Claimed off Waivers: [WSH] Axel Jonsson-Fjallby claimed off waivers by the Capitals from the Sabres

Extra Texture

A new career
Mar 21, 2008
8,851
3,683
in a new town
giphy.gif
 

cwede

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 1, 2010
9,806
7,685
For reference, the fact that Washington got him back means that no one else put a claim in on him, meaning they're free to send him to the AHL without waivers to my knowledge.

well, sorta -I believe there's a bit more to it

(a) "the fact that Washington got him back means that no one else AHEAD IN WAIVER PRIORITY put a claim in on him"

(b) that "they're free to send him to the AHL without waivers" is what indicates that no other team at all claimed him. when posted to waivers this time around. Thus his prior waiving team can demote without waiving again after (re)claim
 

uncleben

Global Moderator
Dec 4, 2008
14,264
8,678
Acton, Ontario
I thought Washington had dibs because he was claimed from them.
No it's normal waiver priority. Only benefit Washington gets is if they are the only team to put in a claim, they can send him straight to the minors (as, at that point every team in the League would have passed on him as an NHL player) - and this is what happened today. Washington was the only team to put in a claim, so they are free to immediately assign him to the minors
 

uncleben

Global Moderator
Dec 4, 2008
14,264
8,678
Acton, Ontario
How does that work? I wasn't aware there was any financial transaction involved in waivers.
It essentially is of little value to the fan, but it's a little known fact that I like to report it, anyway

It's a compensation. No contract is transactionable without a fee (save for the neutered modern-day "future considerations" which practically does mean nothing, now); there must be a return in order to transfer a player.
This waiver fee is based on the players experience in the league, and position - they can be as high as $90,000 for a goaltender with 2 years of experience under a SPC, or $3,375 for a player with 10+ years under a SPC (or $125 for a player on Unconditional Waivers, for buyouts and terminations).

The rough idea is that a player with less experience has not had a chance to fully develop, so the team is compensated for developing them without reaping any of the reward, whereas a journeyman being waived, you know exactly what you are getting, and they are probably being waived for a specific reason. Consider the compensation a gradient from 'not NHL ready' to 'no longer NHL capable', and if one team says, "well if you're not going to use him, we're going to" then they pay to take over the player's contract.
 

txpd

Registered User
Jan 25, 2003
69,649
14,131
New Bern, NC
No it's normal waiver priority. Only benefit Washington gets is if they are the only team to put in a claim, they can send him straight to the minors (as, at that point every team in the League would have passed on him as an NHL player) - and this is what happened today. Washington was the only team to put in a claim, so they are free to immediately assign him to the minors

The main benefit Washington gets is that they have a plan for this player and put effort and money into him and they get to continue.
 

searle

Registered User
Jan 24, 2014
1,253
772
England
It essentially is of little value to the fan, but it's a little known fact that I like to report it, anyway

It's a compensation. No contract is transactionable without a fee (save for the neutered modern-day "future considerations" which practically does mean nothing, now); there must be a return in order to transfer a player.
This waiver fee is based on the players experience in the league, and position - they can be as high as $90,000 for a goaltender with 2 years of experience under a SPC, or $3,375 for a player with 10+ years under a SPC (or $125 for a player on Unconditional Waivers, for buyouts and terminations).

The rough idea is that a player with less experience has not had a chance to fully develop, so the team is compensated for developing them without reaping any of the reward, whereas a journeyman being waived, you know exactly what you are getting, and they are probably being waived for a specific reason. Consider the compensation a gradient from 'not NHL ready' to 'no longer NHL capable', and if one team says, "well if you're not going to use him, we're going to" then they pay to take over the player's contract.
Interesting stuff, thanks for explaining!
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncleben

Snauen

Registered User
Dec 27, 2017
1,349
526
Silly stuff. Wow, team a and b have figured out how to manipulate a rule together *applause* (ironic)
 

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,115
13,639
Philadelphia
Silly stuff. Wow, team a and b have figured out how to manipulate a rule together *applause* (ironic)
No rules were manipulated. Washington waived him for purposes of assigning him to Hershey. As part of that normal waiver process, Buffalo claimed him. Buffalo then realized he wasn't going to make their team either, and they waved him for purposes of assigning him to the AHL. Washington claimed him. Since no other team put in a waiver claim, Washington finished assigning him to AHL Hershey. If another team wanted to claim him, they absolutely could have, which would have interrupted Washington's attempt to assign him to the AHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nikolajs Sillers

Snauen

Registered User
Dec 27, 2017
1,349
526
No rules were manipulated. Washington waived him for purposes of assigning him to Hershey. As part of that normal waiver process, Buffalo claimed him. Buffalo then realized he wasn't going to make their team either, and they waved him for purposes of assigning him to the AHL. Washington claimed him. Since no other team put in a waiver claim, Washington finished assigning him to AHL Hershey. If another team wanted to claim him, they absolutely could have, which would have interrupted Washington's attempt to assign him to the AHL.
Really? You dont think they have agreed to do this on beforehand. Sure no other team picked him. Yet how fast did Buffalo pick him (were they picking ahead of other teams?) . Buffalo is helping Washington (Will most likely get a "favor" in return in the near futire) . The sole looser being the player looking foolish in the other teams jearsy for a day and then gets sent down eventhough he shouldnt have been (Because of the rules right?!) had he stayed with the team he left and immediatly came back to
 

HTFN

Registered User
Feb 8, 2009
12,293
10,981
Really? You dont think they have agreed to do this on beforehand. Sure no other team picked him. Yet how fast did Buffalo pick him (were they picking ahead of other teams?) . Buffalo is helping Washington (Will most likely get a "favor" in return in the near futire) . The sole looser being the player looking foolish in the other teams jearsy for a day and then gets sent down eventhough he shouldnt have been (Because of the rules right?!) had he stayed with the team he left and immediatly came back to
Why would they need to?

All Washington would need in order to do what they wanted in the first place is for Buffalo to do... nothing. 29 teams saw it happen and didn't get in the way. What "favor" did Buffalo do by getting in the way of a waiver transaction that nobody else wanted to stop?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hivemind

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad