george14
Registered User
This is not a bash thread and I do not need a lecture about how "you don't need a ton of stars". I am aware, this is just for purposes of opinion on who do you think had the worst roster, or may the most surprising roster to win a Cup.
I was looking through some of the past teams to win it all. The 2006 Hurricanes were the #2 seed in the East, but I really am surprised looking back on their roster. Staal had a big year with 100 points, while Williams and Brind'Amour tallied 30 goals. But looking at that roster, it is shocking to me they won the Cup. Not to mention their goaltending was terrible in the regular season, even though Ward stood on his head in the playoffs.
- The Kings being an #8 seed in 2012 may get some votes, but they had great goaltending and some really good defense.
- 2004 Tampa Bay was not very deep either, after Marty, Lecavalier, and Richards they were not star studded.
I was looking through some of the past teams to win it all. The 2006 Hurricanes were the #2 seed in the East, but I really am surprised looking back on their roster. Staal had a big year with 100 points, while Williams and Brind'Amour tallied 30 goals. But looking at that roster, it is shocking to me they won the Cup. Not to mention their goaltending was terrible in the regular season, even though Ward stood on his head in the playoffs.
- The Kings being an #8 seed in 2012 may get some votes, but they had great goaltending and some really good defense.
- 2004 Tampa Bay was not very deep either, after Marty, Lecavalier, and Richards they were not star studded.