If we're going to use Karlsson's 17 game sample, then we better use Crosby's 41 game sample where he scored
32 goals and 66 points. There's no point in comparing Karlsson's absolute best when (a) he's not close to that level right now (b) you're not doing the same to the guy you're comparing him to.
As for Malkin, he is ALSO the better player. Hell, Stamkos is a better player than Karlsson too. Right now, his defensive game just isn't there to be in the conversation amongst those players. He's not even the best defenseman in the league
currently. Can he be? Absolutely. I have seen 90% of his games in the NHL, and I think he has the ability to do something special. He's a unique player who I would love to have as a Senator for the rest of his career.
But...my god, this forum is a little crazy.... and this is someone who has consistently defended Karlsson on the main board (like seriously, half of my posts are dedicated to that... although not as much as MoO or Sureves, haha).
EDIT: In terms of entertainment value, he's up there though... top 3 easily in my opinion.
P.S. If you don't think you're being biased, see the results here:
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=96717
Ignore the comments there though because some people clearly haven't seen a lot of EK, but still, I don't the answer is wrong... just the justification. eg. "Karlsson plays no defense" or that they are both equal defensively.
I'm not going to be popular here for speaking the truth, but it is what it is.