Claimed off Waivers: [WSH] Axel Jonsson-Fjallby claimed off waivers by the Capitals from the Sabres

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,115
13,639
Philadelphia
Really? You dont think they have agreed to do this on beforehand. Sure no other team picked him. Yet how fast did Buffalo pick him (were they picking ahead of other teams?) . Buffalo is helping Washington (Will most likely get a "favor" in return in the near futire) . The sole looser being the player looking foolish in the other teams jearsy for a day and then gets sent down eventhough he shouldnt have been (Because of the rules right?!) had he stayed with the team he left and immediatly came back to
How did this help Washington in any way? It didn't.
 

uncleben

Global Moderator
Dec 4, 2008
14,264
8,678
Acton, Ontario
Really? You dont think they have agreed to do this on beforehand. Sure no other team picked him. Yet how fast did Buffalo pick him (were they picking ahead of other teams?) . Buffalo is helping Washington (Will most likely get a "favor" in return in the near futire) . The sole looser being the player looking foolish in the other teams jearsy for a day and then gets sent down eventhough he shouldnt have been (Because of the rules right?!) had he stayed with the team he left and immediatly came back to

This "plan" would hinge on 25 other teams ahead of Washington in the waiver priority order not selecting the player before Washington, when Buffalo waived him, AND the 6 teams behind Washington also not putting in a claim, so they could loan him to the AHL. Not the best plan, imo.


  • Effectively, Washington said, "we do not think this player is NHL calibre"
  • Then all other 31 teams had a chance to agree or disagree.
  • Buffalo said, "We do think he is NHL worthy. We will take him for our roster."
  • At the point Buffalo no longer felt he was NHL-calibre (this time around it was actually a visa issue they didn't want to deal with, not necessarily him not being good enough), they put him back on waivers, giving all other teams a chance to put him on their roster.
  • If any team felt he was worth it, they could claim him and put him on their roster
  • This includes Washington having the chance to claim him too
  • If a team ahead of Washington in priority makes a claim, he goes to their NHL team
  • If Washington makes a successful claim, he goes there - this is were the linear path diverges...
  • a) A team after Washington also puts in a claim, meaning they think he should be in the NHL, and therefore Washington has to keep him in the NHL, or offer him back on waivers, so that that team can attempt to claim him again OR
  • b) No other team puts in a claim. At this point, all 32 teams agree he is not an NHL player at the moment - Washington wants him down, Buffalo does not want him on the team, all other 30 teams have turned down the option to claim. The player has, in effect, "cleared waivers". There is no functional difference at that point to him having cleared waivers the first time, and he can be sent down. This is what happened in this situation

This is no conspiracy or circumvention; every team in the League had the same opportunity. It is precisely the purpose of and the way the waiver system is designed, to a tee, to give the player the best chance of having a spot in the NHL.
Neither Buffalo nor Washington benefitted from this. In fact, you could argue this was a detriment to Washington because they had to do the extra steps, instead of being able to loan him straight to the AHL and because they had to make season-opening decisions with one less player in their depth chart to depend on; Buffalo had the displeasure and inconvenience of thinking they had a roster player that could start for them opening night, only to realize he wasn't a viable roster option and had to change plans. If this was in-season, BUF also would have had the small negative impact of having to count his salary against the cap for those 7 days... miniscule, but still.
No team received a benefit; both teams suffered minor inconveniences at best.

TL;DR: All 32 teams agreed he should clear waivers and not be in the NHL - just with extra steps
 
Last edited:

Seachd

Registered User
Mar 16, 2002
24,949
8,957
Really? You dont think they have agreed to do this on beforehand. Sure no other team picked him. Yet how fast did Buffalo pick him (were they picking ahead of other teams?) . Buffalo is helping Washington (Will most likely get a "favor" in return in the near futire) . The sole looser being the player looking foolish in the other teams jearsy for a day and then gets sent down eventhough he shouldnt have been (Because of the rules right?!) had he stayed with the team he left and immediatly came back to
This makes no sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDBondra

Michel Beauchamp

Canadiens' fan since 1958
Mar 17, 2008
23,026
3,226
Laval, Qc
Really? You dont think they have agreed to do this on beforehand. Sure no other team picked him. Yet how fast did Buffalo pick him (were they picking ahead of other teams?) . Buffalo is helping Washington (Will most likely get a "favor" in return in the near futire) . The sole looser being the player looking foolish in the other teams jearsy for a day and then gets sent down eventhough he shouldnt have been (Because of the rules right?!) had he stayed with the team he left and immediatly came back to
You really don't understand the waivers rules, do you?
 

