Buffaloed
webmaster
Looks like I snuck this one past.Congratulations, you have been nominated for the HFBoards Masterson Trophy!
Looks like I snuck this one past.Congratulations, you have been nominated for the HFBoards Masterson Trophy!
I "liked" it because I caught the faux pas.Looks like I snuck this one past.
I learn something new all the time on this site...Languages are democratic, if the majority of people use a word that gives it a new meaning it becomes acceptable in time.
My pet peeve has been 'reactionary' to describe someone that acts in a knee jerk fashion. The word means the exact opposite, that you cling to old ways.
I knew that because I was educated by reactionaries.Languages are democratic, if the majority of people use a word that gives it a new meaning it becomes acceptable in time.
My pet peeve has been 'reactionary' to describe someone that acts in a knee jerk fashion. The word means the exact opposite, that you cling to old ways.
Well, with its, consider also his, hers, ours, yours and theirs. It's far more analogous with those than with the apostrophe s possessives, despite the fact that all but his serve solely as pronouns (and while its technically can serve as one too, it rarely does so). Its is kind of an oddball, though, as it actually was originally it's, with the 's being the possessive rather than a contraction. It was to conform more closely with the other pronoun/possessive forms that it became its. Interestingly a brief bit of research makes it look like it's (as a possessive) got fully replaced by its shortly after contractions started to become used in English. Merriam-Webster links its replacing possessive it's with contraction it's replacing 'tis.On a completely different note- anyone else hate its vs. it's?
The dog's bone. Its bone. Because it's his bone. I still google this crap every 6 months or so- just weird how it breaks the rules of possessive language.
The whole 's possessive thing in general traces itself back to Old English (or Anglo-Saxon as its also called). Old English, unlike Middle or Modern English, had an elaborate case system, where words could take different forms to indicate what role they played in a sentence, whereas in Modern English word order and prepositional phrases are used instead. However, the possessive in Modern English is a descendant of the genitive case (which is used to indicate possession) from Old English.
That's so cool. My daughter is super into bugs right now.@dotcommunism, you need to “meet” @Lempo, the etymologist on the Carolina board.
They are all the buzz.That's so cool. My daughter is super into bugs right now.
forgot this one, it's very grammatically wrong but it's now out of control due to the Internet, using 'apostrophe s' to pluralize nouns.
e.g. The Smith's are our next door neighbors.
e.g. Krueger will hire assistant coach's soon.
there are even people using 'apostrophe s' on verbs. e.g. My grandmother garden's in her backyard.
For shame, I only knew 1.5 of those.imminent
eminent
immanent
Sabres announcement of Jeff Skinner contract imminent.
Jason Botterill is not an eminent GM.
Ralph Krueger sees positive energy immanent in everything.
Nimrod is a word you don't see very often. But someone just called one of the admins a nimrod so it deserves a deep dive.
Nimrod: A Common Word with an Unlikely Backstory
This one grinds my gears because this is literally some of the earliest **** you learn
Doesn't everyone call it Aldi's?
Can someone answer this question. It is about sabres grammar
Since the team is the Buffalo Sabres and not the Buffalo Sabre what would be correct?
Eichel is a sabre.
Eichel is a sabres.
Obviously the first one makes sense but I think Sabres is a proper name and not the plural of the word with regards to the name. Stupid grammar.