Would you trade Sam Bennett for the 3rd overall selection?

[Skobel24]

Yes, as long as you can trade the 6th for a young 1c center like and rnh, zinanejad, Ryan strome etc.

Puljujarvi is unreal good, and I'd still want a + for proven vs unproven, but puljus talent is right up there with #13 imo

I'd rather keep Bennett and move the 6th for a lesser RW.

 

[Ace Rimmer]

If the Leafs take Laine and the Jets take Puljujarvi, I would.

I voted "Hell No" but would be forced to reconsider in this circumstance.

Even then, I might also wait and see if Matthews falls to #6.

 

[AgeOfBennett]

I voted "Hell No" but would be forced to reconsider in this circumstance.

Even then, I might also wait and see if Matthews falls to #6.

No way the nucks would pass him up

 

[BurnEmUp]

lol Matthews is going 1st overall.

..and if for some inexplicable reason he made it past TOR and WPG, no way does CLB pass on him at 3rd overall, or trade the pick.

 

[Johnny Hoxville]

That's true, Columbus would not pass on Mathews. The GM there would probably ask Bobrovsky to pinch him.

 

[Ace Rimmer]

No way the nucks would pass him up

No way any team passes him up.

 

[Otzelor]

Right now about 80% are against it. It will be interesting to see, how it´s gonna look like in 3 years from now on

 

[Pirate King Luffy]

Right now about 80% are against it. It will be interesting to see, how it´s gonna look like in 3 years from now on

Perhaps, but that's how the game works. Besides, this in the opinion of the fans. Treliving is the one who makes the moves regardless of what we want to happen or not.

Whatever move he makes, I trust him more than HF posters.

 

[SaintMorose]

Right now about 80% are against it. It will be interesting to see, how it´s gonna look like in 3 years from now on

I mean what are you expecting to see 3 year's from now?
If Jesse Puljujarvi does become slightly better than Bennett in 3-4 years we'd still be the organization that doesn't give up on young players who do everything we ask of them, and we'd still have that sandpaper at centre which we need for next season, and we wouldn't have that with Puljujarvi.
Are you going to be able to look back and credit the organization for that?

 

[Rangediddy]

I voted Yes, but for 3rd +.

What that plus is would have to be pretty great. If it wasn't great, then I wouldn't trade.

Puliujarvi + Korpisalo for Bennett? Maybe.
Puliujarvi + Werenski for Bennett? Hmmm...

Obviously outlandish value discrepnacies, but it'd have to be.