over here..Zadina hasn't impressed me once since we drafted him if I'm being honest.
3 goals in 27 games for this guy.
So annoying the Wings reddit parroting how 'good' he looks defensively and acting like he's figured out how to score already at the NHL level. Zadina hasn't impressed me once since we drafted him if I'm being honest.
It's worth noting he's shooting less than 6% right now. That isnt going to continue. If he was converting at the rate he did last year, he would be just under a 25 goal paceI looked at my preseason predictions for Zadina.
Points-wise, he's pretty much there (pace wise, anyway).
But goals? 3 goals in 28 games? That's 6 goals for a 56-game pace. Or 9 goals for 82 games.
If that's what you envisioned for Zadina in D+3... well
f***, I didn't even want Zadina and I had him as a 25-goal threat by D+3.
It's worth noting he's shooting less than 6% right now. That isnt going to continue. If he was converting at the rate he did last year, he would be just under a 25 goal pace
Well, I expected more out of Darren Helm after his 3rd NHL season and here we are, lol.Yes, thank you. It's almost as if small sample sizes don't carry as much weight as large ones. A lesson not well learned by a certain poster around here.
I mean, shit, if Zadina plays 1000 games in his career, he's on pace for 107 career goals. If that's what you guys envisioned for Zadina's D+15 career, well, f***!
It's worth noting he's shooting less than 6% right now. That isnt going to continue. If he was converting at the rate he did last year, he would be just under a 25 goal pace
Yes, thank you. It's almost as if small sample sizes don't carry as much weight as large ones. A lesson not well learned by a certain poster around here.
I mean, shit, if Zadina plays 1000 games in his career, he's on pace for 107 career goals. If that's what you guys envisioned for Zadina's D+15 career, well, f***!
Small sample sizes don't matter?
GFTO.
It's the same size we have.
Stop being ridiculous.
We're talking specifically about what he's shown us this season.
Where did I say they don't matter? I didn't say that, you're missing the point. You try to present theese samples as if they matter more than they actually do. Does anyone think Zadina is a 9-goal per 82-game player? No? Then what's the point of framing it as a "9-goal pace?" 1 goal in 9 games is also a "9-goal pace," but who cares. Everyone can see 3 goals in 28 games is not good. It's a small sample though. There will be statistical regression.
If you were talking specifically about what he's shown us this season, you would literally stick to "3 goals in 28 games." Everyone here knows that's not great. Good lawd.
I don't know.
If Zadina is a 9-goal per 80 game season guy with regular 1st and 2nd unit PP time, maybe he is a 9-goal per 60 guy.
Because a coach can't just keep sending him over the boards for the powerplay if that's what he produces.
I had this thought the other day... Is Zadina absolutely going to be better at 25 years old than Fabbri is right now?
The guy doesn't generate anything on his own.
He can fit within a system and make the right plays that infrequently result in points.
But I don't know what Zadina is right now. He doesn't have the skating and/or elusiveness to self-create.
I certainly thought he was better than what he's shown this year. But I'm not watching him thinking, "Man Zadina is doing so many great things, but he's had no luck."
He's still right at the bottom in CF%, just ahead of Flip and Ras.
Eye test - Not impressive (offensively) I am impressed by his hustle around the ice and sometimes shows solid creative IQ. But he's not all that poised and skates himself into bad situations and falls asleep on the backcheck.
Regular stats - Not impressive
Advanced stats - Even worse.
At 21, it sure seems like Zadina ought to be starting to show something, It's not like the Wings aren't giving him every opportunity.
I sure would like to see it by the mid-point next year, or the bust clock will start ticking.
I'd have ZERO misgivings replacing Zadina on the PP and putting Svech in that role - and then bumping Zadina to more of a QB role.
Yeah, I'm not so sure last year was a better representation that this year. At all.
Zadina shoots a lot and doesn't score much because his shot isn't hard and isn't deceptive.
Regardless, a 9-goal pace for a guy who's consistently lined up as a shooter on the powerplay... there's no defending that.
All you can say is he's young and you hope he improves.