Flyerfan4life
Registered User
No no no no no no no no no no no no no
dont make me set you on ignore..
No no no no no no no no no no no no no
He trusts youth. If you are good enough you are old enough.
No no no no no no no no no no no no no
exactly. people think the Flyers are boring and dull, his teams usually are.
and on top of that he is a clown in a suit behind the bench.
would want Sutter to coach this team and Mark Morris as an assistant, the guy is great with younger players.
stay far, far away from Torts, Julien and Therrien.
Sutter synonymous with boring
Knoblauch I think would be the best solution as a head coach. Knows the personnel, knows a general system and has a high offensive game to his system. Plus, he has a history of winning.
If Torts can change, why not Sutter?
Also don't know why anyone would want Knoblauch.
There's two options:
a) he has no control over anything right now, which would mean you guys are just asking for him while knowing nothing about him (if you're only going based on what's written about him, remember that there were good things said about Hakstol before he got here too)
b) he has control, which would mean that he's responsible for all the stupid **** we're seeing when it comes to the 2nd PP personnel (Lehtera, Manning, no TK or Patrick at times, etc)
There's no way you could possibly know this for a fact. That's just a hopeful guess.Knoblauch implements the system, but it's up to Hak to supply the personnel for the system. I say Knoblauch because he knows what we have here and how we can be better as well. He understands the people here and with that knowledge, it can help transition easier to a new system.
There's no way you could possibly know this for a fact. That's just a hopeful guess.
I hope you're right, but there's nothing to back it up, true or false....
If Torts can change, why not Sutter?
Based on the complaints I keep seeing from CBJ fans, it doesn't seem like Torts changed that much. Last year was just incredibly fortunate and they're *****ing about the same things we ***** about.