Snauen

Registered User
Dec 27, 2017
1,349
526
No I still dont understand (maybe because people here lack the skill to explain how things work, except for uncleben there maybe..)If the rule says hes got to be on waivers before sent down, then why did Buffalo pick him of waivers merely to put the player on waivers again? "A VISA issue"? You need a visa to Buffalo and not to Washington? Fishy indeed.. If this was done by the book the player should be playing in Buffalo right now. As I UNDERSTAND it.
 
Last edited:

Maurice of Orange

Wahatquenak
Feb 5, 2016
10,157
6,772
No I still dont understand (maybe because people here lack the skill to explain how things work, exept for uncleben there maybe..)If the rule says hes got to be on waivers before sent down, then why did Buffalo pick him of waivers merely to put the player on waivers again? "A VISA issue"? You need a visa to Buffalo and not to Washington? Fishy indeed.. If this was done by the book the player should be playing in Buffalo right now. As I UNDERSTAND it.
It’s a conspiracy man. :sarcasm:
 

SDBondra

Registered User
Jul 24, 2005
1,201
489
No I still dont understand (maybe because people here lack the skill to explain how things work, exept for uncleben there maybe..)If the rule says hes got to be on waivers before sent down, then why did Buffalo pick him of waivers merely to put the player on waivers again? "A VISA issue"? You need a visa to Buffalo and not to Washington? Fishy indeed.. If this was done by the book the player should be playing in Buffalo right now. As I UNDERSTAND it.

Umm maybe because they are desperate for NHL-caliber players and thought he was good enough to play on their tire fire of a roster? He’s blazing fast - perhaps they thought he was ready to be a Hagelin or Grabner? Then after kicking the tires on him, realized he wasn’t ready and released him back.
 

uncleben

Global Moderator
Dec 4, 2008
14,264
8,678
Acton, Ontario
No I still dont understand (maybe because people here lack the skill to explain how things work, exept for uncleben there maybe..)If the rule says hes got to be on waivers before sent down, then why did Buffalo pick him of waivers merely to put the player on waivers again? "A VISA issue"? You need a visa to Buffalo and not to Washington? Fishy indeed.. If this was done by the book the player should be playing in Buffalo right now. As I UNDERSTAND it.
His visa was simply to work in the US, from Sweden. Foreign players need to update and renew those
This would have delayed him playing for Buffalo on opening night, so they simply cut him loose from their roster, so they could put in someone that could play

Washington will still have to wait for that visa situation to be resolved as well, but they are seemingly more willing to wait it out
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexBrovechkin8

Drake1588

UNATCO
Sponsor
Jul 2, 2002
30,110
2,506
Northern Virginia
The difference is that Washington was never under any illusion that he'd compete for an NHL spot. He was always going to play in Hershey for them. Buffalo was willing to check him out at the NHL level. So the urgency wasn't there for the Caps to the same degree, and the timing of the start of the NHL season irrelevant when measured against the time it is taking to resolve his visa situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncleben

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,115
13,639
Philadelphia
No I still dont understand (maybe because people here lack the skill to explain how things work, exept for uncleben there maybe..)If the rule says hes got to be on waivers before sent down, then why did Buffalo pick him of waivers merely to put the player on waivers again? "A VISA issue"? You need a visa to Buffalo and not to Washington? Fishy indeed.. If this was done by the book the player should be playing in Buffalo right now. As I UNDERSTAND it.

