Sea Eagles
Registered User
- Feb 7, 2012
- 5,741
- 6,351
No. And Marchand is better than Landy
Is that so? I'd challenge that to be honest man.
Marchand: 0.65 points per game since being in the NHL
Landeskog: 0.67 points per game since bing in the NHL
(Landy wins)
Marchand Cap hit 17: 6.125M per
Landeskog Cap hit 17: 5.571M per
(Landy wins)
Career FO percentage Marchand: 37.2%
Career FO percentage Landeskog: 43.4%
(Landy wins)
Powerplay Points per game career Marchand: 0.070 per game
Powerplay Points per game career Landeskog: 0.148 per game
(Landy wins)
Powerplay Goals per game career Marchand: 0.046 per game
Powerplay Goals per game career Landeskog: 0.064 per game
(Landy wins)
Penalties conceded per game Marchand: 0.955
Penalties conceded per game Landeskog: 0.836
(Landy wins)
Shots per game average stat Marchand: 2.299
Shots per game average stat Landeskog: 2.706
(Landy wins)
Hits per game average stat Marchand: Marchand is embarrassed
Hits per game average stat Landeskog: Yes, well.
(Landy wins)
Captain & of their team (additional responsability) March: No
Captain & of their team (additional responsability) Landy: Yes
Mate, I'm scratching at ways to show (statistically) that Marchand is better in any way, because I don't want to look completely bias, so here are some counter points (I guess):
Average time on Ice Marchand: 19.07 per game
Average time on Ice Landeskog: 18.47 per game
(Marchand wins) - but given above stats, who is more effective with their time? Hmmmm
Career Shot percentage Marchand: 14.7%
Career Shot percentage Landeskog: 10.3%
(Marchand wins)
Game Winning goal Average per game Marchand: 0.060 per game
Game Winning goal Average per game Landeskog: 0.041 per game
Don't get me wrong, Marchand is a great player, and I'm not trying to belittle the player he is. But consider this:
Marchand has been playing with a playoff challenging & quality roster, and has achieved great results, don't get me wrong.
Landeskog has played with a perpetually building or rebuilding roster struggling down the bottom of the standings, with often quite a poor roster around him, yet statistically is better in almost every facet.
Claiming, "Marchand is better than Landy", is pretty out there. Given Marchand is then 1/2 a decade older than Landy already, I'd actually have him in our team over Marchand any day of the week.
And that is who your telling us you want for Mr 44 games, offensively terrible Carlo, who is showing absolutely great promise for a D-man at that young age.Heck, and people on this board know I'm Landy's hardest critic at times, and cop hell for it.