Prospect Info: Yotes Fans Only: Dvorsky or Leonard?

[rt]

***Yotes Fans Only***​

Let’s see the results when they’re public and not linked on the main board. I’m betting the total vote count is 50% lower.

***Yotes Fans Only***​

Click to read more...

 

[Kai Yo T]

Dammit! I wanted Leonard but accidentally chose Dvorsky when I was trying to swipe on my phone lol.

 

[hbk]

I just re-watched Dvorsky play Canada in bronze medal game yesterday. Dvorsky was a dominant force and played heavy minutes in a key position. Strong 200 foot C who can play in any situation with enough offence that he could be a 1C down the road. Ryan O’Reilly type player. Love his game.

 

[MayDayMayDay]

Give me the guy who plays playoff hockey every game.

 

[rt]

Dammit! I wanted Leonard but accidentally chose Dvorsky when I was trying to swipe on my phone lol.

I’ll vote Leonard to even it out.

 

[Matias Maccete]

Reinbacher, but of the 2 I'll go Leonard.

 

[Jormungandr]

My main problem with Leonard is he’s not big enough to play the style of game he wants to play long term. I’ve seen him listed at 5’11”, and 6’. Hopefully at the combine he comes in at or slightly above 6’ and not 5’11”. He doesn’t strike me as very big when I watch him though, so I’m a little skeptical.

 

[Vinny Boombatz]

I say we just get them both...problem solved

Take Dvorsky #6 and then trade up with Washington and select Leonard #8...easy peasy

 

[Kai Yo T]

I’ll vote Leonard to even it out.

Awesome, thanks! A little embarrassing to mess up your poll right out the gates lol. Glad you could do that.

 

[SR]

I say we just get them both...problem solved

Take Dvorsky #6 and then trade up with Washington and select Leonard #8...easy peasy

Same boat. Huge success in the first round while missing out on Bedard.

 

[rt]

These seems like it’s too close to call.

Follow-Up: Would anyone actually be disappointed if we chose one over the other? Meaning, do any of you have a very strong preference? For me, it’s basically a coin-toss.

 

[hbk]

These seems like it’s too close to call.

Follow-Up: Would anyone actually be disappointed if we chose one over the other? Meaning, do any of you have a very strong preference? For me, it’s basically a coin-toss.

I’m content to trust our scouts as well. Unless they take someone who’s far down or not even on my list at 6.

 

[Matias Maccete]

These seems like it’s too close to call.

Follow-Up: Would anyone actually be disappointed if we chose one over the other? Meaning, do any of you have a very strong preference? For me, it’s basically a coin-toss.

I'm pretty much at "trust our scouts until the player busts". Geekie pick looks iffy, but still way to early to call.

 

[Kai Yo T]

These seems like it’s too close to call.

Follow-Up: Would anyone actually be disappointed if we chose one over the other? Meaning, do any of you have a very strong preference? For me, it’s basically a coin-toss.

Coin-toss for me too

 

[RedBeard]

Close, but Dvorsky would be my pick. Using some of BA's logic, if there is a tie or players are part of the same tier on your list, you may pick based on need. If there is a position I am most comfortable stacking prospects it is center.

 

[moosemeister]

Close, but Dvorsky would be my pick. Using some of BA's logic, if there is a tie or players are part of the same tier on your list, you may pick based on need. If there is a position I am most comfortable stacking prospects it is center.

There is always a chance Geekie busts or Cooley doesn’t play center. I say keep drafting centers. Centers can always move to wing.

 

[XX]

Prefer risers to those that have fallen slightly or not upped their game. Leonard.

 

[Sciamachy]

Leonard. I've got Leonard and Benson as a very close 5/6 and Dvorsky at 9(ish) on my list.

 

[Vinny Boombatz]

These seems like it’s too close to call.

Follow-Up: Would anyone actually be disappointed if we chose one over the other? Meaning, do any of you have a very strong preference? For me, it’s basically a coin-toss.

I have Dvorsky #6/Leonard #7, so yeah, wouldn't care either way

 

[Grimes]

These seems like it’s too close to call.

Follow-Up: Would anyone actually be disappointed if we chose one over the other? Meaning, do any of you have a very strong preference? For me, it’s basically a coin-toss.

Will be thrilled with either.

Prefer risers to those that have fallen slightly or not upped their game. Leonard.

This has become something I factor into prospects now too so I give a slight edge to Leonard. I just wonder if there have rely been enough eyes on Dvorsky to know if he has or hasn't upped his game

 

[YotesFan47]

I chose Leonard, but either is fine. I think Leonard may have a better shot as a difference maker, though I think he also has a lower floor. I'm willing to make the trade for a higher impact player.

 

[rt]

Will be thrilled with either.



This has become something I factor into prospects now too so I give a slight edge to Leonard. I just wonder if there have rely been enough eyes on Dvorsky to know if he has or hasn't upped his game

Don’t forget to vote!

 

[Prestigeworldwide]

I love Leonard's motor, physical play. He has a I'll out work you/winner mentality. Great possession/transition numbers, great defender and can score. Leonard all the way for me.
Wouldn't mind Smith either though...

 

[Mosby]

I just re-watched Dvorsky play Canada in bronze medal game yesterday. Dvorsky was a dominant force and played heavy minutes in a key position. Strong 200 foot C who can play in any situation with enough offence that he could be a 1C down the road. Ryan O’Reilly type player. Love his game.

This is my sense as well. Lacks offensive pizzazz, but everything else is there. And that's not say he doesn't score. It's just not super flashy and fun.

 

[Grimes]

Don’t forget to vote!

Already did! Made sure some friends and my parents did too

This is my sense as well. Lacks offensive pizzazz, but everything else is there. And that's not say he doesn't score. It's just not super flashy and fun.

Reminds me a bit of Aho