Buffalo selected him on waivers because they wanted to look at him for their NHL squad. It's as simple as that. No conspiracy. No additional explanation needed.

They put him back on waivers when it was determined he wasn't going to be on their NHL squad.
 

GRob83

Registered User
Feb 3, 2010
525
349
I'm torn on whether I want his Sabres jersey or a Vanecek Kraken jersey. Damn. 2 absolute legends of their franchises.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chupacabra08

MarkusKetterer

Shoulda got one game in
He was there for a week. The visa he had was as an employee of the Capitals. Once he was picked up by the Sabres, he had to get a new visa, because he’s now employed with a different employer. Consequently he didn’t play in a single preseason game for the Sabres, as that counts as “employment”, even though the players aren’t getting money yet (not counting any signing bonuses received).

The visa applies to whether he’s in the AHL or NHL, because the farm team is basically a subsidiary of the main company (aka the NHL team), and is paying the player.

This just shows you that a sports visa should be a blanket visa, good for XX months of the year, and is transferable when a player switches teams, without needing to get a new one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Michel Beauchamp

Canadiens' fan since 1958
Mar 17, 2008
23,026
3,226
Laval, Qc
No I still dont understand (maybe because people here lack the skill to explain how things work, except for uncleben there maybe..)If the rule says hes got to be on waivers before sent down, then why did Buffalo pick him of waivers merely to put the player on waivers again? "A VISA issue"? You need a visa to Buffalo and not to Washington? Fishy indeed.. If this was done by the book the player should be playing in Buffalo right now. As I UNDERSTAND it.
Which just goes to show that you don't UNDERTAND it...
 

Snauen

Registered User
Dec 27, 2017
1,349
526
He was there for a week. The visa he had was as an employee of the Capitals. Once he was picked up by the Sabres, he had to get a new visa, because he’s now employed with a different employer. Consequently he didn’t play in a single preseason game for the Sabres, as that counts as “employment”, even though the players aren’t getting money yet (not counting any signing bonuses received).

The visa applies to whether he’s in the AHL or NHL, because the farm team is basically a subsidiary of the main company (aka the NHL team), and is paying the player.

This just shows you that a sports visa should be a blanket visa, good for XX months of the year, and is transferable when a player switches teams, without needing to get a new one.
In short; The papers were not in a complete order . Therefore he got back to Was (and sent down)-, otherwise he would be playing NHL-hockey in Buffalo for atleast a couple of games. UNDERSTOOD , thanks for explaining the visa-rules. Thanks for knowing and informing about Jonsson-Fjällbys exakt visa situation! No circumventing the waiver rules here, sorry for thinking along those lines and bringing that up. Love ya" all!
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncleben

Arthuros

Registered Snoozer
Feb 24, 2014
13,181
8,617
Littleroot Town
You think that is a coincidence?

Caps head office: "So Axel, we've got a great plan.

We're gonna waive you...but hear us out. Buffalo's gonna claim you but they're not gonna be able to actually get you into a game because of visa issues. Then we'll claim you right back, and we're gonna make you debut against the Sabres.

It'll be f***ing hilarious."
 

txpd

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
69,649
14,131
New Bern, NC
Caps head office: "So Axel, we've got a great plan.

We're gonna waive you...but hear us out. Buffalo's gonna claim you but they're not gonna be able to actually get you into a game because of visa issues. Then we'll claim you right back, and we're gonna make you debut against the Sabres.

It'll be f***ing hilarious."

No. You missed the point. That they are giving him his NHL debut vs Buffalo. Thats not a coincidence. That's motivation
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Gold Coast Suns @ Brisbane Lions
    Gold Coast Suns @ Brisbane Lions
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $36,790.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Cagliari vs Lecce
    Cagliari vs Lecce
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Osasuna vs Real Betis
    Osasuna vs Real Betis
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $85.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Empoli vs Frosinone
    Empoli vs Frosinone
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $10.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Hellas Verona vs Fiorentina
    Hellas Verona vs Fiorentina
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $10.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad